The American dream: who else but the young can revive it?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Many in the mainstream see the rise of populism and the victory of Donald J. Trump as a minor, transient, disturbance of the balance between stability and pluralism in liberal democracy, caused by a temporary economic setback promoting a cultural backlash in the shape of an emotionally driven nativism, traditionalism and antipolitics. For them, it will disappear again as soon as the economy recovers and progressive, reasonable and multicultural, postmaterialist values take charge of democracy again. In contrast, I argue that populism constitutes a serious threat to, perhaps the end of, American democracy as we know it, with its dream of creating a viable coupling between outward-looking progressivists and inward-looking traditionalists. The situation calls for the young to intervene and reinvigorate democracy. They have been nudged by neoliberals to express themselves and seek success above all else, and they feel in their everyday life the kind of anxiety and fear of failures that this can create. Consequently, they have invented new, flatter, less organized and more personalized ways of engaging, identifying and pursuing common concerns online and offline. This carries the germ of a new connective democracy breaking with both neoliberalism and populism in order to reboot the American dream.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)274-291
    Number of pages18
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume39
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    populism
    democracy
    nativism
    anxiety
    conservatism
    neoliberalism
    pluralism
    everyday life
    threat
    economy
    economics
    Values

    Cite this

    @article{597d3c2025ee4daab2a7335347377fed,
    title = "The American dream: who else but the young can revive it?",
    abstract = "Many in the mainstream see the rise of populism and the victory of Donald J. Trump as a minor, transient, disturbance of the balance between stability and pluralism in liberal democracy, caused by a temporary economic setback promoting a cultural backlash in the shape of an emotionally driven nativism, traditionalism and antipolitics. For them, it will disappear again as soon as the economy recovers and progressive, reasonable and multicultural, postmaterialist values take charge of democracy again. In contrast, I argue that populism constitutes a serious threat to, perhaps the end of, American democracy as we know it, with its dream of creating a viable coupling between outward-looking progressivists and inward-looking traditionalists. The situation calls for the young to intervene and reinvigorate democracy. They have been nudged by neoliberals to express themselves and seek success above all else, and they feel in their everyday life the kind of anxiety and fear of failures that this can create. Consequently, they have invented new, flatter, less organized and more personalized ways of engaging, identifying and pursuing common concerns online and offline. This carries the germ of a new connective democracy breaking with both neoliberalism and populism in order to reboot the American dream.",
    author = "Henrik BANG",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2018.1478409",
    language = "English",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "274--291",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    The American dream: who else but the young can revive it? / BANG, Henrik.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2018, p. 274-291.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The American dream: who else but the young can revive it?

    AU - BANG, Henrik

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - Many in the mainstream see the rise of populism and the victory of Donald J. Trump as a minor, transient, disturbance of the balance between stability and pluralism in liberal democracy, caused by a temporary economic setback promoting a cultural backlash in the shape of an emotionally driven nativism, traditionalism and antipolitics. For them, it will disappear again as soon as the economy recovers and progressive, reasonable and multicultural, postmaterialist values take charge of democracy again. In contrast, I argue that populism constitutes a serious threat to, perhaps the end of, American democracy as we know it, with its dream of creating a viable coupling between outward-looking progressivists and inward-looking traditionalists. The situation calls for the young to intervene and reinvigorate democracy. They have been nudged by neoliberals to express themselves and seek success above all else, and they feel in their everyday life the kind of anxiety and fear of failures that this can create. Consequently, they have invented new, flatter, less organized and more personalized ways of engaging, identifying and pursuing common concerns online and offline. This carries the germ of a new connective democracy breaking with both neoliberalism and populism in order to reboot the American dream.

    AB - Many in the mainstream see the rise of populism and the victory of Donald J. Trump as a minor, transient, disturbance of the balance between stability and pluralism in liberal democracy, caused by a temporary economic setback promoting a cultural backlash in the shape of an emotionally driven nativism, traditionalism and antipolitics. For them, it will disappear again as soon as the economy recovers and progressive, reasonable and multicultural, postmaterialist values take charge of democracy again. In contrast, I argue that populism constitutes a serious threat to, perhaps the end of, American democracy as we know it, with its dream of creating a viable coupling between outward-looking progressivists and inward-looking traditionalists. The situation calls for the young to intervene and reinvigorate democracy. They have been nudged by neoliberals to express themselves and seek success above all else, and they feel in their everyday life the kind of anxiety and fear of failures that this can create. Consequently, they have invented new, flatter, less organized and more personalized ways of engaging, identifying and pursuing common concerns online and offline. This carries the germ of a new connective democracy breaking with both neoliberalism and populism in order to reboot the American dream.

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2018.1478409

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2018.1478409

    M3 - Article

    VL - 39

    SP - 274

    EP - 291

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 3

    ER -