Tertiary education students’ attitudes to the harmfulness of viewing and distributing child pornography

Jeremy Prichard, Caroline Spiranovic, Karen Gelb, Paul Watters, Tony KRONE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Little research has examined public support for criminalising viewing and distributing child exploitation material (CEM). Using an online survey of 431 undergraduate students from Australia, we explored perceptions of the harmfulness of CEM. The majority of respondents agreed that viewing and distributing CEM lead to further production and had a negative effect on victims. Although 93% of respondents agreed that CEM involving real child victims should be illegal, 22% did not agree that CEM involving pseudoimages should be illegal. Those who demonstrated higher levels of agreement with explanations of the harmfulness of CEM were more likely to be female, to have achieved postsecondary qualifications, to have never viewed pornography, to support censorship of pornography, and to believe that CEM involving pseudoimages of children should be illegal. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-239
Number of pages16
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Erotica
pornography
Students
exploitation
Education
education
student
censorship
public support
online survey
qualification

Cite this

Prichard, Jeremy ; Spiranovic, Caroline ; Gelb, Karen ; Watters, Paul ; KRONE, Tony. / Tertiary education students’ attitudes to the harmfulness of viewing and distributing child pornography. In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 224-239.
@article{2723fbec6eb84832b95f95769d555d19,
title = "Tertiary education students’ attitudes to the harmfulness of viewing and distributing child pornography",
abstract = "Little research has examined public support for criminalising viewing and distributing child exploitation material (CEM). Using an online survey of 431 undergraduate students from Australia, we explored perceptions of the harmfulness of CEM. The majority of respondents agreed that viewing and distributing CEM lead to further production and had a negative effect on victims. Although 93{\%} of respondents agreed that CEM involving real child victims should be illegal, 22{\%} did not agree that CEM involving pseudoimages should be illegal. Those who demonstrated higher levels of agreement with explanations of the harmfulness of CEM were more likely to be female, to have achieved postsecondary qualifications, to have never viewed pornography, to support censorship of pornography, and to believe that CEM involving pseudoimages of children should be illegal. The implications of these findings are discussed.",
author = "Jeremy Prichard and Caroline Spiranovic and Karen Gelb and Paul Watters and Tony KRONE",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13218719.2015.1042419",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "224--239",
journal = "Psychiatry, Psychology and Law",
issn = "1321-8719",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Tertiary education students’ attitudes to the harmfulness of viewing and distributing child pornography. / Prichard, Jeremy; Spiranovic, Caroline; Gelb, Karen; Watters, Paul; KRONE, Tony.

In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2016, p. 224-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tertiary education students’ attitudes to the harmfulness of viewing and distributing child pornography

AU - Prichard, Jeremy

AU - Spiranovic, Caroline

AU - Gelb, Karen

AU - Watters, Paul

AU - KRONE, Tony

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Little research has examined public support for criminalising viewing and distributing child exploitation material (CEM). Using an online survey of 431 undergraduate students from Australia, we explored perceptions of the harmfulness of CEM. The majority of respondents agreed that viewing and distributing CEM lead to further production and had a negative effect on victims. Although 93% of respondents agreed that CEM involving real child victims should be illegal, 22% did not agree that CEM involving pseudoimages should be illegal. Those who demonstrated higher levels of agreement with explanations of the harmfulness of CEM were more likely to be female, to have achieved postsecondary qualifications, to have never viewed pornography, to support censorship of pornography, and to believe that CEM involving pseudoimages of children should be illegal. The implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - Little research has examined public support for criminalising viewing and distributing child exploitation material (CEM). Using an online survey of 431 undergraduate students from Australia, we explored perceptions of the harmfulness of CEM. The majority of respondents agreed that viewing and distributing CEM lead to further production and had a negative effect on victims. Although 93% of respondents agreed that CEM involving real child victims should be illegal, 22% did not agree that CEM involving pseudoimages should be illegal. Those who demonstrated higher levels of agreement with explanations of the harmfulness of CEM were more likely to be female, to have achieved postsecondary qualifications, to have never viewed pornography, to support censorship of pornography, and to believe that CEM involving pseudoimages of children should be illegal. The implications of these findings are discussed.

U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2015.1042419

DO - 10.1080/13218719.2015.1042419

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 224

EP - 239

JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

SN - 1321-8719

IS - 2

ER -