Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional and self-reported measures in elderly with osteoarthritis

Rachel C. Davey, Sarah Matthes Edwards, Tom Cochrane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability for a battery of lower limb functional and self-reported health measures [the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC in elderly with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or knee. A repeated-measures design was used, in which 21 patients repeated the same tests on two occasions less than 1 week apart. The physical function tests - 8-foot walking distance, stair ascend/descend and right quadriceps strength - demonstrated satisfactory reproducibility with percentage differences on retest ranging from 4% to 7%. The standard error of the measurement (SEM) indicated that these tests demonstrated moderate to good reliability. The hamstring flexor strength measures were unreliable with retest differences of between 16% and 22%. The dimensions of pain and physical function of the WOMAC and six of the eight SF-36 subscales met the standards required for comparing groups of patients. However, the scales measuring role limitation (mental and physical) of the SF-36 showed poor measurement characteristics with a 44% and 201% difference on retest, respectively. The SF-36 physical function and general health subscales together with the pain and physical function dimensions of the WOMAC may be suitable for use as patient self-assessment measures in conjunction with the timed walk and stair test for elderly with lower limb OA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-160
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Physiotherapy
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Osteoarthritis
Lower Extremity
Pain
Hip Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Health
Ontario
Walking

Cite this

@article{2881a29957d9422990c7f3cdd80c2852,
title = "Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional and self-reported measures in elderly with osteoarthritis",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability for a battery of lower limb functional and self-reported health measures [the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC in elderly with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or knee. A repeated-measures design was used, in which 21 patients repeated the same tests on two occasions less than 1 week apart. The physical function tests - 8-foot walking distance, stair ascend/descend and right quadriceps strength - demonstrated satisfactory reproducibility with percentage differences on retest ranging from 4{\%} to 7{\%}. The standard error of the measurement (SEM) indicated that these tests demonstrated moderate to good reliability. The hamstring flexor strength measures were unreliable with retest differences of between 16{\%} and 22{\%}. The dimensions of pain and physical function of the WOMAC and six of the eight SF-36 subscales met the standards required for comparing groups of patients. However, the scales measuring role limitation (mental and physical) of the SF-36 showed poor measurement characteristics with a 44{\%} and 201{\%} difference on retest, respectively. The SF-36 physical function and general health subscales together with the pain and physical function dimensions of the WOMAC may be suitable for use as patient self-assessment measures in conjunction with the timed walk and stair test for elderly with lower limb OA.",
keywords = "Hip, Knee outcomes, Performance-based, SF-36, WO-MAC",
author = "Davey, {Rachel C.} and Edwards, {Sarah Matthes} and Tom Cochrane",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1080/1403819038190310017075",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "155--160",
journal = "European Journal of Physiotherapy",
issn = "1403-8196",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional and self-reported measures in elderly with osteoarthritis. / Davey, Rachel C.; Edwards, Sarah Matthes; Cochrane, Tom.

In: European Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003, p. 155-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional and self-reported measures in elderly with osteoarthritis

AU - Davey, Rachel C.

AU - Edwards, Sarah Matthes

AU - Cochrane, Tom

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability for a battery of lower limb functional and self-reported health measures [the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC in elderly with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or knee. A repeated-measures design was used, in which 21 patients repeated the same tests on two occasions less than 1 week apart. The physical function tests - 8-foot walking distance, stair ascend/descend and right quadriceps strength - demonstrated satisfactory reproducibility with percentage differences on retest ranging from 4% to 7%. The standard error of the measurement (SEM) indicated that these tests demonstrated moderate to good reliability. The hamstring flexor strength measures were unreliable with retest differences of between 16% and 22%. The dimensions of pain and physical function of the WOMAC and six of the eight SF-36 subscales met the standards required for comparing groups of patients. However, the scales measuring role limitation (mental and physical) of the SF-36 showed poor measurement characteristics with a 44% and 201% difference on retest, respectively. The SF-36 physical function and general health subscales together with the pain and physical function dimensions of the WOMAC may be suitable for use as patient self-assessment measures in conjunction with the timed walk and stair test for elderly with lower limb OA.

AB - The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability for a battery of lower limb functional and self-reported health measures [the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC in elderly with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or knee. A repeated-measures design was used, in which 21 patients repeated the same tests on two occasions less than 1 week apart. The physical function tests - 8-foot walking distance, stair ascend/descend and right quadriceps strength - demonstrated satisfactory reproducibility with percentage differences on retest ranging from 4% to 7%. The standard error of the measurement (SEM) indicated that these tests demonstrated moderate to good reliability. The hamstring flexor strength measures were unreliable with retest differences of between 16% and 22%. The dimensions of pain and physical function of the WOMAC and six of the eight SF-36 subscales met the standards required for comparing groups of patients. However, the scales measuring role limitation (mental and physical) of the SF-36 showed poor measurement characteristics with a 44% and 201% difference on retest, respectively. The SF-36 physical function and general health subscales together with the pain and physical function dimensions of the WOMAC may be suitable for use as patient self-assessment measures in conjunction with the timed walk and stair test for elderly with lower limb OA.

KW - Hip

KW - Knee outcomes

KW - Performance-based

KW - SF-36

KW - WO-MAC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346338239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1403819038190310017075

DO - 10.1080/1403819038190310017075

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 155

EP - 160

JO - European Journal of Physiotherapy

JF - European Journal of Physiotherapy

SN - 1403-8196

IS - 4

ER -