The Deliberative Democrat’s Idea of Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice, democracy is necessary for the reconciliation of plural justice claims. Sen’s treatment of democracy is however incomplete and inadequate: democracy is under-specified, there are unrecognized difficulties in any context featuring deep moral disagreement or deep division and a conceptualization of public reason in the singular erodes his pluralism. These faults undermine Sen’s account of justice. Developments in the theory of deliberative democracy can be deployed to remedy these deficiencies. This deployment points to a deliberative system encompassing those affected by collective decisions, with places for non-partisan forums and discursive representatives, conditionally open to multiple forms of communication, and geared to the production of workable agreements under normative and discursive meta-consensus. Democracy does not guarantee justice, but in a plural world it is essential to the pursuit of justice
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-346
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal of Political theory
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

justice
democracy
collective decision
deliberative democracy
reconciliation
pluralism
remedies
guarantee
communication

Cite this

@article{780788556c6144ecada0b678b98fe7ae,
title = "The Deliberative Democrat’s Idea of Justice",
abstract = "In Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice, democracy is necessary for the reconciliation of plural justice claims. Sen’s treatment of democracy is however incomplete and inadequate: democracy is under-specified, there are unrecognized difficulties in any context featuring deep moral disagreement or deep division and a conceptualization of public reason in the singular erodes his pluralism. These faults undermine Sen’s account of justice. Developments in the theory of deliberative democracy can be deployed to remedy these deficiencies. This deployment points to a deliberative system encompassing those affected by collective decisions, with places for non-partisan forums and discursive representatives, conditionally open to multiple forms of communication, and geared to the production of workable agreements under normative and discursive meta-consensus. Democracy does not guarantee justice, but in a plural world it is essential to the pursuit of justice",
author = "John DRYZEK",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/1474885112466784",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "329--346",
journal = "European Journal of Political theory",
issn = "1474-8851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

The Deliberative Democrat’s Idea of Justice. / DRYZEK, John.

In: European Journal of Political theory, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2013, p. 329-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Deliberative Democrat’s Idea of Justice

AU - DRYZEK, John

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice, democracy is necessary for the reconciliation of plural justice claims. Sen’s treatment of democracy is however incomplete and inadequate: democracy is under-specified, there are unrecognized difficulties in any context featuring deep moral disagreement or deep division and a conceptualization of public reason in the singular erodes his pluralism. These faults undermine Sen’s account of justice. Developments in the theory of deliberative democracy can be deployed to remedy these deficiencies. This deployment points to a deliberative system encompassing those affected by collective decisions, with places for non-partisan forums and discursive representatives, conditionally open to multiple forms of communication, and geared to the production of workable agreements under normative and discursive meta-consensus. Democracy does not guarantee justice, but in a plural world it is essential to the pursuit of justice

AB - In Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice, democracy is necessary for the reconciliation of plural justice claims. Sen’s treatment of democracy is however incomplete and inadequate: democracy is under-specified, there are unrecognized difficulties in any context featuring deep moral disagreement or deep division and a conceptualization of public reason in the singular erodes his pluralism. These faults undermine Sen’s account of justice. Developments in the theory of deliberative democracy can be deployed to remedy these deficiencies. This deployment points to a deliberative system encompassing those affected by collective decisions, with places for non-partisan forums and discursive representatives, conditionally open to multiple forms of communication, and geared to the production of workable agreements under normative and discursive meta-consensus. Democracy does not guarantee justice, but in a plural world it is essential to the pursuit of justice

U2 - 10.1177/1474885112466784

DO - 10.1177/1474885112466784

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 329

EP - 346

JO - European Journal of Political theory

JF - European Journal of Political theory

SN - 1474-8851

IS - 4

ER -