The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article investigates the prospects of deliberative democracy through the analysis of small-scale deliberative events, or mini-publics, using empirical methods to understand the process of preference transformation. Evidence from two case studies suggests that deliberation corrects preexisting distortions of public will caused by either active manipulation or passive overemphasis on symbolically potent issues. Deliberation corrected these distortions by reconnecting participants’ expressed preferences to their underlying “will” as well as shaping a shared understanding of the issue.The article concludes by using these insights to suggest ways that mini-public deliberation might be articulated to the broader public sphere so that the benefits might be scaled up. That mini-public deliberation does not so much change individual subjectivity as reconnect it to the expression of will suggests that scaling up the transformative effects should be possible so long as this involves communicating in the form of reasons rather than preferred outcome alone
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-140
Number of pages38
JournalPolitics Society
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

deliberation
empirical method
deliberative democracy
scaling
subjectivity
manipulation
event
evidence

Cite this

@article{508406b6404242d4af1623dc34aace27,
title = "The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics",
abstract = "This article investigates the prospects of deliberative democracy through the analysis of small-scale deliberative events, or mini-publics, using empirical methods to understand the process of preference transformation. Evidence from two case studies suggests that deliberation corrects preexisting distortions of public will caused by either active manipulation or passive overemphasis on symbolically potent issues. Deliberation corrected these distortions by reconnecting participants’ expressed preferences to their underlying “will” as well as shaping a shared understanding of the issue.The article concludes by using these insights to suggest ways that mini-public deliberation might be articulated to the broader public sphere so that the benefits might be scaled up. That mini-public deliberation does not so much change individual subjectivity as reconnect it to the expression of will suggests that scaling up the transformative effects should be possible so long as this involves communicating in the form of reasons rather than preferred outcome alone",
author = "Simon Niemeyer",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1177/0032329210395000",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "103--140",
journal = "Politics Society",
issn = "0032-3292",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics. / Niemeyer, Simon.

In: Politics Society, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2011, p. 103-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article investigates the prospects of deliberative democracy through the analysis of small-scale deliberative events, or mini-publics, using empirical methods to understand the process of preference transformation. Evidence from two case studies suggests that deliberation corrects preexisting distortions of public will caused by either active manipulation or passive overemphasis on symbolically potent issues. Deliberation corrected these distortions by reconnecting participants’ expressed preferences to their underlying “will” as well as shaping a shared understanding of the issue.The article concludes by using these insights to suggest ways that mini-public deliberation might be articulated to the broader public sphere so that the benefits might be scaled up. That mini-public deliberation does not so much change individual subjectivity as reconnect it to the expression of will suggests that scaling up the transformative effects should be possible so long as this involves communicating in the form of reasons rather than preferred outcome alone

AB - This article investigates the prospects of deliberative democracy through the analysis of small-scale deliberative events, or mini-publics, using empirical methods to understand the process of preference transformation. Evidence from two case studies suggests that deliberation corrects preexisting distortions of public will caused by either active manipulation or passive overemphasis on symbolically potent issues. Deliberation corrected these distortions by reconnecting participants’ expressed preferences to their underlying “will” as well as shaping a shared understanding of the issue.The article concludes by using these insights to suggest ways that mini-public deliberation might be articulated to the broader public sphere so that the benefits might be scaled up. That mini-public deliberation does not so much change individual subjectivity as reconnect it to the expression of will suggests that scaling up the transformative effects should be possible so long as this involves communicating in the form of reasons rather than preferred outcome alone

U2 - 10.1177/0032329210395000

DO - 10.1177/0032329210395000

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 103

EP - 140

JO - Politics Society

JF - Politics Society

SN - 0032-3292

IS - 1

ER -