The Frightening Inadequacy of Economics as a Worldview: A Reply to Professor Hsiung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

My response to Professor Hsiung follows on suggestions made at the American Economic Association which advocated the mass education of the general population in the principles of economics and the propagation of an economic worldview. He recommends a popular programme of propaganda subtlety inculcate the populace into an economist’s view of thinking. As a starting point for this program there must be some consensus on the topic of what
economic thinking and worldviews must be. He attempts this task by plotting the range of views within the discipline and then distilling an essence from which he develops the economics worldview. Professor Hsiung’s article is in two
parts. The first part is a general response to economics as a world view. The second follows and addresses the specific arguments raised in this article. I will argue that he has failed to convincingly identify a core to economics, that core he does identify is not unique to economics and is insufficient for developing a worldview. Finally I argue that a true economic worldview would have certain specific contours which he has failed to identify and develop.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-464
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Interdisciplinary Economics
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

World view
Economics
Propaganda
Economists
Propagation
Principles of economics
General population
Education

Cite this

@article{d688ba4df2b6484cbdd565e1b131481b,
title = "The Frightening Inadequacy of Economics as a Worldview: A Reply to Professor Hsiung",
abstract = "My response to Professor Hsiung follows on suggestions made at the American Economic Association which advocated the mass education of the general population in the principles of economics and the propagation of an economic worldview. He recommends a popular programme of propaganda subtlety inculcate the populace into an economist’s view of thinking. As a starting point for this program there must be some consensus on the topic of whateconomic thinking and worldviews must be. He attempts this task by plotting the range of views within the discipline and then distilling an essence from which he develops the economics worldview. Professor Hsiung’s article is in twoparts. The first part is a general response to economics as a world view. The second follows and addresses the specific arguments raised in this article. I will argue that he has failed to convincingly identify a core to economics, that core he does identify is not unique to economics and is insufficient for developing a worldview. Finally I argue that a true economic worldview would have certain specific contours which he has failed to identify and develop.",
author = "Benedict Sheehy",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1177/02601079X06001700405",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "445--464",
journal = "Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics",
issn = "0260-1079",
publisher = "A B Academic Publishers",
number = "4",

}

The Frightening Inadequacy of Economics as a Worldview: A Reply to Professor Hsiung. / Sheehy, Benedict.

In: Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2006, p. 445-464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Frightening Inadequacy of Economics as a Worldview: A Reply to Professor Hsiung

AU - Sheehy, Benedict

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - My response to Professor Hsiung follows on suggestions made at the American Economic Association which advocated the mass education of the general population in the principles of economics and the propagation of an economic worldview. He recommends a popular programme of propaganda subtlety inculcate the populace into an economist’s view of thinking. As a starting point for this program there must be some consensus on the topic of whateconomic thinking and worldviews must be. He attempts this task by plotting the range of views within the discipline and then distilling an essence from which he develops the economics worldview. Professor Hsiung’s article is in twoparts. The first part is a general response to economics as a world view. The second follows and addresses the specific arguments raised in this article. I will argue that he has failed to convincingly identify a core to economics, that core he does identify is not unique to economics and is insufficient for developing a worldview. Finally I argue that a true economic worldview would have certain specific contours which he has failed to identify and develop.

AB - My response to Professor Hsiung follows on suggestions made at the American Economic Association which advocated the mass education of the general population in the principles of economics and the propagation of an economic worldview. He recommends a popular programme of propaganda subtlety inculcate the populace into an economist’s view of thinking. As a starting point for this program there must be some consensus on the topic of whateconomic thinking and worldviews must be. He attempts this task by plotting the range of views within the discipline and then distilling an essence from which he develops the economics worldview. Professor Hsiung’s article is in twoparts. The first part is a general response to economics as a world view. The second follows and addresses the specific arguments raised in this article. I will argue that he has failed to convincingly identify a core to economics, that core he does identify is not unique to economics and is insufficient for developing a worldview. Finally I argue that a true economic worldview would have certain specific contours which he has failed to identify and develop.

U2 - 10.1177/02601079X06001700405

DO - 10.1177/02601079X06001700405

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 445

EP - 464

JO - Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics

JF - Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics

SN - 0260-1079

IS - 4

ER -