The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree?

Danielle Harris, Tom Lowrie

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

Abstract

Mathematics in Australia specifies spatial reasoning as a general capability within the curriculum. However, psychological research to date limits spatial assessment to psychometric tests leaving little room for a well-defined spatial curriculum. Although there are clear relationships between mathematics and spatial thinking, the independence in the measurement of the two constructs in research literature is rarely explored. In the present study, professionals in the fields of STEM Education and Cognitive Psychology evaluated mathematics and spatial assessment items. The results show evidence for a distinction between the two constructs in the content of the items, however with a caveat that thoughtful selection of assessment items is crucial to ensure independence in the measures.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMaking Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
EditorsJodie Hunter, Lisa Darragh, Pam Perger
Place of PublicationAdelaide
PublisherMathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc.
Pages 376-383
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9781920846282
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventMaking Waves, Opening spaces: 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia - Massey University , Albany, New Zealand
Duration: 1 Jul 20185 Jul 2018
https://www.merga.net.au

Conference

ConferenceMaking Waves, Opening spaces: 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
Abbreviated titleMERGA 41
CountryNew Zealand
CityAlbany
Period1/07/185/07/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

psychologist
mathematics
educator
curriculum
psychometrics
psychology
evidence
education
literature

Cite this

Harris, D., & Lowrie, T. (2018). The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree? In J. Hunter, L. Darragh, & P. Perger (Eds.), Making Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 376-383). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc..
Harris, Danielle ; Lowrie, Tom. / The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree?. Making Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia . editor / Jodie Hunter ; Lisa Darragh ; Pam Perger. Adelaide : Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc., 2018. pp. 376-383
@inproceedings{8d08b691733d4f8b8f2537adbb02ab66,
title = "The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree?",
abstract = "Mathematics in Australia specifies spatial reasoning as a general capability within the curriculum. However, psychological research to date limits spatial assessment to psychometric tests leaving little room for a well-defined spatial curriculum. Although there are clear relationships between mathematics and spatial thinking, the independence in the measurement of the two constructs in research literature is rarely explored. In the present study, professionals in the fields of STEM Education and Cognitive Psychology evaluated mathematics and spatial assessment items. The results show evidence for a distinction between the two constructs in the content of the items, however with a caveat that thoughtful selection of assessment items is crucial to ensure independence in the measures.",
keywords = "spatial reasoning, mathematics, assessment",
author = "Danielle Harris and Tom Lowrie",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
pages = "376--383",
editor = "Jodie Hunter and Lisa Darragh and Pam Perger",
booktitle = "Making Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia",
publisher = "Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc.",

}

Harris, D & Lowrie, T 2018, The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree? in J Hunter, L Darragh & P Perger (eds), Making Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia . Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc., Adelaide, pp. 376-383, Making Waves, Opening spaces: 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Albany, New Zealand, 1/07/18.

The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree? / Harris, Danielle; Lowrie, Tom.

Making Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia . ed. / Jodie Hunter; Lisa Darragh; Pam Perger. Adelaide : Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc., 2018. p. 376-383.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree?

AU - Harris, Danielle

AU - Lowrie, Tom

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Mathematics in Australia specifies spatial reasoning as a general capability within the curriculum. However, psychological research to date limits spatial assessment to psychometric tests leaving little room for a well-defined spatial curriculum. Although there are clear relationships between mathematics and spatial thinking, the independence in the measurement of the two constructs in research literature is rarely explored. In the present study, professionals in the fields of STEM Education and Cognitive Psychology evaluated mathematics and spatial assessment items. The results show evidence for a distinction between the two constructs in the content of the items, however with a caveat that thoughtful selection of assessment items is crucial to ensure independence in the measures.

AB - Mathematics in Australia specifies spatial reasoning as a general capability within the curriculum. However, psychological research to date limits spatial assessment to psychometric tests leaving little room for a well-defined spatial curriculum. Although there are clear relationships between mathematics and spatial thinking, the independence in the measurement of the two constructs in research literature is rarely explored. In the present study, professionals in the fields of STEM Education and Cognitive Psychology evaluated mathematics and spatial assessment items. The results show evidence for a distinction between the two constructs in the content of the items, however with a caveat that thoughtful selection of assessment items is crucial to ensure independence in the measures.

KW - spatial reasoning

KW - mathematics

KW - assessment

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 376

EP - 383

BT - Making Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia

A2 - Hunter, Jodie

A2 - Darragh, Lisa

A2 - Perger, Pam

PB - Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc.

CY - Adelaide

ER -

Harris D, Lowrie T. The Distinction Between Mathematics and Spatial Reasoning in Assessment: Do STEM Educators and Cognitive Psychologists Agree? In Hunter J, Darragh L, Perger P, editors, Making Waves, Opening Spaces Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia . Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc. 2018. p. 376-383