The development of a pseudo-word spelling test informed by Triple Word Form Theory

Tessa DAFFERN, Ajay RAMFUL

    Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    Spelling ability is a critical literacy skill of sustained concern among educators, parents and employers as it can impact ones capacity to effectively read (Martin-Chang, Ouellette, & Madden, 2014) and write (Daffern, Mackenzie, & Hemmings, 2017a). According to Triple Word Form Theory (TWFT), being able to spell in the English language is also a complex linguistic process involving integration of phonology, orthography and morphology (Daffern, 2015). Phonological processing requires awareness of spoken sounds, at the smallest speech sound (phoneme) level and at the syllable level, and is activated when encoding (spelling) words. Orthographic processing requires sensitivity to letter strings or patterns within words, including knowing plausible alternative grapheme (alphabetic letter) combinations that apply under certain conditions. Morphological processing requires sensitivity to the smallest meaningful units in words, including knowing how suffixes and prefixes attach to base words (Apel, 2014). Breakdowns in any of these linguistic processes can lead to spelling errors (Bahr, 2015).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages1-13
    Number of pages13
    Publication statusPublished - 2018
    EventEuropean Educational Research Association Conference (ECER 2018): Inclusion and Exclusion, Resources for Educational Research? - Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
    Duration: 3 Sept 20187 Sept 2018
    http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer-2018-bolzano/

    Conference

    ConferenceEuropean Educational Research Association Conference (ECER 2018)
    Abbreviated titleECER 2018
    Country/TerritoryItaly
    CityBolzano
    Period3/09/187/09/18
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The development of a pseudo-word spelling test informed by Triple Word Form Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this