Targeted killings

Contemporary challenges, risks and opportunities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of drones and other forms of targeted killings are being increasingly criticized at the international and domestic level. Before the backdrop of the most recent news that the United Nations has launched an inquiry into the overall legality of such a method of warfare and counterterrorism and its associated loss of civilian life, this article aims to give an overview on targeted killings as a means of warfare. The article asks what constitutes targeted killing and what distinguishes it from assassinations. It reflects on the safeguards, which are necessary to ensure the legality of the targeting process. This article further introduces the reader to an updated account of the use of Unmanned Combat Aircraft Systems, or 'drones', in targeted killings, employed as a means of warfare by the USA in its 'War on Terror'. The US drone campaign in Pakistan also raises questions in respect to State Sovereignty and potential violations of this central tenet of International Law. The article will also touch upon another field of global security, so called 'Hybrid Threats', where the use of targeted killing may have an operational military benefit as part of a holistic counterstrategy. It concludes with a sobering warning that while targeted killing operations may be an effective means of achieving short-term tactical goals within the scope of a wider operational objective, the unregulated and increased use of targeting killings by the USA in the 'War on Terror' would be both immoral as well as illegal in the long run.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-288
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Conflict and Security Law
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Military operations
warfare
legality
terrorism
aircraft
sovereignty
Pakistan
UNO
news
campaign
Aircraft
Military
threat
Drones

Cite this

@article{c83eb9c56f114e97b87cbc12059ec6fb,
title = "Targeted killings: Contemporary challenges, risks and opportunities",
abstract = "The use of drones and other forms of targeted killings are being increasingly criticized at the international and domestic level. Before the backdrop of the most recent news that the United Nations has launched an inquiry into the overall legality of such a method of warfare and counterterrorism and its associated loss of civilian life, this article aims to give an overview on targeted killings as a means of warfare. The article asks what constitutes targeted killing and what distinguishes it from assassinations. It reflects on the safeguards, which are necessary to ensure the legality of the targeting process. This article further introduces the reader to an updated account of the use of Unmanned Combat Aircraft Systems, or 'drones', in targeted killings, employed as a means of warfare by the USA in its 'War on Terror'. The US drone campaign in Pakistan also raises questions in respect to State Sovereignty and potential violations of this central tenet of International Law. The article will also touch upon another field of global security, so called 'Hybrid Threats', where the use of targeted killing may have an operational military benefit as part of a holistic counterstrategy. It concludes with a sobering warning that while targeted killing operations may be an effective means of achieving short-term tactical goals within the scope of a wider operational objective, the unregulated and increased use of targeting killings by the USA in the 'War on Terror' would be both immoral as well as illegal in the long run.",
author = "Bachmann, {Sascha Dominik}",
note = "{\circledC} Oxford University Press 2013",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1093/jcsl/krt007",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "259--288",
journal = "Journal of Conflict and Security Law",
issn = "1364-0224",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Targeted killings : Contemporary challenges, risks and opportunities. / Bachmann, Sascha Dominik.

In: Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2013, p. 259-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Targeted killings

T2 - Contemporary challenges, risks and opportunities

AU - Bachmann, Sascha Dominik

N1 - © Oxford University Press 2013

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The use of drones and other forms of targeted killings are being increasingly criticized at the international and domestic level. Before the backdrop of the most recent news that the United Nations has launched an inquiry into the overall legality of such a method of warfare and counterterrorism and its associated loss of civilian life, this article aims to give an overview on targeted killings as a means of warfare. The article asks what constitutes targeted killing and what distinguishes it from assassinations. It reflects on the safeguards, which are necessary to ensure the legality of the targeting process. This article further introduces the reader to an updated account of the use of Unmanned Combat Aircraft Systems, or 'drones', in targeted killings, employed as a means of warfare by the USA in its 'War on Terror'. The US drone campaign in Pakistan also raises questions in respect to State Sovereignty and potential violations of this central tenet of International Law. The article will also touch upon another field of global security, so called 'Hybrid Threats', where the use of targeted killing may have an operational military benefit as part of a holistic counterstrategy. It concludes with a sobering warning that while targeted killing operations may be an effective means of achieving short-term tactical goals within the scope of a wider operational objective, the unregulated and increased use of targeting killings by the USA in the 'War on Terror' would be both immoral as well as illegal in the long run.

AB - The use of drones and other forms of targeted killings are being increasingly criticized at the international and domestic level. Before the backdrop of the most recent news that the United Nations has launched an inquiry into the overall legality of such a method of warfare and counterterrorism and its associated loss of civilian life, this article aims to give an overview on targeted killings as a means of warfare. The article asks what constitutes targeted killing and what distinguishes it from assassinations. It reflects on the safeguards, which are necessary to ensure the legality of the targeting process. This article further introduces the reader to an updated account of the use of Unmanned Combat Aircraft Systems, or 'drones', in targeted killings, employed as a means of warfare by the USA in its 'War on Terror'. The US drone campaign in Pakistan also raises questions in respect to State Sovereignty and potential violations of this central tenet of International Law. The article will also touch upon another field of global security, so called 'Hybrid Threats', where the use of targeted killing may have an operational military benefit as part of a holistic counterstrategy. It concludes with a sobering warning that while targeted killing operations may be an effective means of achieving short-term tactical goals within the scope of a wider operational objective, the unregulated and increased use of targeting killings by the USA in the 'War on Terror' would be both immoral as well as illegal in the long run.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881344110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jcsl/krt007

DO - 10.1093/jcsl/krt007

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 259

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Conflict and Security Law

JF - Journal of Conflict and Security Law

SN - 1364-0224

IS - 2

ER -