The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing

Michael Kirby; Brian Fitzgerald; Adrian Sterling; Terry Cutler; Anne Fitzgerald; Lawrence Lessig; John Gilchrist

The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing

Michael Kirby, Brian Fitzgerald, Adrian Sterling, Terry Cutler, Anne Fitzgerald, Lawrence Lessig, John Gilchrist

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in Book › Chapter

Abstract

The Franki Committee reported in 1976 on a new technological means of disseminating information. It was tasked: To examine the question of the reprographic reproduction of works protected by copyright in Australia and to recommend any alterations to the Australian copyright law and any other measures it may consider necessary to effect a proper balance of interest between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in respect of reprographic reproduction. The term ‘reprographic reproduction’ includes any system or technique by which facsimile reproductions are made in any size or form. The Committee made over 30 recommendations for reform of the Copyright Act. I propose to concentrate on the two most significant ones. Both recommendations raise 21st century issues and illustrate the perennial problem in finding an equitable balance of interests in the law between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in response to technological change.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Copyright Future: Copyright Freedom: Marking the 40 Year Anniversary of the Commencement of Australia’s Copyright Act 1968
Editors	Brian Fitzgerald, Benedict Atkinson
Place of Publication	Sydney
Publisher	Sydney University Press
Pages	1-19
Number of pages	19
Edition	1
ISBN (Print)	9781920899714
Publication status	Published - 2011

Access to Document

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/41716/1/CopyrightFuture_TEXT.pdf

Cite this

Kirby, M., Fitzgerald, B., Sterling, A., Cutler, T., Fitzgerald, A., Lessig, L., & Gilchrist, J. (2011). The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing. In B. Fitzgerald, & B. Atkinson (Eds.), Copyright Future: Copyright Freedom: Marking the 40 Year Anniversary of the Commencement of Australia’s Copyright Act 1968 (1 ed., pp. 1-19). Sydney University Press. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/41716/1/CopyrightFuture_TEXT.pdf

@inbook{37c28346f1604ab792db0e922435e387,

title = "The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing",

abstract = "The Franki Committee reported in 1976 on a new technological means of disseminating information. It was tasked: To examine the question of the reprographic reproduction of works protected by copyright in Australia and to recommend any alterations to the Australian copyright law and any other measures it may consider necessary to effect a proper balance of interest between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in respect of reprographic reproduction. The term {\textquoteleft}reprographic reproduction{\textquoteright} includes any system or technique by which facsimile reproductions are made in any size or form. The Committee made over 30 recommendations for reform of the Copyright Act. I propose to concentrate on the two most significant ones. Both recommendations raise 21st century issues and illustrate the perennial problem in finding an equitable balance of interests in the law between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in response to technological change. ",

keywords = "Copyright, Franki Committee",

author = "Michael Kirby and Brian Fitzgerald and Adrian Sterling and Terry Cutler and Anne Fitzgerald and Lawrence Lessig and John Gilchrist",

year = "2011",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781920899714",

pages = "1--19",

editor = "Brian Fitzgerald and Benedict Atkinson",

booktitle = "Copyright Future: Copyright Freedom: Marking the 40 Year Anniversary of the Commencement of Australia{\textquoteright}s Copyright Act 1968",

publisher = "Sydney University Press",

address = "Australia",

edition = "1",

}

Kirby, M, Fitzgerald, B, Sterling, A, Cutler, T, Fitzgerald, A, Lessig, L & Gilchrist, J 2011, The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing. in B Fitzgerald & B Atkinson (eds), Copyright Future: Copyright Freedom: Marking the 40 Year Anniversary of the Commencement of Australia’s Copyright Act 1968. 1 edn, Sydney University Press, Sydney, pp. 1-19. <http://eprints.qut.edu.au/41716/1/CopyrightFuture_TEXT.pdf>

The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing. / Kirby, Michael; Fitzgerald, Brian; Sterling, Adrian et al.

Copyright Future: Copyright Freedom: Marking the 40 Year Anniversary of the Commencement of Australia’s Copyright Act 1968. ed. / Brian Fitzgerald; Benedict Atkinson. 1. ed. Sydney : Sydney University Press, 2011. p. 1-19.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in Book › Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing

AU - Kirby, Michael

AU - Fitzgerald, Brian

AU - Sterling, Adrian

AU - Cutler, Terry

AU - Fitzgerald, Anne

AU - Lessig, Lawrence

AU - Gilchrist, John

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The Franki Committee reported in 1976 on a new technological means of disseminating information. It was tasked: To examine the question of the reprographic reproduction of works protected by copyright in Australia and to recommend any alterations to the Australian copyright law and any other measures it may consider necessary to effect a proper balance of interest between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in respect of reprographic reproduction. The term ‘reprographic reproduction’ includes any system or technique by which facsimile reproductions are made in any size or form. The Committee made over 30 recommendations for reform of the Copyright Act. I propose to concentrate on the two most significant ones. Both recommendations raise 21st century issues and illustrate the perennial problem in finding an equitable balance of interests in the law between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in response to technological change.

AB - The Franki Committee reported in 1976 on a new technological means of disseminating information. It was tasked: To examine the question of the reprographic reproduction of works protected by copyright in Australia and to recommend any alterations to the Australian copyright law and any other measures it may consider necessary to effect a proper balance of interest between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in respect of reprographic reproduction. The term ‘reprographic reproduction’ includes any system or technique by which facsimile reproductions are made in any size or form. The Committee made over 30 recommendations for reform of the Copyright Act. I propose to concentrate on the two most significant ones. Both recommendations raise 21st century issues and illustrate the perennial problem in finding an equitable balance of interests in the law between owners of copyright and users of copyright material in response to technological change.

KW - Copyright

KW - Franki Committee

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781920899714

SP - 1

EP - 19

BT - Copyright Future: Copyright Freedom: Marking the 40 Year Anniversary of the Commencement of Australia’s Copyright Act 1968

A2 - Fitzgerald, Brian

A2 - Atkinson, Benedict

PB - Sydney University Press

CY - Sydney

ER -

The Franki Committee (1976 Report) and Statutory Licensing

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this