‘That red flag on your file’: misinterpreting physical symptoms as mental illness

Brenda HAPPELL, Julia BOCKING, Chris PLATANIA-PHUNG, Robert Stanton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To ascertain the views and experiences of mental health consumers regarding the availability and quality of care and treatment received for their physical health needs. Background: People diagnosed with mental illness have higher occurrence of physical health problems. Responsive health care services are crucial for prevention and management of physical health problems, and for reducing disparities in health between people diagnosed with mental illness and those who are not. There is limited research giving voice to consumer perspectives on their experiences with health care providers. Design: Exploratory qualitative. Methods: Focus group interviews with mental health consumers accessed via a consumer network group in a region of Australia (n = 31). All interview audio recordings were transcribed professionally. Interviews were thematically analysed. Results: The main themes were: symptomising; failure to act and alertness to prejudice. The first two themes were consumer perceptions of the actions and behaviours of health professionals, and the third describes consumer responses to these behaviours and actions. Consumers described increased risks of illness and death because of undiagnosed physical illness despite their physical health advice-seeking as the reason for the health consultation. Conclusion: Health care providers’ non-recognition of physical health problems presents a clear example of a significant and potentially life threatening health inequity. The service provider responses described by participants suggest that mental health consumers’ physical health needs may not be taken seriously. Relevance to clinical practice: Clinicians need to take seriously the physical health needs and concerns of people with mental illness. Nurses can play a crucial role in the prevention of diagnostic overshadowing as part of a broader direction of balancing biomedical perspectives with other approaches to health care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2933-2942
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume25
Issue number19-20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Health
Mental Health
Interviews
Health Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Focus Groups
Health Services
Referral and Consultation
Nurses
Research

Cite this

HAPPELL, Brenda ; BOCKING, Julia ; PLATANIA-PHUNG, Chris ; Stanton, Robert. / ‘That red flag on your file’: misinterpreting physical symptoms as mental illness. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 19-20. pp. 2933-2942.
@article{182ccf76ac5245f796e55da6366e5910,
title = "‘That red flag on your file’: misinterpreting physical symptoms as mental illness",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To ascertain the views and experiences of mental health consumers regarding the availability and quality of care and treatment received for their physical health needs. Background: People diagnosed with mental illness have higher occurrence of physical health problems. Responsive health care services are crucial for prevention and management of physical health problems, and for reducing disparities in health between people diagnosed with mental illness and those who are not. There is limited research giving voice to consumer perspectives on their experiences with health care providers. Design: Exploratory qualitative. Methods: Focus group interviews with mental health consumers accessed via a consumer network group in a region of Australia (n = 31). All interview audio recordings were transcribed professionally. Interviews were thematically analysed. Results: The main themes were: symptomising; failure to act and alertness to prejudice. The first two themes were consumer perceptions of the actions and behaviours of health professionals, and the third describes consumer responses to these behaviours and actions. Consumers described increased risks of illness and death because of undiagnosed physical illness despite their physical health advice-seeking as the reason for the health consultation. Conclusion: Health care providers’ non-recognition of physical health problems presents a clear example of a significant and potentially life threatening health inequity. The service provider responses described by participants suggest that mental health consumers’ physical health needs may not be taken seriously. Relevance to clinical practice: Clinicians need to take seriously the physical health needs and concerns of people with mental illness. Nurses can play a crucial role in the prevention of diagnostic overshadowing as part of a broader direction of balancing biomedical perspectives with other approaches to health care.",
keywords = "consumer participation, diagnostic overshadowing, health care access, mental health nursing, mental health services, physical health, stigma",
author = "Brenda HAPPELL and Julia BOCKING and Chris PLATANIA-PHUNG and Robert Stanton",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.13355",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "2933--2942",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "19-20",

}

HAPPELL, B, BOCKING, J, PLATANIA-PHUNG, C & Stanton, R 2016, '‘That red flag on your file’: misinterpreting physical symptoms as mental illness', Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 25, no. 19-20, pp. 2933-2942. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13355

‘That red flag on your file’: misinterpreting physical symptoms as mental illness. / HAPPELL, Brenda; BOCKING, Julia; PLATANIA-PHUNG, Chris; Stanton, Robert.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 25, No. 19-20, 2016, p. 2933-2942.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘That red flag on your file’: misinterpreting physical symptoms as mental illness

AU - HAPPELL, Brenda

AU - BOCKING, Julia

AU - PLATANIA-PHUNG, Chris

AU - Stanton, Robert

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Aims and objectives: To ascertain the views and experiences of mental health consumers regarding the availability and quality of care and treatment received for their physical health needs. Background: People diagnosed with mental illness have higher occurrence of physical health problems. Responsive health care services are crucial for prevention and management of physical health problems, and for reducing disparities in health between people diagnosed with mental illness and those who are not. There is limited research giving voice to consumer perspectives on their experiences with health care providers. Design: Exploratory qualitative. Methods: Focus group interviews with mental health consumers accessed via a consumer network group in a region of Australia (n = 31). All interview audio recordings were transcribed professionally. Interviews were thematically analysed. Results: The main themes were: symptomising; failure to act and alertness to prejudice. The first two themes were consumer perceptions of the actions and behaviours of health professionals, and the third describes consumer responses to these behaviours and actions. Consumers described increased risks of illness and death because of undiagnosed physical illness despite their physical health advice-seeking as the reason for the health consultation. Conclusion: Health care providers’ non-recognition of physical health problems presents a clear example of a significant and potentially life threatening health inequity. The service provider responses described by participants suggest that mental health consumers’ physical health needs may not be taken seriously. Relevance to clinical practice: Clinicians need to take seriously the physical health needs and concerns of people with mental illness. Nurses can play a crucial role in the prevention of diagnostic overshadowing as part of a broader direction of balancing biomedical perspectives with other approaches to health care.

AB - Aims and objectives: To ascertain the views and experiences of mental health consumers regarding the availability and quality of care and treatment received for their physical health needs. Background: People diagnosed with mental illness have higher occurrence of physical health problems. Responsive health care services are crucial for prevention and management of physical health problems, and for reducing disparities in health between people diagnosed with mental illness and those who are not. There is limited research giving voice to consumer perspectives on their experiences with health care providers. Design: Exploratory qualitative. Methods: Focus group interviews with mental health consumers accessed via a consumer network group in a region of Australia (n = 31). All interview audio recordings were transcribed professionally. Interviews were thematically analysed. Results: The main themes were: symptomising; failure to act and alertness to prejudice. The first two themes were consumer perceptions of the actions and behaviours of health professionals, and the third describes consumer responses to these behaviours and actions. Consumers described increased risks of illness and death because of undiagnosed physical illness despite their physical health advice-seeking as the reason for the health consultation. Conclusion: Health care providers’ non-recognition of physical health problems presents a clear example of a significant and potentially life threatening health inequity. The service provider responses described by participants suggest that mental health consumers’ physical health needs may not be taken seriously. Relevance to clinical practice: Clinicians need to take seriously the physical health needs and concerns of people with mental illness. Nurses can play a crucial role in the prevention of diagnostic overshadowing as part of a broader direction of balancing biomedical perspectives with other approaches to health care.

KW - consumer participation

KW - diagnostic overshadowing

KW - health care access

KW - mental health nursing

KW - mental health services

KW - physical health

KW - stigma

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.13355

DO - 10.1111/jocn.13355

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 2933

EP - 2942

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 19-20

ER -