The ends of deliberation

Meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-526
Number of pages30
JournalSwiss Political Science Review
Volume13
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

deliberation
rationality
uncertainty
Values

Cite this

@article{5108e318dfc0434fbe6feb49f2e64320,
title = "The ends of deliberation: Meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes",
abstract = "Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.",
keywords = "Consensus, Deliberative democracy, Deliberative outcomes, Inter-subjective rationality, Meta-consensus, Subjectivity",
author = "Simon Niemeyer and Dryzek, {John S.}",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "497--526",
journal = "Swiss Political Science Review",
issn = "1424-7755",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ends of deliberation

T2 - Meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

AU - Dryzek, John S.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.

AB - Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.

KW - Consensus

KW - Deliberative democracy

KW - Deliberative outcomes

KW - Inter-subjective rationality

KW - Meta-consensus

KW - Subjectivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149016158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 497

EP - 526

JO - Swiss Political Science Review

JF - Swiss Political Science Review

SN - 1424-7755

IS - 4

ER -