The analgesic effect of interferential therapy on clinical and experimentally induced pain

Abulkhair Beatti, Anton Rayner, Tina Souvlis, Lucy Chipchase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Interferential therapy (IFT) is one of the most popular modalities used by physiotherapists for the management and control of pain. Despite its widespread use, there remains debate surrounding its effectiveness. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the published literature on the effectiveness of IFT in reducing pain. Method: A literature search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Physiotherapy Evidence Based (PEDro) was performed. This review adhered only to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated IFT in the presence of a control group. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria of this review. One study evaluated the effect of IFT on clinical pain while remaining studies examined induced pain including thermal (cold and hot), ischemic, mechanical, and delayed onset of muscle soreness. No clear conclusion was withdrawn regarding the effectiveness of IFT on pain management due to the high variability in study design and deficiencies in methodological quality. The data were limited and contradicting and therefore, of equivocal support to the pain reduction effect of IFT. Conclusion: There is inadequate evidence to support the effectiveness of IFT in pain management. Clearly, there is a need for RCTs with high methodological quality to establish IFT efficacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-252
Number of pages10
JournalPhysical Therapy Reviews
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Analgesics
Pain
Pain Management
Randomized Controlled Trials
Therapeutics
MEDLARS
Physical Therapists
Myalgia
MEDLINE
Nursing
Hot Temperature
Databases
Control Groups
Health

Cite this

Beatti, Abulkhair ; Rayner, Anton ; Souvlis, Tina ; Chipchase, Lucy. / The analgesic effect of interferential therapy on clinical and experimentally induced pain. In: Physical Therapy Reviews. 2010 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 243-252.
@article{e0269e4442874a9c81de43e6edb10fdf,
title = "The analgesic effect of interferential therapy on clinical and experimentally induced pain",
abstract = "Background: Interferential therapy (IFT) is one of the most popular modalities used by physiotherapists for the management and control of pain. Despite its widespread use, there remains debate surrounding its effectiveness. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the published literature on the effectiveness of IFT in reducing pain. Method: A literature search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Physiotherapy Evidence Based (PEDro) was performed. This review adhered only to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated IFT in the presence of a control group. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria of this review. One study evaluated the effect of IFT on clinical pain while remaining studies examined induced pain including thermal (cold and hot), ischemic, mechanical, and delayed onset of muscle soreness. No clear conclusion was withdrawn regarding the effectiveness of IFT on pain management due to the high variability in study design and deficiencies in methodological quality. The data were limited and contradicting and therefore, of equivocal support to the pain reduction effect of IFT. Conclusion: There is inadequate evidence to support the effectiveness of IFT in pain management. Clearly, there is a need for RCTs with high methodological quality to establish IFT efficacy.",
keywords = "ANALGESIA, INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT, MODULATED CURRENT, PAIN, SYSTEMATIC REVIEW",
author = "Abulkhair Beatti and Anton Rayner and Tina Souvlis and Lucy Chipchase",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1179/174328810X12647087218992",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "243--252",
journal = "Physical Therapy Reviews",
issn = "1083-3196",
number = "4",

}

The analgesic effect of interferential therapy on clinical and experimentally induced pain. / Beatti, Abulkhair; Rayner, Anton; Souvlis, Tina; Chipchase, Lucy.

In: Physical Therapy Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2010, p. 243-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The analgesic effect of interferential therapy on clinical and experimentally induced pain

AU - Beatti, Abulkhair

AU - Rayner, Anton

AU - Souvlis, Tina

AU - Chipchase, Lucy

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background: Interferential therapy (IFT) is one of the most popular modalities used by physiotherapists for the management and control of pain. Despite its widespread use, there remains debate surrounding its effectiveness. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the published literature on the effectiveness of IFT in reducing pain. Method: A literature search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Physiotherapy Evidence Based (PEDro) was performed. This review adhered only to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated IFT in the presence of a control group. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria of this review. One study evaluated the effect of IFT on clinical pain while remaining studies examined induced pain including thermal (cold and hot), ischemic, mechanical, and delayed onset of muscle soreness. No clear conclusion was withdrawn regarding the effectiveness of IFT on pain management due to the high variability in study design and deficiencies in methodological quality. The data were limited and contradicting and therefore, of equivocal support to the pain reduction effect of IFT. Conclusion: There is inadequate evidence to support the effectiveness of IFT in pain management. Clearly, there is a need for RCTs with high methodological quality to establish IFT efficacy.

AB - Background: Interferential therapy (IFT) is one of the most popular modalities used by physiotherapists for the management and control of pain. Despite its widespread use, there remains debate surrounding its effectiveness. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the published literature on the effectiveness of IFT in reducing pain. Method: A literature search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Physiotherapy Evidence Based (PEDro) was performed. This review adhered only to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated IFT in the presence of a control group. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria of this review. One study evaluated the effect of IFT on clinical pain while remaining studies examined induced pain including thermal (cold and hot), ischemic, mechanical, and delayed onset of muscle soreness. No clear conclusion was withdrawn regarding the effectiveness of IFT on pain management due to the high variability in study design and deficiencies in methodological quality. The data were limited and contradicting and therefore, of equivocal support to the pain reduction effect of IFT. Conclusion: There is inadequate evidence to support the effectiveness of IFT in pain management. Clearly, there is a need for RCTs with high methodological quality to establish IFT efficacy.

KW - ANALGESIA

KW - INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT

KW - MODULATED CURRENT

KW - PAIN

KW - SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979024014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/174328810X12647087218992

DO - 10.1179/174328810X12647087218992

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 243

EP - 252

JO - Physical Therapy Reviews

JF - Physical Therapy Reviews

SN - 1083-3196

IS - 4

ER -