Test agreement for classifying diabetes in indigenous Australians

Mark Daniel, Kevin G. Rowley, Elisabeth Marks, Kerin O'Dea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate for Indigenous Australians the agreement between a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criterion of 7.0 mmol/L and diabetes test results using a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), comparing relationships between test agreement and prevalence to similar studies. Methods: Screening was undertaken in 25 remote settlements. Agreement between FPG and OGTT results was evaluated using the kappa coefficient (chance-corrected agreement). Results: Participants (n=3,249) ranged from 15-94 years. Kappa ranged from 0.70-0.77 for diabetes prevalence of 5-30%, with overall agreement of 0.76. In comparison studies, the relationship between kappa and diabetes prevalence was similar, but with kappa 0.21-0.48. Conclusions and implications: A FPG test with a 7.0 mmol/L cut-off is a reliable screening method, relative to the OGTT, for remote Indigenous settlements. The level of agreement between the FPG test and the OGTT for the Indigenous population surveyed is superior by far to agreement reported for non-Indigenous samples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-131
Number of pages4
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume30
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glucose Tolerance Test
Fasting
Glucose
Population Groups

Cite this

Daniel, Mark ; Rowley, Kevin G. ; Marks, Elisabeth ; O'Dea, Kerin. / Test agreement for classifying diabetes in indigenous Australians. In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 128-131.
@article{e528e3b749094957a8f05fe3801940f3,
title = "Test agreement for classifying diabetes in indigenous Australians",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate for Indigenous Australians the agreement between a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criterion of 7.0 mmol/L and diabetes test results using a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), comparing relationships between test agreement and prevalence to similar studies. Methods: Screening was undertaken in 25 remote settlements. Agreement between FPG and OGTT results was evaluated using the kappa coefficient (chance-corrected agreement). Results: Participants (n=3,249) ranged from 15-94 years. Kappa ranged from 0.70-0.77 for diabetes prevalence of 5-30{\%}, with overall agreement of 0.76. In comparison studies, the relationship between kappa and diabetes prevalence was similar, but with kappa 0.21-0.48. Conclusions and implications: A FPG test with a 7.0 mmol/L cut-off is a reliable screening method, relative to the OGTT, for remote Indigenous settlements. The level of agreement between the FPG test and the OGTT for the Indigenous population surveyed is superior by far to agreement reported for non-Indigenous samples.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Blood Glucose, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans",
author = "Mark Daniel and Rowley, {Kevin G.} and Elisabeth Marks and Kerin O'Dea",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "128--131",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1326-0200",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Test agreement for classifying diabetes in indigenous Australians. / Daniel, Mark; Rowley, Kevin G.; Marks, Elisabeth; O'Dea, Kerin.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 30, No. 2, 04.2006, p. 128-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test agreement for classifying diabetes in indigenous Australians

AU - Daniel, Mark

AU - Rowley, Kevin G.

AU - Marks, Elisabeth

AU - O'Dea, Kerin

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Objective: To evaluate for Indigenous Australians the agreement between a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criterion of 7.0 mmol/L and diabetes test results using a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), comparing relationships between test agreement and prevalence to similar studies. Methods: Screening was undertaken in 25 remote settlements. Agreement between FPG and OGTT results was evaluated using the kappa coefficient (chance-corrected agreement). Results: Participants (n=3,249) ranged from 15-94 years. Kappa ranged from 0.70-0.77 for diabetes prevalence of 5-30%, with overall agreement of 0.76. In comparison studies, the relationship between kappa and diabetes prevalence was similar, but with kappa 0.21-0.48. Conclusions and implications: A FPG test with a 7.0 mmol/L cut-off is a reliable screening method, relative to the OGTT, for remote Indigenous settlements. The level of agreement between the FPG test and the OGTT for the Indigenous population surveyed is superior by far to agreement reported for non-Indigenous samples.

AB - Objective: To evaluate for Indigenous Australians the agreement between a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criterion of 7.0 mmol/L and diabetes test results using a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), comparing relationships between test agreement and prevalence to similar studies. Methods: Screening was undertaken in 25 remote settlements. Agreement between FPG and OGTT results was evaluated using the kappa coefficient (chance-corrected agreement). Results: Participants (n=3,249) ranged from 15-94 years. Kappa ranged from 0.70-0.77 for diabetes prevalence of 5-30%, with overall agreement of 0.76. In comparison studies, the relationship between kappa and diabetes prevalence was similar, but with kappa 0.21-0.48. Conclusions and implications: A FPG test with a 7.0 mmol/L cut-off is a reliable screening method, relative to the OGTT, for remote Indigenous settlements. The level of agreement between the FPG test and the OGTT for the Indigenous population surveyed is superior by far to agreement reported for non-Indigenous samples.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Blood Glucose

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Female

KW - Glucose Tolerance Test

KW - Humans

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646247867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 128

EP - 131

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

SN - 1326-0200

IS - 2

ER -