TY - JOUR
T1 - The ends of deliberation
T2 - Meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes
AU - Niemeyer, Simon
AU - Dryzek, John S.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.
AB - Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.
KW - Consensus
KW - Deliberative democracy
KW - Deliberative outcomes
KW - Inter-subjective rationality
KW - Meta-consensus
KW - Subjectivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149016158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00087.x
DO - 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00087.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:38149016158
SN - 1424-7755
VL - 13
SP - 497
EP - 526
JO - Swiss Political Science Review
JF - Swiss Political Science Review
IS - 4
ER -