Abstract
The theory of deliberative democracy is here furthered in terms of three
images that locate its essence in respectively a single forum, a deliberative
system, and an encompassing polity featuring particular integrative norms.
The first two are ubiquitous, though contested, the third is stated here.
Deliberative theorists need to contemplate how practices that make sense
in each image connect to the other two. Forums only make sense when
linked in a system that can synthesize very different deliberative virtues
(notably, justification, reflection, and inclusion). Any system’s democratic
qualities can only be evaluated in terms of the polity. While judgment in
terms of the conditions of normative integration in the polity is therefore
primary, particular forums can promote deliberative authenticity in a
system, and systems enable inclusive application of deliberative ideals.
Deployed in this way, the three images help solve internal disputes and
respond to critics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 610-636 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Political Theory |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''The Forum, the System and the Polity: Three Varieties of Democratic Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver