The Deliberative Democrat’s Idea of Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)


In Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice, democracy is necessary for the reconciliation of plural justice claims. Sen’s treatment of democracy is however incomplete and inadequate: democracy is under-specified, there are unrecognized difficulties in any context featuring deep moral disagreement or deep division and a conceptualization of public reason in the singular erodes his pluralism. These faults undermine Sen’s account of justice. Developments in the theory of deliberative democracy can be deployed to remedy these deficiencies. This deployment points to a deliberative system encompassing those affected by collective decisions, with places for non-partisan forums and discursive representatives, conditionally open to multiple forms of communication, and geared to the production of workable agreements under normative and discursive meta-consensus. Democracy does not guarantee justice, but in a plural world it is essential to the pursuit of justice
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-346
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal of Political theory
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'The Deliberative Democrat’s Idea of Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this