Thawing Out Personhood, Unconscionability and Succession in Cryonics

Bruce Baer Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The adoption of cryonics poses fruitful questions about personhood, consumer protection, trusts, taxation, crime, human rights and other law. Cryonics involves the long term storage of human cadavers at subzero temperatures with an expectation that in the indefinite future the legally dead will be ‘reanimated’. The article discusses the culture and law of cryonics in relation to Australia. It draws on Martha Fineman’s vulnerability theory to critique claims by proponents of cryonics, asking whether unsubstantiated claims regarding reanimation are unconscionable and necessitate a specific statutory prohibition. The article further considers the implications for health, welfare and other law if cryonics was practical.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-77
Number of pages35
JournalCanberra Law Review
Volume17
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thawing Out Personhood, Unconscionability and Succession in Cryonics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this