The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems

A systematic review

Trina Rytwinski, Jessica J. Taylor, Lisa A. Donaldson, J. Robert Britton, David R. Browne, Robert E. Gresswell, Mark Lintermans, Kent A. Prior, Marlow G. Pellatt, Chantal Vis, Steven J. Cooke

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In aquatic systems, biological invasions can result in adverse ecological effects. Management techniques available for non-native fish removal programs (including eradication and population size control) vary widely, but include chemicals, harvest regimes, physical removal, or biological control. For management agencies, deciding on what non-native fish removal program to use has been challenging because there is little reliable information about the relative effectiveness of these measures in controlling or eradicating non-native fish. We conducted a systematic review, including a critical appraisal of study validity, to assess the effectiveness of different non-native fish removal methods and to identify the factors that influence the overall success rate of each type of method. We found 95 relevant studies, generating 158 data sets. The evidence base was dominated by poorly documented studies with inadequate experimental designs (76% of removal projects). When the management goal was non-native fish eradication, chemical treatments were relatively successful (antimycin 89%; rotenone 75%) compared with other interventions. Electrofishing and passive removal measure studies indicated successful eradication was possible (58% each) but required intensive effort and multiple treatments over a number of years. Of these studies with sufficient information, electrofishing had the highest success for population size control (56% of data sets). Overall, inadequate data quality and completeness severely limited our ability to make strong conclusions about the relationships between non-native fish abundance and different methods of eradication and population control and the factors influencing the overall success rate of each method. Our review highlights that there is considerable scope for improving our evaluations of non-native fish removal methods. It is recommended that programs should have explicitly stated objectives, better data reporting, and study designs that (when possible and appropriate) incorporate replicated and controlled investigations with rigorous, long-term quantitative monitoring. Future research on the effectiveness of non-native fish removal methods should focus on: (i) the efficacy of existing or potentially new removal measures in larger, more complex environments; (ii) a broader range of removal measures in general; and (iii) phenotypic characteristics of individual fish within a population that fail to be eradicated or controlled.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-94
Number of pages24
JournalEnvironmental Reviews
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

freshwater ecosystem
fish
electrofishing
population size
removal
biological invasion
data quality
biological control
experimental design
method

Cite this

Rytwinski, T., Taylor, J. J., Donaldson, L. A., Britton, J. R., Browne, D. R., Gresswell, R. E., ... Cooke, S. J. (2019). The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems: A systematic review. Environmental Reviews, 27(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0049
Rytwinski, Trina ; Taylor, Jessica J. ; Donaldson, Lisa A. ; Britton, J. Robert ; Browne, David R. ; Gresswell, Robert E. ; Lintermans, Mark ; Prior, Kent A. ; Pellatt, Marlow G. ; Vis, Chantal ; Cooke, Steven J. / The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems : A systematic review. In: Environmental Reviews. 2019 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 71-94.
@article{55b1925a5e1c42d9a9f55167e44f57c4,
title = "The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems: A systematic review",
abstract = "In aquatic systems, biological invasions can result in adverse ecological effects. Management techniques available for non-native fish removal programs (including eradication and population size control) vary widely, but include chemicals, harvest regimes, physical removal, or biological control. For management agencies, deciding on what non-native fish removal program to use has been challenging because there is little reliable information about the relative effectiveness of these measures in controlling or eradicating non-native fish. We conducted a systematic review, including a critical appraisal of study validity, to assess the effectiveness of different non-native fish removal methods and to identify the factors that influence the overall success rate of each type of method. We found 95 relevant studies, generating 158 data sets. The evidence base was dominated by poorly documented studies with inadequate experimental designs (76{\%} of removal projects). When the management goal was non-native fish eradication, chemical treatments were relatively successful (antimycin 89{\%}; rotenone 75{\%}) compared with other interventions. Electrofishing and passive removal measure studies indicated successful eradication was possible (58{\%} each) but required intensive effort and multiple treatments over a number of years. Of these studies with sufficient information, electrofishing had the highest success for population size control (56{\%} of data sets). Overall, inadequate data quality and completeness severely limited our ability to make strong conclusions about the relationships between non-native fish abundance and different methods of eradication and population control and the factors influencing the overall success rate of each method. Our review highlights that there is considerable scope for improving our evaluations of non-native fish removal methods. It is recommended that programs should have explicitly stated objectives, better data reporting, and study designs that (when possible and appropriate) incorporate replicated and controlled investigations with rigorous, long-term quantitative monitoring. Future research on the effectiveness of non-native fish removal methods should focus on: (i) the efficacy of existing or potentially new removal measures in larger, more complex environments; (ii) a broader range of removal measures in general; and (iii) phenotypic characteristics of individual fish within a population that fail to be eradicated or controlled.",
keywords = "Alien invasive species, Evidence-based policy, Invasion biology, Invasive species, Nonindigenous species, Restoration",
author = "Trina Rytwinski and Taylor, {Jessica J.} and Donaldson, {Lisa A.} and Britton, {J. Robert} and Browne, {David R.} and Gresswell, {Robert E.} and Mark Lintermans and Prior, {Kent A.} and Pellatt, {Marlow G.} and Chantal Vis and Cooke, {Steven J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1139/er-2018-0049",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "71--94",
journal = "Environmental Reviews",
issn = "1181-8700",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "1",

}

Rytwinski, T, Taylor, JJ, Donaldson, LA, Britton, JR, Browne, DR, Gresswell, RE, Lintermans, M, Prior, KA, Pellatt, MG, Vis, C & Cooke, SJ 2019, 'The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems: A systematic review', Environmental Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0049

The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems : A systematic review. / Rytwinski, Trina; Taylor, Jessica J.; Donaldson, Lisa A.; Britton, J. Robert; Browne, David R.; Gresswell, Robert E.; Lintermans, Mark; Prior, Kent A.; Pellatt, Marlow G.; Vis, Chantal; Cooke, Steven J.

In: Environmental Reviews, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 71-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Rytwinski, Trina

AU - Taylor, Jessica J.

AU - Donaldson, Lisa A.

AU - Britton, J. Robert

AU - Browne, David R.

AU - Gresswell, Robert E.

AU - Lintermans, Mark

AU - Prior, Kent A.

AU - Pellatt, Marlow G.

AU - Vis, Chantal

AU - Cooke, Steven J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In aquatic systems, biological invasions can result in adverse ecological effects. Management techniques available for non-native fish removal programs (including eradication and population size control) vary widely, but include chemicals, harvest regimes, physical removal, or biological control. For management agencies, deciding on what non-native fish removal program to use has been challenging because there is little reliable information about the relative effectiveness of these measures in controlling or eradicating non-native fish. We conducted a systematic review, including a critical appraisal of study validity, to assess the effectiveness of different non-native fish removal methods and to identify the factors that influence the overall success rate of each type of method. We found 95 relevant studies, generating 158 data sets. The evidence base was dominated by poorly documented studies with inadequate experimental designs (76% of removal projects). When the management goal was non-native fish eradication, chemical treatments were relatively successful (antimycin 89%; rotenone 75%) compared with other interventions. Electrofishing and passive removal measure studies indicated successful eradication was possible (58% each) but required intensive effort and multiple treatments over a number of years. Of these studies with sufficient information, electrofishing had the highest success for population size control (56% of data sets). Overall, inadequate data quality and completeness severely limited our ability to make strong conclusions about the relationships between non-native fish abundance and different methods of eradication and population control and the factors influencing the overall success rate of each method. Our review highlights that there is considerable scope for improving our evaluations of non-native fish removal methods. It is recommended that programs should have explicitly stated objectives, better data reporting, and study designs that (when possible and appropriate) incorporate replicated and controlled investigations with rigorous, long-term quantitative monitoring. Future research on the effectiveness of non-native fish removal methods should focus on: (i) the efficacy of existing or potentially new removal measures in larger, more complex environments; (ii) a broader range of removal measures in general; and (iii) phenotypic characteristics of individual fish within a population that fail to be eradicated or controlled.

AB - In aquatic systems, biological invasions can result in adverse ecological effects. Management techniques available for non-native fish removal programs (including eradication and population size control) vary widely, but include chemicals, harvest regimes, physical removal, or biological control. For management agencies, deciding on what non-native fish removal program to use has been challenging because there is little reliable information about the relative effectiveness of these measures in controlling or eradicating non-native fish. We conducted a systematic review, including a critical appraisal of study validity, to assess the effectiveness of different non-native fish removal methods and to identify the factors that influence the overall success rate of each type of method. We found 95 relevant studies, generating 158 data sets. The evidence base was dominated by poorly documented studies with inadequate experimental designs (76% of removal projects). When the management goal was non-native fish eradication, chemical treatments were relatively successful (antimycin 89%; rotenone 75%) compared with other interventions. Electrofishing and passive removal measure studies indicated successful eradication was possible (58% each) but required intensive effort and multiple treatments over a number of years. Of these studies with sufficient information, electrofishing had the highest success for population size control (56% of data sets). Overall, inadequate data quality and completeness severely limited our ability to make strong conclusions about the relationships between non-native fish abundance and different methods of eradication and population control and the factors influencing the overall success rate of each method. Our review highlights that there is considerable scope for improving our evaluations of non-native fish removal methods. It is recommended that programs should have explicitly stated objectives, better data reporting, and study designs that (when possible and appropriate) incorporate replicated and controlled investigations with rigorous, long-term quantitative monitoring. Future research on the effectiveness of non-native fish removal methods should focus on: (i) the efficacy of existing or potentially new removal measures in larger, more complex environments; (ii) a broader range of removal measures in general; and (iii) phenotypic characteristics of individual fish within a population that fail to be eradicated or controlled.

KW - Alien invasive species

KW - Evidence-based policy

KW - Invasion biology

KW - Invasive species

KW - Nonindigenous species

KW - Restoration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062807185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/effectiveness-nonnative-fish-removal-techniques-freshwater-ecosystems-systematic-review

U2 - 10.1139/er-2018-0049

DO - 10.1139/er-2018-0049

M3 - Review article

VL - 27

SP - 71

EP - 94

JO - Environmental Reviews

JF - Environmental Reviews

SN - 1181-8700

IS - 1

ER -

Rytwinski T, Taylor JJ, Donaldson LA, Britton JR, Browne DR, Gresswell RE et al. The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems: A systematic review. Environmental Reviews. 2019 Jan 1;27(1):71-94. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0049