Temporal associations between individual changes in hormones, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men

B.T. Crewther, J Carruthers, Liam P Kilduff, C E Sanctuary, C J Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To advance our understanding of the hormonal contribution to athletic performance, we examined the temporal associations between individual changes in testosterone (T) and/or cortisol (C) concentrations, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men. Two male cohorts classified as elites (n = 12) and non-elites (n = 12) completed five testing sessions over a six-week period. The athletes were tested for salivary T, C, T/C ratio, self-perceived training motivation, countermovement jump (CMJ) height and isometric mid-thigh pull peak force (IMTP PF), after which an actual training workout was performed. The elite men reported higher motivation to train and they produced greater CMJ height overall, whereas the non-elites had higher pooled T levels (p < 0.05). No significant group differences in C concentrations, T/C ratio or IMTP PF were found. The individual changes in T levels were positively associated with training motivation in the elite men only (p = 0.033), but the hormonal and motivation measures did not predict CMJ height or IMTP PF in either group. The monitoring of elite and non-elite men across a short training block revealed differences in T levels, motivation and lower-body power, which may reflect training and competitive factors in each group. Despite having lower T levels, the elite athletes showed better linkage between pre-training T fluctuations and subsequent motivation to train. The nature of the performance tests (i.e. single repetition trials) could partly explain the lack of an association with the hormonal and motivational measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-21
Number of pages7
JournalBiology of Sport
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thigh
Hormones
Athletes
Athletic Performance
Hydrocortisone
Testosterone

Cite this

Crewther, B.T. ; Carruthers, J ; Kilduff, Liam P ; Sanctuary, C E ; Cook, C J. / Temporal associations between individual changes in hormones, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men. In: Biology of Sport. 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 215-21.
@article{79a7c4a638444d2ea615322f30d13218,
title = "Temporal associations between individual changes in hormones, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men",
abstract = "To advance our understanding of the hormonal contribution to athletic performance, we examined the temporal associations between individual changes in testosterone (T) and/or cortisol (C) concentrations, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men. Two male cohorts classified as elites (n = 12) and non-elites (n = 12) completed five testing sessions over a six-week period. The athletes were tested for salivary T, C, T/C ratio, self-perceived training motivation, countermovement jump (CMJ) height and isometric mid-thigh pull peak force (IMTP PF), after which an actual training workout was performed. The elite men reported higher motivation to train and they produced greater CMJ height overall, whereas the non-elites had higher pooled T levels (p < 0.05). No significant group differences in C concentrations, T/C ratio or IMTP PF were found. The individual changes in T levels were positively associated with training motivation in the elite men only (p = 0.033), but the hormonal and motivation measures did not predict CMJ height or IMTP PF in either group. The monitoring of elite and non-elite men across a short training block revealed differences in T levels, motivation and lower-body power, which may reflect training and competitive factors in each group. Despite having lower T levels, the elite athletes showed better linkage between pre-training T fluctuations and subsequent motivation to train. The nature of the performance tests (i.e. single repetition trials) could partly explain the lack of an association with the hormonal and motivational measures.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "B.T. Crewther and J Carruthers and Kilduff, {Liam P} and Sanctuary, {C E} and Cook, {C J}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.5604/20831862.1201810",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "215--21",
journal = "Biology of Sport",
issn = "0860-021X",
publisher = "Institute of Sport",
number = "3",

}

Temporal associations between individual changes in hormones, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men. / Crewther, B.T.; Carruthers, J; Kilduff, Liam P; Sanctuary, C E; Cook, C J.

In: Biology of Sport, Vol. 33, No. 3, 09.2016, p. 215-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal associations between individual changes in hormones, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men

AU - Crewther, B.T.

AU - Carruthers, J

AU - Kilduff, Liam P

AU - Sanctuary, C E

AU - Cook, C J

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - To advance our understanding of the hormonal contribution to athletic performance, we examined the temporal associations between individual changes in testosterone (T) and/or cortisol (C) concentrations, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men. Two male cohorts classified as elites (n = 12) and non-elites (n = 12) completed five testing sessions over a six-week period. The athletes were tested for salivary T, C, T/C ratio, self-perceived training motivation, countermovement jump (CMJ) height and isometric mid-thigh pull peak force (IMTP PF), after which an actual training workout was performed. The elite men reported higher motivation to train and they produced greater CMJ height overall, whereas the non-elites had higher pooled T levels (p < 0.05). No significant group differences in C concentrations, T/C ratio or IMTP PF were found. The individual changes in T levels were positively associated with training motivation in the elite men only (p = 0.033), but the hormonal and motivation measures did not predict CMJ height or IMTP PF in either group. The monitoring of elite and non-elite men across a short training block revealed differences in T levels, motivation and lower-body power, which may reflect training and competitive factors in each group. Despite having lower T levels, the elite athletes showed better linkage between pre-training T fluctuations and subsequent motivation to train. The nature of the performance tests (i.e. single repetition trials) could partly explain the lack of an association with the hormonal and motivational measures.

AB - To advance our understanding of the hormonal contribution to athletic performance, we examined the temporal associations between individual changes in testosterone (T) and/or cortisol (C) concentrations, training motivation and physical performance in elite and non-elite trained men. Two male cohorts classified as elites (n = 12) and non-elites (n = 12) completed five testing sessions over a six-week period. The athletes were tested for salivary T, C, T/C ratio, self-perceived training motivation, countermovement jump (CMJ) height and isometric mid-thigh pull peak force (IMTP PF), after which an actual training workout was performed. The elite men reported higher motivation to train and they produced greater CMJ height overall, whereas the non-elites had higher pooled T levels (p < 0.05). No significant group differences in C concentrations, T/C ratio or IMTP PF were found. The individual changes in T levels were positively associated with training motivation in the elite men only (p = 0.033), but the hormonal and motivation measures did not predict CMJ height or IMTP PF in either group. The monitoring of elite and non-elite men across a short training block revealed differences in T levels, motivation and lower-body power, which may reflect training and competitive factors in each group. Despite having lower T levels, the elite athletes showed better linkage between pre-training T fluctuations and subsequent motivation to train. The nature of the performance tests (i.e. single repetition trials) could partly explain the lack of an association with the hormonal and motivational measures.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.5604/20831862.1201810

DO - 10.5604/20831862.1201810

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 215

EP - 221

JO - Biology of Sport

JF - Biology of Sport

SN - 0860-021X

IS - 3

ER -