The british political tradition and the material-ideational debate

David MARSH, Matthew Hall

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Recently there has been a revival of interest in debates about the British political tradition. In part, this is a reflection of the 'ideational turn' in Anglophone comparative politics. However, this ideational turn immediately raises two of the most important meta-theoretical debates in social science; the relationships between institutions and ideas and the material and the ideational. In our view, anyone who suggests that political traditions shape political outcomes has to take a position on these debates, although they are rarely addressed. This article seeks to address that omission. We argue that, while the predominant ideas about democracy and political practice in the UK, what we term the British Political Tradition, do affect the institutions and processes of government, these ideas exist in a dialectical relationship with those institutions and, more broadly, with the material context within which the tradition, and indeed the institutions, operate(s).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-142
    Number of pages18
    JournalThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations
    Volume18
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    democracy
    politics
    social science
    material

    Cite this

    @article{7f496c46e6dd4544b37237164a013c03,
    title = "The british political tradition and the material-ideational debate",
    abstract = "Recently there has been a revival of interest in debates about the British political tradition. In part, this is a reflection of the 'ideational turn' in Anglophone comparative politics. However, this ideational turn immediately raises two of the most important meta-theoretical debates in social science; the relationships between institutions and ideas and the material and the ideational. In our view, anyone who suggests that political traditions shape political outcomes has to take a position on these debates, although they are rarely addressed. This article seeks to address that omission. We argue that, while the predominant ideas about democracy and political practice in the UK, what we term the British Political Tradition, do affect the institutions and processes of government, these ideas exist in a dialectical relationship with those institutions and, more broadly, with the material context within which the tradition, and indeed the institutions, operate(s).",
    author = "David MARSH and Matthew Hall",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1111/1467-856X.12077",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "125--142",
    journal = "British Journal of Politics and International Relations",
    issn = "1369-1481",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    The british political tradition and the material-ideational debate. / MARSH, David; Hall, Matthew.

    In: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2016, p. 125-142.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The british political tradition and the material-ideational debate

    AU - MARSH, David

    AU - Hall, Matthew

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Recently there has been a revival of interest in debates about the British political tradition. In part, this is a reflection of the 'ideational turn' in Anglophone comparative politics. However, this ideational turn immediately raises two of the most important meta-theoretical debates in social science; the relationships between institutions and ideas and the material and the ideational. In our view, anyone who suggests that political traditions shape political outcomes has to take a position on these debates, although they are rarely addressed. This article seeks to address that omission. We argue that, while the predominant ideas about democracy and political practice in the UK, what we term the British Political Tradition, do affect the institutions and processes of government, these ideas exist in a dialectical relationship with those institutions and, more broadly, with the material context within which the tradition, and indeed the institutions, operate(s).

    AB - Recently there has been a revival of interest in debates about the British political tradition. In part, this is a reflection of the 'ideational turn' in Anglophone comparative politics. However, this ideational turn immediately raises two of the most important meta-theoretical debates in social science; the relationships between institutions and ideas and the material and the ideational. In our view, anyone who suggests that political traditions shape political outcomes has to take a position on these debates, although they are rarely addressed. This article seeks to address that omission. We argue that, while the predominant ideas about democracy and political practice in the UK, what we term the British Political Tradition, do affect the institutions and processes of government, these ideas exist in a dialectical relationship with those institutions and, more broadly, with the material context within which the tradition, and indeed the institutions, operate(s).

    U2 - 10.1111/1467-856X.12077

    DO - 10.1111/1467-856X.12077

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 125

    EP - 142

    JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

    JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

    SN - 1369-1481

    IS - 1

    ER -