The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time-bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019–2020 Australian megafires

Sarah Legge, Libby Rumpff, John C.Z. Woinarski, Nick S. Whiterod, Michelle Ward, Darren G. Southwell, Ben C. Scheele, Dale G. Nimmo, Mark Lintermans, Hayley M. Geyle, Stephen T. Garnett, Brittany Hayward-Brown, Miki Ensbey, Glenn Ehmke, Shane T. Ahyong, Caroline J. Blackmore, Deborah S. Bower, Diego Brizuela-Torres, Allan H. Burbidge, Phoebe A. BurnsGavin Butler, Renee Catullo, David G. Chapple, Christopher R. Dickman, Katherine E. Doyle, Jason Ferris, Diana Fisher, Rachael Gallagher, Graeme R. Gillespie, Matt J. Greenlees, Rosie Hohnen, Conrad J. Hoskin, David Hunter, Chris Jolly, Mark Kennard, Alison King, Diana Kuchinke, Brad Law, Ivan Lawler, Susan Lawler, Richard Loyn, Daniel Lunney, Jarod Lyon, Josephine MacHunter, Michael Mahony, Stephen Mahony, Rob B. McCormack, Jane Melville, Peter Menkhorst, Damian Michael, Nicola Mitchell, Eri Mulder, David Newell, Luke Pearce, Tarmo A. Raadik, Jodi J.L. Rowley, Holly Sitters, Ricky Spencer, Roozbeh Valavi, Matt West, David P. Wilkinson, Sylvia Zukowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)


Aim: After environmental disasters, species with large population losses may need urgent protection to prevent extinction and support recovery. Following the 2019–2020 Australian megafires, we estimated population losses and recovery in fire-affected fauna, to inform conservation status assessments and management. Location: Temperate and subtropical Australia. Time period: 2019–2030 and beyond. Major taxa: Australian terrestrial and freshwater vertebrates; one invertebrate group. Methods: From > 1,050 fire-affected taxa, we selected 173 whose distributions substantially overlapped the fire extent. We estimated the proportion of each taxon’s distribution affected by fires, using fire severity and aquatic impact mapping, and new distribution mapping. Using expert elicitation informed by evidence of responses to previous wildfires, we estimated local population responses to fires of varying severity. We combined the spatial and elicitation data to estimate overall population loss and recovery trajectories, and thus indicate potential eligibility for listing as threatened, or uplisting, under Australian legislation. Results: We estimate that the 2019–2020 Australian megafires caused, or contributed to, population declines that make 70–82 taxa eligible for listing as threatened; and another 21–27 taxa eligible for uplisting. If so-listed, this represents a 22–26% increase in Australian statutory lists of threatened terrestrial and freshwater vertebrates and spiny crayfish, and uplisting for 8–10% of threatened taxa. Such changes would cause an abrupt worsening of underlying trajectories in vertebrates, as measured by Red List Indices. We predict that 54–88% of 173 assessed taxa will not recover to pre-fire population size within 10 years/three generations. Main conclusions: We suggest the 2019–2020 Australian megafires have worsened the conservation prospects for many species. Of the 91 taxa recommended for listing/uplisting consideration, 84 are now under formal review through national processes. Improving predictions about taxon vulnerability with empirical data on population responses, reducing the likelihood of future catastrophic events and mitigating their impacts on biodiversity, are critical.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2085-2104
Number of pages20
JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022


Dive into the research topics of 'The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time-bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019–2020 Australian megafires'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this