The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence

Claude Roux, Benjamin Talbot-Wright, James ROBERTSON, Frank Crispino, Olivier Ribaux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The dominant conception of forensic science as a patchwork of disciplines primarily assisting the criminal justice system (i.e. forensics) is in crisis or at least shows a series of anomalies and serious limitations. In recent years, symptoms of the crisis have been discussed in a number of reports by various commentators, without a doubt epitomized by the 2009 report by the US National Academies of Sciences (NAS 2009 Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward). Although needed, but viewed as the solution to these drawbacks, the almost generalized adoption of stricter business models in forensic science casework compounded with ever- increasing normative and compliance processes not only place additional pressures on a discipline that already appears in difficulty, but also induce more fragmentation of the different forensic science tasks, a tenet many times denounced by the same NAS report and other similar reviews. One may ask whether these issues are not simply the result of an unfit paradigm. If this is the case, the current problems faced by forensic science may indicate future significant changes for the discipline. To facilitate broader discussion this presentation focuses on trace evidence, an area that is seminal to forensic science both for epistemological and historical reasons. There is, however, little doubt that this area is currently under siege worldwide. Current and future challenges faced by trace evidence are discussed along with some possible answers. The current situation ultimately presents some significant opportunities to re-invent not only trace evidence but also forensic science. Ultimately, a distinctive, more robust and more reliable science may emerge through rethinking the forensics paradigm built on specialisms, revisiting fundamental forensic science principles and adapting them to the twenty-first century.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume370
Issue number1674
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

Forensic Sciences
Criminal Law
forensic sciences
Forensic science
Compliance
compliance
signs and symptoms (animals and humans)
Pressure

Cite this

Roux, Claude ; Talbot-Wright, Benjamin ; ROBERTSON, James ; Crispino, Frank ; Ribaux, Olivier. / The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015 ; Vol. 370, No. 1674. pp. 1-8.
@article{0747e2ad0b28482ab62a4107e353342a,
title = "The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence",
abstract = "The dominant conception of forensic science as a patchwork of disciplines primarily assisting the criminal justice system (i.e. forensics) is in crisis or at least shows a series of anomalies and serious limitations. In recent years, symptoms of the crisis have been discussed in a number of reports by various commentators, without a doubt epitomized by the 2009 report by the US National Academies of Sciences (NAS 2009 Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward). Although needed, but viewed as the solution to these drawbacks, the almost generalized adoption of stricter business models in forensic science casework compounded with ever- increasing normative and compliance processes not only place additional pressures on a discipline that already appears in difficulty, but also induce more fragmentation of the different forensic science tasks, a tenet many times denounced by the same NAS report and other similar reviews. One may ask whether these issues are not simply the result of an unfit paradigm. If this is the case, the current problems faced by forensic science may indicate future significant changes for the discipline. To facilitate broader discussion this presentation focuses on trace evidence, an area that is seminal to forensic science both for epistemological and historical reasons. There is, however, little doubt that this area is currently under siege worldwide. Current and future challenges faced by trace evidence are discussed along with some possible answers. The current situation ultimately presents some significant opportunities to re-invent not only trace evidence but also forensic science. Ultimately, a distinctive, more robust and more reliable science may emerge through rethinking the forensics paradigm built on specialisms, revisiting fundamental forensic science principles and adapting them to the twenty-first century.",
keywords = "Crime scene, Forensic science, Intelligence, Organizations, Policing, Trace evidence",
author = "Claude Roux and Benjamin Talbot-Wright and James ROBERTSON and Frank Crispino and Olivier Ribaux",
note = "{\circledC} 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1098/rstb.2014.0260",
language = "English",
volume = "370",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1674",

}

The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence. / Roux, Claude; Talbot-Wright, Benjamin; ROBERTSON, James; Crispino, Frank; Ribaux, Olivier.

In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 370, No. 1674, 05.08.2015, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence

AU - Roux, Claude

AU - Talbot-Wright, Benjamin

AU - ROBERTSON, James

AU - Crispino, Frank

AU - Ribaux, Olivier

N1 - © 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/8/5

Y1 - 2015/8/5

N2 - The dominant conception of forensic science as a patchwork of disciplines primarily assisting the criminal justice system (i.e. forensics) is in crisis or at least shows a series of anomalies and serious limitations. In recent years, symptoms of the crisis have been discussed in a number of reports by various commentators, without a doubt epitomized by the 2009 report by the US National Academies of Sciences (NAS 2009 Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward). Although needed, but viewed as the solution to these drawbacks, the almost generalized adoption of stricter business models in forensic science casework compounded with ever- increasing normative and compliance processes not only place additional pressures on a discipline that already appears in difficulty, but also induce more fragmentation of the different forensic science tasks, a tenet many times denounced by the same NAS report and other similar reviews. One may ask whether these issues are not simply the result of an unfit paradigm. If this is the case, the current problems faced by forensic science may indicate future significant changes for the discipline. To facilitate broader discussion this presentation focuses on trace evidence, an area that is seminal to forensic science both for epistemological and historical reasons. There is, however, little doubt that this area is currently under siege worldwide. Current and future challenges faced by trace evidence are discussed along with some possible answers. The current situation ultimately presents some significant opportunities to re-invent not only trace evidence but also forensic science. Ultimately, a distinctive, more robust and more reliable science may emerge through rethinking the forensics paradigm built on specialisms, revisiting fundamental forensic science principles and adapting them to the twenty-first century.

AB - The dominant conception of forensic science as a patchwork of disciplines primarily assisting the criminal justice system (i.e. forensics) is in crisis or at least shows a series of anomalies and serious limitations. In recent years, symptoms of the crisis have been discussed in a number of reports by various commentators, without a doubt epitomized by the 2009 report by the US National Academies of Sciences (NAS 2009 Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward). Although needed, but viewed as the solution to these drawbacks, the almost generalized adoption of stricter business models in forensic science casework compounded with ever- increasing normative and compliance processes not only place additional pressures on a discipline that already appears in difficulty, but also induce more fragmentation of the different forensic science tasks, a tenet many times denounced by the same NAS report and other similar reviews. One may ask whether these issues are not simply the result of an unfit paradigm. If this is the case, the current problems faced by forensic science may indicate future significant changes for the discipline. To facilitate broader discussion this presentation focuses on trace evidence, an area that is seminal to forensic science both for epistemological and historical reasons. There is, however, little doubt that this area is currently under siege worldwide. Current and future challenges faced by trace evidence are discussed along with some possible answers. The current situation ultimately presents some significant opportunities to re-invent not only trace evidence but also forensic science. Ultimately, a distinctive, more robust and more reliable science may emerge through rethinking the forensics paradigm built on specialisms, revisiting fundamental forensic science principles and adapting them to the twenty-first century.

KW - Crime scene

KW - Forensic science

KW - Intelligence

KW - Organizations

KW - Policing

KW - Trace evidence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932162857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2014.0260

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2014.0260

M3 - Article

VL - 370

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1674

ER -