TY - JOUR
T1 - The assessment of physiotherapy practice is a robust measure of entry-level physiotherapy standards
T2 - Reliability and validity evidence from a large, representative sample
AU - Physiotherapy Clinical Education Research Collaborative (PCERC)
AU - Reubenson, Alan
AU - Ng, Leo
AU - Lawton, Vidya
AU - NAHON, Irmina
AU - Terry, Rebecca
AU - Baldwin, Claire
AU - Blackford, Julia
AU - Bond, Alex
AU - Corrigan, Rosemary
AU - Dalton, Megan
AU - Dario, Amabile Borges
AU - Donovan, Michael
AU - Dunwoodie, Ruth
AU - Dwyer, Genevieve M
AU - Forbes, Roma
AU - Francis-Cracknell, Alison
AU - Gill, Janelle
AU - Jones, Taryn
AU - Jones, Anne
AU - Judd, Belinda
AU - Kennedy, Ewan
AU - Morgan, Prue
AU - Palmer, Tanya
AU - Peiris, Casey
AU - Taylor, Carolyn
AU - Virtue, Debra
AU - Zischke, Cherie
AU - Gucciardi, Daniel F
N1 - Copyright: © 2025 Reubenson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Reubenson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025/4/18
Y1 - 2025/4/18
N2 - The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a 20-item assessment instrument used to assess entry-level physiotherapy practice in Australia, New Zealand and other international locations. Initial APP reliability and validity evidence supported a unidimensional or single latent factor as the best representation of entry-level physiotherapy practice performance. However, there remains inconsistency in how the APP is interpreted and operationalised across Australian and New Zealand universities offering entry-level physiotherapy programs. In essence, the presumption that the psychometric integrity of the APP generalises across people, time, and contexts remains largely untested. This multi-site, archival replication study utilised APP assessment data from 8,979 clinical placement assessments, across 19 Australian and New Zealand universities, graduating entry-level physiotherapy students (n=1865) in 2019. Structural representation of APP scores were examined via confirmatory factor analysis and penalised structural equation models. Factor analyses indicated a 2-factor representation, with four items (1-4) for the professional dimension and 16 items (5-20) for the clinical dimension, is the best approximation of entry-level physiotherapy performance. Measurement invariance analyses supported the robustness of this 2-factor representation over time and across diverse practice areas in both penultimate and final years of study.The findings provide strong evidence for the psychometric integrity of the APP, and the 2-factor alternative interpretation and operationalisation is recommended. To meet entry-level standards students should be assessed as competent across both professional and clinical dimensions of physiotherapy practice.
AB - The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a 20-item assessment instrument used to assess entry-level physiotherapy practice in Australia, New Zealand and other international locations. Initial APP reliability and validity evidence supported a unidimensional or single latent factor as the best representation of entry-level physiotherapy practice performance. However, there remains inconsistency in how the APP is interpreted and operationalised across Australian and New Zealand universities offering entry-level physiotherapy programs. In essence, the presumption that the psychometric integrity of the APP generalises across people, time, and contexts remains largely untested. This multi-site, archival replication study utilised APP assessment data from 8,979 clinical placement assessments, across 19 Australian and New Zealand universities, graduating entry-level physiotherapy students (n=1865) in 2019. Structural representation of APP scores were examined via confirmatory factor analysis and penalised structural equation models. Factor analyses indicated a 2-factor representation, with four items (1-4) for the professional dimension and 16 items (5-20) for the clinical dimension, is the best approximation of entry-level physiotherapy performance. Measurement invariance analyses supported the robustness of this 2-factor representation over time and across diverse practice areas in both penultimate and final years of study.The findings provide strong evidence for the psychometric integrity of the APP, and the 2-factor alternative interpretation and operationalisation is recommended. To meet entry-level standards students should be assessed as competent across both professional and clinical dimensions of physiotherapy practice.
KW - Humans
KW - Australia
KW - New Zealand
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Physical Therapy Modalities/standards
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Adult
KW - Physical Therapists
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Universities
KW - Physical Therapy Specialty/standards
KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical
KW - Young Adult
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003035818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0321397
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0321397
M3 - Article
C2 - 40249749
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 4
M1 - e0321397
ER -