The downside of being up: A new look at relative group privilege and traditional prejudice

Josée LeBlanc, Ann Beaton, Iain WALKER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two experiments, we examine the moderating effect of the legitimacy and the stability of the advantaged in-group status on the relationship between measures of group relative gratification (GRG) and traditional prejudice among members of a structurally advantaged group. In Study 1, 133 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was based on legitimate or illegitimate grounds. As expected, when participants learned of the legitimate status of their in-group, GRG was associated with the endorsement of traditional prejudice. In Study 2, 188 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was expected to remain stable or to fluctuate. As predicted, when participants were alerted to the decline in the privileged status of the in-group, GRG was positively associated with traditional prejudice. These findings illuminate the ways in which members of advantaged groups perpetuate intergroup inequities and point to a fuller, more nuanced conceptualization of system stability
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-167
Number of pages25
JournalSocial Justice Research
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

prejudice
privilege
status group
Group
system stability
legitimacy
experiment

Cite this

@article{7eb67e383c1e4dd09dae22afdbce7bd2,
title = "The downside of being up: A new look at relative group privilege and traditional prejudice",
abstract = "In two experiments, we examine the moderating effect of the legitimacy and the stability of the advantaged in-group status on the relationship between measures of group relative gratification (GRG) and traditional prejudice among members of a structurally advantaged group. In Study 1, 133 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was based on legitimate or illegitimate grounds. As expected, when participants learned of the legitimate status of their in-group, GRG was associated with the endorsement of traditional prejudice. In Study 2, 188 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was expected to remain stable or to fluctuate. As predicted, when participants were alerted to the decline in the privileged status of the in-group, GRG was positively associated with traditional prejudice. These findings illuminate the ways in which members of advantaged groups perpetuate intergroup inequities and point to a fuller, more nuanced conceptualization of system stability",
author = "Jos{\'e}e LeBlanc and Ann Beaton and Iain WALKER",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11211-015-0233-y",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "143--167",
journal = "Social Justice Research",
issn = "0885-7466",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

The downside of being up: A new look at relative group privilege and traditional prejudice. / LeBlanc, Josée; Beaton, Ann; WALKER, Iain.

In: Social Justice Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2015, p. 143-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The downside of being up: A new look at relative group privilege and traditional prejudice

AU - LeBlanc, Josée

AU - Beaton, Ann

AU - WALKER, Iain

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In two experiments, we examine the moderating effect of the legitimacy and the stability of the advantaged in-group status on the relationship between measures of group relative gratification (GRG) and traditional prejudice among members of a structurally advantaged group. In Study 1, 133 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was based on legitimate or illegitimate grounds. As expected, when participants learned of the legitimate status of their in-group, GRG was associated with the endorsement of traditional prejudice. In Study 2, 188 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was expected to remain stable or to fluctuate. As predicted, when participants were alerted to the decline in the privileged status of the in-group, GRG was positively associated with traditional prejudice. These findings illuminate the ways in which members of advantaged groups perpetuate intergroup inequities and point to a fuller, more nuanced conceptualization of system stability

AB - In two experiments, we examine the moderating effect of the legitimacy and the stability of the advantaged in-group status on the relationship between measures of group relative gratification (GRG) and traditional prejudice among members of a structurally advantaged group. In Study 1, 133 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was based on legitimate or illegitimate grounds. As expected, when participants learned of the legitimate status of their in-group, GRG was associated with the endorsement of traditional prejudice. In Study 2, 188 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was expected to remain stable or to fluctuate. As predicted, when participants were alerted to the decline in the privileged status of the in-group, GRG was positively associated with traditional prejudice. These findings illuminate the ways in which members of advantaged groups perpetuate intergroup inequities and point to a fuller, more nuanced conceptualization of system stability

U2 - 10.1007/s11211-015-0233-y

DO - 10.1007/s11211-015-0233-y

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 143

EP - 167

JO - Social Justice Research

JF - Social Justice Research

SN - 0885-7466

IS - 1

ER -