The Evolution of Rural Policy: the Antipodean experience

Geoff Cockfield, Linda Botterill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In common with other countries in the developed world, Australia and New Zealand developed an array of institutions and programs from the 1950s to the 1970s to support their agricultural sectors. From the mid-1980s they dismantled these, very rapidly in the case of New Zealand, to leave farmers and rural regions largely to market forces. This article explores the transition in Australia and New Zealand from agricultural policy based on 'protected development' to broader rural policy which includes consideration of regional development and environmentalism. We argue that the ideas and values of market liberalism are more apparent in rural policy in Australia and New Zealand than in the EU and US and we propose reasons for that, including differences in economic context, cultural ideas and political institutions
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-353
Number of pages11
JournalPolicy and Society
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

New Zealand
experience
agricultural sector
agricultural policy
market
political institution
liberalism
regional development
rural area
farmer
EU
economics
Values

Cite this

Cockfield, Geoff ; Botterill, Linda. / The Evolution of Rural Policy: the Antipodean experience. In: Policy and Society. 2012 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 343-353.
@article{59c0f5d0c34b4595807587ade044c112,
title = "The Evolution of Rural Policy: the Antipodean experience",
abstract = "In common with other countries in the developed world, Australia and New Zealand developed an array of institutions and programs from the 1950s to the 1970s to support their agricultural sectors. From the mid-1980s they dismantled these, very rapidly in the case of New Zealand, to leave farmers and rural regions largely to market forces. This article explores the transition in Australia and New Zealand from agricultural policy based on 'protected development' to broader rural policy which includes consideration of regional development and environmentalism. We argue that the ideas and values of market liberalism are more apparent in rural policy in Australia and New Zealand than in the EU and US and we propose reasons for that, including differences in economic context, cultural ideas and political institutions",
keywords = "Rural Policy",
author = "Geoff Cockfield and Linda Botterill",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.006",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "343--353",
journal = "Policy and Society",
issn = "1449-4035",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

The Evolution of Rural Policy: the Antipodean experience. / Cockfield, Geoff; Botterill, Linda.

In: Policy and Society, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2012, p. 343-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Evolution of Rural Policy: the Antipodean experience

AU - Cockfield, Geoff

AU - Botterill, Linda

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In common with other countries in the developed world, Australia and New Zealand developed an array of institutions and programs from the 1950s to the 1970s to support their agricultural sectors. From the mid-1980s they dismantled these, very rapidly in the case of New Zealand, to leave farmers and rural regions largely to market forces. This article explores the transition in Australia and New Zealand from agricultural policy based on 'protected development' to broader rural policy which includes consideration of regional development and environmentalism. We argue that the ideas and values of market liberalism are more apparent in rural policy in Australia and New Zealand than in the EU and US and we propose reasons for that, including differences in economic context, cultural ideas and political institutions

AB - In common with other countries in the developed world, Australia and New Zealand developed an array of institutions and programs from the 1950s to the 1970s to support their agricultural sectors. From the mid-1980s they dismantled these, very rapidly in the case of New Zealand, to leave farmers and rural regions largely to market forces. This article explores the transition in Australia and New Zealand from agricultural policy based on 'protected development' to broader rural policy which includes consideration of regional development and environmentalism. We argue that the ideas and values of market liberalism are more apparent in rural policy in Australia and New Zealand than in the EU and US and we propose reasons for that, including differences in economic context, cultural ideas and political institutions

KW - Rural Policy

U2 - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.006

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 343

EP - 353

JO - Policy and Society

JF - Policy and Society

SN - 1449-4035

IS - 4

ER -