The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs

Tim Thomas, Susan Thwaites

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

Abstract

What are we doing when we do research? We can find a strong and established research method in the sciences, social sciences and humanities. In the creative arts, if we look to the intersections of art and technology, at the development of tools and process, we can find similar methods. All these methods start with an observation that prompts a question, or a proposition, then, by following the research method we get to a stage at which we feel confident that we can make a statement. Practice led research as a term, suggests something different. It is taken up by academic artists and creative practitioners to describe a form of research that, whilst it is different to the research that we find in the sciences, social sciences and humanities, is no less legitimate. Art practice creates statements in the form of works of art whilst science practice creates statements in the form conclusions drawn from data obtained during the research process. This sounds like a good match until we ask what makes a good science statement and what makes a good art statement. For science we have a small number of significant criteria. Top of the list is testability, is it possible to refute the statement. In art it is not so easy I can’t for example demonstrate that a work of art as a statement is wrong. This paper is about research, and comes out of the early stages of a project in which the researchers plan to answer some questions by making a fiction film. Not the least of these questions is, what are the research outputs of this creative project ?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference
EditorsGordon Bull
Place of PublicationAustralia
PublisherACUADS
Pages1-9
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9780975836071
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventAustralian Council of Arts and Design Schools 2011 Conference - Canberra, Australia
Duration: 21 Sep 201123 Sep 2011

Conference

ConferenceAustralian Council of Arts and Design Schools 2011 Conference
CountryAustralia
CityCanberra
Period21/09/1123/09/11

Fingerprint

Art
Social Sciences
Works of Art
Research Methods
Sound
Artist
Prompts
Creative Arts
Testability
Art and Technology
Fiction

Cite this

Thomas, T., & Thwaites, S. (2011). The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs. In G. Bull (Ed.), Proceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference (pp. 1-9). Australia: ACUADS.
Thomas, Tim ; Thwaites, Susan. / The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs. Proceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference. editor / Gordon Bull. Australia : ACUADS, 2011. pp. 1-9
@inproceedings{3d3f0bf1420f4040b24504403ebaf993,
title = "The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs",
abstract = "What are we doing when we do research? We can find a strong and established research method in the sciences, social sciences and humanities. In the creative arts, if we look to the intersections of art and technology, at the development of tools and process, we can find similar methods. All these methods start with an observation that prompts a question, or a proposition, then, by following the research method we get to a stage at which we feel confident that we can make a statement. Practice led research as a term, suggests something different. It is taken up by academic artists and creative practitioners to describe a form of research that, whilst it is different to the research that we find in the sciences, social sciences and humanities, is no less legitimate. Art practice creates statements in the form of works of art whilst science practice creates statements in the form conclusions drawn from data obtained during the research process. This sounds like a good match until we ask what makes a good science statement and what makes a good art statement. For science we have a small number of significant criteria. Top of the list is testability, is it possible to refute the statement. In art it is not so easy I can’t for example demonstrate that a work of art as a statement is wrong. This paper is about research, and comes out of the early stages of a project in which the researchers plan to answer some questions by making a fiction film. Not the least of these questions is, what are the research outputs of this creative project ?",
keywords = "Screen, Production, Practice",
author = "Tim Thomas and Susan Thwaites",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780975836071",
pages = "1--9",
editor = "Gordon Bull",
booktitle = "Proceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference",
publisher = "ACUADS",

}

Thomas, T & Thwaites, S 2011, The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs. in G Bull (ed.), Proceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference. ACUADS, Australia, pp. 1-9, Australian Council of Arts and Design Schools 2011 Conference, Canberra, Australia, 21/09/11.

The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs. / Thomas, Tim; Thwaites, Susan.

Proceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference. ed. / Gordon Bull. Australia : ACUADS, 2011. p. 1-9.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs

AU - Thomas, Tim

AU - Thwaites, Susan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - What are we doing when we do research? We can find a strong and established research method in the sciences, social sciences and humanities. In the creative arts, if we look to the intersections of art and technology, at the development of tools and process, we can find similar methods. All these methods start with an observation that prompts a question, or a proposition, then, by following the research method we get to a stage at which we feel confident that we can make a statement. Practice led research as a term, suggests something different. It is taken up by academic artists and creative practitioners to describe a form of research that, whilst it is different to the research that we find in the sciences, social sciences and humanities, is no less legitimate. Art practice creates statements in the form of works of art whilst science practice creates statements in the form conclusions drawn from data obtained during the research process. This sounds like a good match until we ask what makes a good science statement and what makes a good art statement. For science we have a small number of significant criteria. Top of the list is testability, is it possible to refute the statement. In art it is not so easy I can’t for example demonstrate that a work of art as a statement is wrong. This paper is about research, and comes out of the early stages of a project in which the researchers plan to answer some questions by making a fiction film. Not the least of these questions is, what are the research outputs of this creative project ?

AB - What are we doing when we do research? We can find a strong and established research method in the sciences, social sciences and humanities. In the creative arts, if we look to the intersections of art and technology, at the development of tools and process, we can find similar methods. All these methods start with an observation that prompts a question, or a proposition, then, by following the research method we get to a stage at which we feel confident that we can make a statement. Practice led research as a term, suggests something different. It is taken up by academic artists and creative practitioners to describe a form of research that, whilst it is different to the research that we find in the sciences, social sciences and humanities, is no less legitimate. Art practice creates statements in the form of works of art whilst science practice creates statements in the form conclusions drawn from data obtained during the research process. This sounds like a good match until we ask what makes a good science statement and what makes a good art statement. For science we have a small number of significant criteria. Top of the list is testability, is it possible to refute the statement. In art it is not so easy I can’t for example demonstrate that a work of art as a statement is wrong. This paper is about research, and comes out of the early stages of a project in which the researchers plan to answer some questions by making a fiction film. Not the least of these questions is, what are the research outputs of this creative project ?

KW - Screen

KW - Production

KW - Practice

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780975836071

SP - 1

EP - 9

BT - Proceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference

A2 - Bull, Gordon

PB - ACUADS

CY - Australia

ER -

Thomas T, Thwaites S. The Creative Researcher in Search of Outputs. In Bull G, editor, Proceedings of 'Creativity: brain, mind, body', the 2011 Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools (ACUADS) Annual Conference. Australia: ACUADS. 2011. p. 1-9