The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

Abstract

The Abbott Government’s response to the problem of climate change is the ‘direct action’ proposal, a fig leaf to cover the gap left by their planned abolition of the carbon price. Its main component is an emissions reduction fund which will be used to pay firms tendering to reduce their CO2 emissions below ‘business as usual’ levels. No credible experts believe the $1.1 billion over four years allocated in the budget will suffice to reduce emissions to anywhere near the promised 5 per cent (from 2000 levels) by 2020, let alone the much larger reductions which would represent Australia’s fair contribution to limiting global warming. Even were it better funded, the current sketchy version of the scheme, changed quite a deal from that taken to two elections, is still flawed in many ways. It fails to limit emissions. By only offering five-year contracts it will not affect long-term investment decisions. Taxes are higher so as to pay polluters. Past bad behaviour is rewarded and administrative expenses will be very high. Unsurprisingly, the overwhelming majority of economists oppose it.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOpportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries
Place of PublicationCanberra
PublisherAustralia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics
Pages243-258
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event Australia New Zealand
Society for Ecological Economics 2013 Conference
-
Duration: 31 May 2013 → …

Conference

Conference Australia New Zealand
Society for Ecological Economics 2013 Conference
Period31/05/13 → …

Fingerprint

election
global warming
climate change
carbon
emission reduction
decision
price
contract
budget
tax
firm

Cite this

HAWKINS, J. (2014). The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique. In Opportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries (pp. 243-258). Canberra: Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics.
HAWKINS, John. / The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique. Opportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries. Canberra : Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics, 2014. pp. 243-258
@inproceedings{98f52dd20316481493bbf6f597390865,
title = "The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique",
abstract = "The Abbott Government’s response to the problem of climate change is the ‘direct action’ proposal, a fig leaf to cover the gap left by their planned abolition of the carbon price. Its main component is an emissions reduction fund which will be used to pay firms tendering to reduce their CO2 emissions below ‘business as usual’ levels. No credible experts believe the $1.1 billion over four years allocated in the budget will suffice to reduce emissions to anywhere near the promised 5 per cent (from 2000 levels) by 2020, let alone the much larger reductions which would represent Australia’s fair contribution to limiting global warming. Even were it better funded, the current sketchy version of the scheme, changed quite a deal from that taken to two elections, is still flawed in many ways. It fails to limit emissions. By only offering five-year contracts it will not affect long-term investment decisions. Taxes are higher so as to pay polluters. Past bad behaviour is rewarded and administrative expenses will be very high. Unsurprisingly, the overwhelming majority of economists oppose it.",
keywords = "emissions reduction, direct action, climate change",
author = "John HAWKINS",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
pages = "243--258",
booktitle = "Opportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries",
publisher = "Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics",

}

HAWKINS, J 2014, The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique. in Opportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries. Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics, Canberra, pp. 243-258, Australia New Zealand
Society for Ecological Economics 2013 Conference, 31/05/13.

The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique. / HAWKINS, John.

Opportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries. Canberra : Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics, 2014. p. 243-258.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique

AU - HAWKINS, John

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The Abbott Government’s response to the problem of climate change is the ‘direct action’ proposal, a fig leaf to cover the gap left by their planned abolition of the carbon price. Its main component is an emissions reduction fund which will be used to pay firms tendering to reduce their CO2 emissions below ‘business as usual’ levels. No credible experts believe the $1.1 billion over four years allocated in the budget will suffice to reduce emissions to anywhere near the promised 5 per cent (from 2000 levels) by 2020, let alone the much larger reductions which would represent Australia’s fair contribution to limiting global warming. Even were it better funded, the current sketchy version of the scheme, changed quite a deal from that taken to two elections, is still flawed in many ways. It fails to limit emissions. By only offering five-year contracts it will not affect long-term investment decisions. Taxes are higher so as to pay polluters. Past bad behaviour is rewarded and administrative expenses will be very high. Unsurprisingly, the overwhelming majority of economists oppose it.

AB - The Abbott Government’s response to the problem of climate change is the ‘direct action’ proposal, a fig leaf to cover the gap left by their planned abolition of the carbon price. Its main component is an emissions reduction fund which will be used to pay firms tendering to reduce their CO2 emissions below ‘business as usual’ levels. No credible experts believe the $1.1 billion over four years allocated in the budget will suffice to reduce emissions to anywhere near the promised 5 per cent (from 2000 levels) by 2020, let alone the much larger reductions which would represent Australia’s fair contribution to limiting global warming. Even were it better funded, the current sketchy version of the scheme, changed quite a deal from that taken to two elections, is still flawed in many ways. It fails to limit emissions. By only offering five-year contracts it will not affect long-term investment decisions. Taxes are higher so as to pay polluters. Past bad behaviour is rewarded and administrative expenses will be very high. Unsurprisingly, the overwhelming majority of economists oppose it.

KW - emissions reduction

KW - direct action

KW - climate change

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 243

EP - 258

BT - Opportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries

PB - Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics

CY - Canberra

ER -

HAWKINS J. The Emissions Reduction Fund: a critique. In Opportunities for the Critical Decade: Enhancing well-being within planetary boundaries. Canberra: Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics. 2014. p. 243-258