The contribution of deliberative forums to studying welfare state attitudes: A United Kingdom study

Peter Taylor-Gooby, Heejung Chung, Benjamin Leruth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article introduces democratic forums as a method of studying attitudes towards the welfare state, and sets out briefly its strengths and weaknesses in comparison with existing methods. This is done by reporting the findings of a 2015 two-day forum based in the United Kingdom, in which the future of the welfare state was discussed by a largely representative sample of participants. The results show that participants linked both moral and economic arguments to come to two major framings that could encompass the debates surrounding the future of welfare states. One focuses on the inefficiencies of the welfare state, which found that welfare resources were largely misdirected and unsustainable. The other focuses on the possibilities for improving it via social investment, for example providing individuals with better training and education opportunities. The democratic forum method is helpful in allowing researchers to investigate the conceptual framings people use when thinking about the welfare state, and to see how people link different concepts and justifications together to argue their position. We argue that such framing can be distinct from that used and understood by policymakers and academics, and those applied in the more commonly used large scale surveys.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)914-927
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

welfare state
education and training
social investment
resource
economics
welfare
method
resources
education
comparison

Cite this

Taylor-Gooby, Peter ; Chung, Heejung ; Leruth, Benjamin. / The contribution of deliberative forums to studying welfare state attitudes: A United Kingdom study. In: Social Policy and Administration. 2018 ; Vol. 52, No. 4. pp. 914-927.
@article{47691e926679481b97e713e9bb6a07ff,
title = "The contribution of deliberative forums to studying welfare state attitudes: A United Kingdom study",
abstract = "This article introduces democratic forums as a method of studying attitudes towards the welfare state, and sets out briefly its strengths and weaknesses in comparison with existing methods. This is done by reporting the findings of a 2015 two-day forum based in the United Kingdom, in which the future of the welfare state was discussed by a largely representative sample of participants. The results show that participants linked both moral and economic arguments to come to two major framings that could encompass the debates surrounding the future of welfare states. One focuses on the inefficiencies of the welfare state, which found that welfare resources were largely misdirected and unsustainable. The other focuses on the possibilities for improving it via social investment, for example providing individuals with better training and education opportunities. The democratic forum method is helpful in allowing researchers to investigate the conceptual framings people use when thinking about the welfare state, and to see how people link different concepts and justifications together to argue their position. We argue that such framing can be distinct from that used and understood by policymakers and academics, and those applied in the more commonly used large scale surveys.",
keywords = "attitudes, democratic forums, framing, methods, United Kingdom, welfare state",
author = "Peter Taylor-Gooby and Heejung Chung and Benjamin Leruth",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12405",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "914--927",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

The contribution of deliberative forums to studying welfare state attitudes: A United Kingdom study. / Taylor-Gooby, Peter; Chung, Heejung; Leruth, Benjamin.

In: Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 52, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 914-927.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contribution of deliberative forums to studying welfare state attitudes: A United Kingdom study

AU - Taylor-Gooby, Peter

AU - Chung, Heejung

AU - Leruth, Benjamin

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - This article introduces democratic forums as a method of studying attitudes towards the welfare state, and sets out briefly its strengths and weaknesses in comparison with existing methods. This is done by reporting the findings of a 2015 two-day forum based in the United Kingdom, in which the future of the welfare state was discussed by a largely representative sample of participants. The results show that participants linked both moral and economic arguments to come to two major framings that could encompass the debates surrounding the future of welfare states. One focuses on the inefficiencies of the welfare state, which found that welfare resources were largely misdirected and unsustainable. The other focuses on the possibilities for improving it via social investment, for example providing individuals with better training and education opportunities. The democratic forum method is helpful in allowing researchers to investigate the conceptual framings people use when thinking about the welfare state, and to see how people link different concepts and justifications together to argue their position. We argue that such framing can be distinct from that used and understood by policymakers and academics, and those applied in the more commonly used large scale surveys.

AB - This article introduces democratic forums as a method of studying attitudes towards the welfare state, and sets out briefly its strengths and weaknesses in comparison with existing methods. This is done by reporting the findings of a 2015 two-day forum based in the United Kingdom, in which the future of the welfare state was discussed by a largely representative sample of participants. The results show that participants linked both moral and economic arguments to come to two major framings that could encompass the debates surrounding the future of welfare states. One focuses on the inefficiencies of the welfare state, which found that welfare resources were largely misdirected and unsustainable. The other focuses on the possibilities for improving it via social investment, for example providing individuals with better training and education opportunities. The democratic forum method is helpful in allowing researchers to investigate the conceptual framings people use when thinking about the welfare state, and to see how people link different concepts and justifications together to argue their position. We argue that such framing can be distinct from that used and understood by policymakers and academics, and those applied in the more commonly used large scale surveys.

KW - attitudes

KW - democratic forums

KW - framing

KW - methods

KW - United Kingdom

KW - welfare state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045875349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12405

DO - 10.1111/spol.12405

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 914

EP - 927

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 4

ER -