The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: Avian assemblages in the box-ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia

Ralph MAC NALLY, T.R. Soderquist, C. Tzaros

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    53 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Drainage lines and shallow gullies generally have different microclimates and hence flora to surrounding upland ridges and slopes (abbreviated throughout as ‘ridges'). Gullies often have mesic, or at least less xeric, conditions compared with surrounding ridges. Gullies are frequently subjected to greater human impacts, such as clearance for agriculture, logging, grazing-damage and mining for alluvial deposits. We tested the hypothesis that mesic gullies in the generally dry (400–700 mm precipitation p. a.) box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia, harbour a richer and different avifauna to surrounding ridges. Ten pairs of adjacent gullies and ridge sites were surveyed eight times over 1 year. Species richness was one-third greater in gullies than in ridges, while mean total densities of birds were almost twice as great. Assemblage composition also differed significantly, which reflected: (1) significantly different densities of those species common to both gullies and ridges (several more abundant in gullies, some more abundant in ridges); and (2) differences in composition wherein some species occurred only in one or the other habitat, even though pairs of gullies/ridges were only 400–1900 m apart. These results indicate that avian assemblages within gullies are distinct from those in ridges and slopes, and that integrated management is required to conserve the entire avifauna of these dry forests and woodlands. The depletion of gully habitats through human disturbance makes prescriptive management of gullies the highest priority at present.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)293-302
    Number of pages10
    JournalBiological Conservation
    Volume93
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    dry forest
    dry forests
    gully
    ecosystems
    ecosystem
    avifauna
    ravines
    Victoria (Australia)
    alluvium
    dry environmental conditions
    habitat
    microclimate
    habitats
    anthropogenic effect
    alluvial deposit
    logging
    anthropogenic activities
    woodlands
    woodland
    drainage

    Cite this

    @article{12fb62d3d465472c9301431dbe800fe7,
    title = "The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: Avian assemblages in the box-ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia",
    abstract = "Drainage lines and shallow gullies generally have different microclimates and hence flora to surrounding upland ridges and slopes (abbreviated throughout as ‘ridges'). Gullies often have mesic, or at least less xeric, conditions compared with surrounding ridges. Gullies are frequently subjected to greater human impacts, such as clearance for agriculture, logging, grazing-damage and mining for alluvial deposits. We tested the hypothesis that mesic gullies in the generally dry (400–700 mm precipitation p. a.) box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia, harbour a richer and different avifauna to surrounding ridges. Ten pairs of adjacent gullies and ridge sites were surveyed eight times over 1 year. Species richness was one-third greater in gullies than in ridges, while mean total densities of birds were almost twice as great. Assemblage composition also differed significantly, which reflected: (1) significantly different densities of those species common to both gullies and ridges (several more abundant in gullies, some more abundant in ridges); and (2) differences in composition wherein some species occurred only in one or the other habitat, even though pairs of gullies/ridges were only 400–1900 m apart. These results indicate that avian assemblages within gullies are distinct from those in ridges and slopes, and that integrated management is required to conserve the entire avifauna of these dry forests and woodlands. The depletion of gully habitats through human disturbance makes prescriptive management of gullies the highest priority at present.",
    author = "{MAC NALLY}, Ralph and T.R. Soderquist and C. Tzaros",
    note = "Cited By :46 Export Date: 6 June 2017",
    year = "2000",
    doi = "10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00154-8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "93",
    pages = "293--302",
    journal = "Biological Conservation",
    issn = "0006-3207",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",
    number = "3",

    }

    The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: Avian assemblages in the box-ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia. / MAC NALLY, Ralph; Soderquist, T.R.; Tzaros, C.

    In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2000, p. 293-302.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: Avian assemblages in the box-ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia

    AU - MAC NALLY, Ralph

    AU - Soderquist, T.R.

    AU - Tzaros, C.

    N1 - Cited By :46 Export Date: 6 June 2017

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - Drainage lines and shallow gullies generally have different microclimates and hence flora to surrounding upland ridges and slopes (abbreviated throughout as ‘ridges'). Gullies often have mesic, or at least less xeric, conditions compared with surrounding ridges. Gullies are frequently subjected to greater human impacts, such as clearance for agriculture, logging, grazing-damage and mining for alluvial deposits. We tested the hypothesis that mesic gullies in the generally dry (400–700 mm precipitation p. a.) box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia, harbour a richer and different avifauna to surrounding ridges. Ten pairs of adjacent gullies and ridge sites were surveyed eight times over 1 year. Species richness was one-third greater in gullies than in ridges, while mean total densities of birds were almost twice as great. Assemblage composition also differed significantly, which reflected: (1) significantly different densities of those species common to both gullies and ridges (several more abundant in gullies, some more abundant in ridges); and (2) differences in composition wherein some species occurred only in one or the other habitat, even though pairs of gullies/ridges were only 400–1900 m apart. These results indicate that avian assemblages within gullies are distinct from those in ridges and slopes, and that integrated management is required to conserve the entire avifauna of these dry forests and woodlands. The depletion of gully habitats through human disturbance makes prescriptive management of gullies the highest priority at present.

    AB - Drainage lines and shallow gullies generally have different microclimates and hence flora to surrounding upland ridges and slopes (abbreviated throughout as ‘ridges'). Gullies often have mesic, or at least less xeric, conditions compared with surrounding ridges. Gullies are frequently subjected to greater human impacts, such as clearance for agriculture, logging, grazing-damage and mining for alluvial deposits. We tested the hypothesis that mesic gullies in the generally dry (400–700 mm precipitation p. a.) box–ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia, harbour a richer and different avifauna to surrounding ridges. Ten pairs of adjacent gullies and ridge sites were surveyed eight times over 1 year. Species richness was one-third greater in gullies than in ridges, while mean total densities of birds were almost twice as great. Assemblage composition also differed significantly, which reflected: (1) significantly different densities of those species common to both gullies and ridges (several more abundant in gullies, some more abundant in ridges); and (2) differences in composition wherein some species occurred only in one or the other habitat, even though pairs of gullies/ridges were only 400–1900 m apart. These results indicate that avian assemblages within gullies are distinct from those in ridges and slopes, and that integrated management is required to conserve the entire avifauna of these dry forests and woodlands. The depletion of gully habitats through human disturbance makes prescriptive management of gullies the highest priority at present.

    U2 - 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00154-8

    DO - 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00154-8

    M3 - Article

    VL - 93

    SP - 293

    EP - 302

    JO - Biological Conservation

    JF - Biological Conservation

    SN - 0006-3207

    IS - 3

    ER -