Abstract
The authors of the ELSIcon special issue have advanced the conversation on ethics and genetics. Nevertheless, we have some concerns. Here, we respond specifically to Conley et al. (2023). We choose to do so because we are the group the article refers to as practising a form of public engagement “that seeks community perspectives to advance equity.” We organized the Australian Citizens’ Jury on Genome Editing (ACJ) and initiated the proposal for a Global Citizens’ Assembly on Genome Editing (GCA), both of which featured prominently in the article. We are also the lead authors of seven articles cited by Conley et al.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-63 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | American Journal of Bioethics |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jun 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Australian Citizens’ Jury and Global Citizens’ Assembly on Genome Editing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver