TY - JOUR
T1 - The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic
T2 - Pilot Questionnaire Study
AU - Patel, Shrujna
AU - Boulton, Kelsie Ann
AU - Hodge, Marie Antoinette
AU - Papanicolaou, Angela
AU - Barnett, Diana
AU - Bennett, Beverley
AU - Drevensek, Suzi
AU - Cramsie, Jane
AU - Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi
AU - Ong, Natalie
AU - Rozsa, Magdalen
AU - Silove, Natalie
AU - Sutherland, Rebecca
AU - Guastella, Adam
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NHMRC Project Grants (1125449 and 1043664) and a BUPA Foundation Grant to AG, a Research Training Program Scholarship to SP, and the Brain and Mind Centre Child Neurodevelopment and Mental Health Team.
Publisher Copyright:
© Shrujna Patel, Kelsie Ann Boulton, Marie Antoinette Redoblado-Hodge, Angela Papanicolaou, Diana Barnett, Beverley Bennett, Suzi Drevensek, Jane Cramsie, Kalaichelvi Ganesalingam, Natalie Ong, Magdalen Rozsa, Rebecca Sutherland, Marcia Williamsz, Izabella Pokorski, Yun Ju Christine Song, Natalie Silove, Adam John Guastella.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1/19
Y1 - 2021/1/19
N2 - Background: There is a growing need for cost-efficient and patient-centered approaches to support families in hospital-and community-based neurodevelopmental services. For such purposes, electronic data collection (EDC) may hold advantages over paper-based data collection. Such EDC approaches enable automated data collection for scoring and interpretation, saving time for clinicians and services and promoting more efficient service delivery.
Objective: This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of EDC for the Child Development Unit, a hospital-based diagnostic assessment clinic in the Sydney Children’s Hospital Network. Caregiver response rates and preference for EDC or paper-based methods were evaluated as well as the moderating role of demographic characteristics such as age, level of education, and ethnic background.
Methods: Families were sent either a paper-based questionnaire via post or an electronic mail link for completion before attending their first on-site clinic appointment for assessment. A total of 62 families were provided a paper version of the questionnaire, while 184 families were provided the online version of the same questionnaire.
Results: Completion rates of the questionnaire before the first appointment were significantly higher for EDC (164/184, 89.1%) in comparison to paper-based methods (24/62, 39%; P<. 001). Within the EDC group, a vast majority of respondents indicated a preference for completing the questionnaire online (151/173, 87.3%), compared to paper completion (22/173, 12.7%; P<. 001). Of the caregiver demographic characteristics, only the respondent’s level of education was associated …
AB - Background: There is a growing need for cost-efficient and patient-centered approaches to support families in hospital-and community-based neurodevelopmental services. For such purposes, electronic data collection (EDC) may hold advantages over paper-based data collection. Such EDC approaches enable automated data collection for scoring and interpretation, saving time for clinicians and services and promoting more efficient service delivery.
Objective: This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of EDC for the Child Development Unit, a hospital-based diagnostic assessment clinic in the Sydney Children’s Hospital Network. Caregiver response rates and preference for EDC or paper-based methods were evaluated as well as the moderating role of demographic characteristics such as age, level of education, and ethnic background.
Methods: Families were sent either a paper-based questionnaire via post or an electronic mail link for completion before attending their first on-site clinic appointment for assessment. A total of 62 families were provided a paper version of the questionnaire, while 184 families were provided the online version of the same questionnaire.
Results: Completion rates of the questionnaire before the first appointment were significantly higher for EDC (164/184, 89.1%) in comparison to paper-based methods (24/62, 39%; P<. 001). Within the EDC group, a vast majority of respondents indicated a preference for completing the questionnaire online (151/173, 87.3%), compared to paper completion (22/173, 12.7%; P<. 001). Of the caregiver demographic characteristics, only the respondent’s level of education was associated …
KW - Electronic data collection
KW - Family-centered care
KW - Hospital-based data collection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100450138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2196/18214
DO - 10.2196/18214
M3 - Article
SN - 2561-326X
VL - 5
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - JMIR formative research
JF - JMIR formative research
IS - 1
M1 - e18214
ER -