The evidence-based practice profiles of academic and clinical staff involved in pre-registration nursing students' education: A cross sectional survey of US and UK staff

Penney Upton, Laura Scurlock-Evans, Kathleen Williamson, Joanne Rouse, Dominic UPTON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Competency in evidence-based practice (EBP) is a requirement for graduate nurses. Despite a growing body of research exploring the EBP profiles of students, little research has explored the EBP profiles of nurse educators. Objectives: To explore: the differences/similarities in the EBP profiles of US and UK clinical and academic faculty; the barriers nurse educators experience when teaching EBP; the impact of postgraduate education on EBP profile and; what nurse educators perceive"success"in implementing and teaching EBP to be. Design: A cross-sectional online survey design was employed. Settings: Two Universities delivering undergraduate nursing education in the US and UK, in partnership with large hospital systems, small community hospitals, community settings, and independent sector healthorganisations. Participants: Eighty-one nurse educators working in academic and clinical contexts in the US and UK (US academic. =. 12, US clinical. =. 17, UK academic. =. 9, UK clinical. =. 43) were recruited opportunistically. Methods: Participants were emailed a weblink to an online survey, comprising demographic questions, the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire and open-ended questions about EBP barriers, facilitators and successes. Results: Quantitative results indicatedthatacademic faculty scored significantly higher on knowledge and skills of EBP, than clinical faculty, but revealed no other significant differences on EBP use or attitudes, or between US and UK professionals. Participants with postgraduate training scored significantly higher on EBP knowledge/skills, but not EBP attitudes or use. Qualitative findings identified key themes relating to EBP barriers and facilitators, including: Evidence-, organisational-, and teaching-related issues. Perceptions of successes in EBP were also described. Conclusions: Nurse educators working in the UK and US face similar EBP barriers to teaching and implementation, but view it positively and use it frequently. Clinical staff may require extra support to maintain their EBP knowledge and skills in comparison to staff working in academic contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-85
Number of pages6
JournalNurse Education Today
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Nursing Students
Nursing Education
Evidence-Based Practice
nursing
Cross-Sectional Studies
staff
evidence
education
student
nurse
Nurses
educator
Teaching
online survey
hospital system
Community Hospital
Research

Cite this

@article{97a5be584d344c26b2007d0702cb7cdf,
title = "The evidence-based practice profiles of academic and clinical staff involved in pre-registration nursing students' education: A cross sectional survey of US and UK staff",
abstract = "Background: Competency in evidence-based practice (EBP) is a requirement for graduate nurses. Despite a growing body of research exploring the EBP profiles of students, little research has explored the EBP profiles of nurse educators. Objectives: To explore: the differences/similarities in the EBP profiles of US and UK clinical and academic faculty; the barriers nurse educators experience when teaching EBP; the impact of postgraduate education on EBP profile and; what nurse educators perceive{"}success{"}in implementing and teaching EBP to be. Design: A cross-sectional online survey design was employed. Settings: Two Universities delivering undergraduate nursing education in the US and UK, in partnership with large hospital systems, small community hospitals, community settings, and independent sector healthorganisations. Participants: Eighty-one nurse educators working in academic and clinical contexts in the US and UK (US academic. =. 12, US clinical. =. 17, UK academic. =. 9, UK clinical. =. 43) were recruited opportunistically. Methods: Participants were emailed a weblink to an online survey, comprising demographic questions, the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire and open-ended questions about EBP barriers, facilitators and successes. Results: Quantitative results indicatedthatacademic faculty scored significantly higher on knowledge and skills of EBP, than clinical faculty, but revealed no other significant differences on EBP use or attitudes, or between US and UK professionals. Participants with postgraduate training scored significantly higher on EBP knowledge/skills, but not EBP attitudes or use. Qualitative findings identified key themes relating to EBP barriers and facilitators, including: Evidence-, organisational-, and teaching-related issues. Perceptions of successes in EBP were also described. Conclusions: Nurse educators working in the UK and US face similar EBP barriers to teaching and implementation, but view it positively and use it frequently. Clinical staff may require extra support to maintain their EBP knowledge and skills in comparison to staff working in academic contexts.",
author = "Penney Upton and Laura Scurlock-Evans and Kathleen Williamson and Joanne Rouse and Dominic UPTON",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "80--85",
journal = "Nurse Education Today",
issn = "0260-6917",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

The evidence-based practice profiles of academic and clinical staff involved in pre-registration nursing students' education: A cross sectional survey of US and UK staff. / Upton, Penney; Scurlock-Evans, Laura; Williamson, Kathleen; Rouse, Joanne; UPTON, Dominic.

In: Nurse Education Today, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2015, p. 80-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evidence-based practice profiles of academic and clinical staff involved in pre-registration nursing students' education: A cross sectional survey of US and UK staff

AU - Upton, Penney

AU - Scurlock-Evans, Laura

AU - Williamson, Kathleen

AU - Rouse, Joanne

AU - UPTON, Dominic

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Competency in evidence-based practice (EBP) is a requirement for graduate nurses. Despite a growing body of research exploring the EBP profiles of students, little research has explored the EBP profiles of nurse educators. Objectives: To explore: the differences/similarities in the EBP profiles of US and UK clinical and academic faculty; the barriers nurse educators experience when teaching EBP; the impact of postgraduate education on EBP profile and; what nurse educators perceive"success"in implementing and teaching EBP to be. Design: A cross-sectional online survey design was employed. Settings: Two Universities delivering undergraduate nursing education in the US and UK, in partnership with large hospital systems, small community hospitals, community settings, and independent sector healthorganisations. Participants: Eighty-one nurse educators working in academic and clinical contexts in the US and UK (US academic. =. 12, US clinical. =. 17, UK academic. =. 9, UK clinical. =. 43) were recruited opportunistically. Methods: Participants were emailed a weblink to an online survey, comprising demographic questions, the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire and open-ended questions about EBP barriers, facilitators and successes. Results: Quantitative results indicatedthatacademic faculty scored significantly higher on knowledge and skills of EBP, than clinical faculty, but revealed no other significant differences on EBP use or attitudes, or between US and UK professionals. Participants with postgraduate training scored significantly higher on EBP knowledge/skills, but not EBP attitudes or use. Qualitative findings identified key themes relating to EBP barriers and facilitators, including: Evidence-, organisational-, and teaching-related issues. Perceptions of successes in EBP were also described. Conclusions: Nurse educators working in the UK and US face similar EBP barriers to teaching and implementation, but view it positively and use it frequently. Clinical staff may require extra support to maintain their EBP knowledge and skills in comparison to staff working in academic contexts.

AB - Background: Competency in evidence-based practice (EBP) is a requirement for graduate nurses. Despite a growing body of research exploring the EBP profiles of students, little research has explored the EBP profiles of nurse educators. Objectives: To explore: the differences/similarities in the EBP profiles of US and UK clinical and academic faculty; the barriers nurse educators experience when teaching EBP; the impact of postgraduate education on EBP profile and; what nurse educators perceive"success"in implementing and teaching EBP to be. Design: A cross-sectional online survey design was employed. Settings: Two Universities delivering undergraduate nursing education in the US and UK, in partnership with large hospital systems, small community hospitals, community settings, and independent sector healthorganisations. Participants: Eighty-one nurse educators working in academic and clinical contexts in the US and UK (US academic. =. 12, US clinical. =. 17, UK academic. =. 9, UK clinical. =. 43) were recruited opportunistically. Methods: Participants were emailed a weblink to an online survey, comprising demographic questions, the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire and open-ended questions about EBP barriers, facilitators and successes. Results: Quantitative results indicatedthatacademic faculty scored significantly higher on knowledge and skills of EBP, than clinical faculty, but revealed no other significant differences on EBP use or attitudes, or between US and UK professionals. Participants with postgraduate training scored significantly higher on EBP knowledge/skills, but not EBP attitudes or use. Qualitative findings identified key themes relating to EBP barriers and facilitators, including: Evidence-, organisational-, and teaching-related issues. Perceptions of successes in EBP were also described. Conclusions: Nurse educators working in the UK and US face similar EBP barriers to teaching and implementation, but view it positively and use it frequently. Clinical staff may require extra support to maintain their EBP knowledge and skills in comparison to staff working in academic contexts.

U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.006

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 80

EP - 85

JO - Nurse Education Today

JF - Nurse Education Today

SN - 0260-6917

IS - 1

ER -