The G20, human health and sustainability: An interview with Jeffrey D Sachs

Colin D. Butler, Peter W. Tait

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

    Abstract

    TO THE EDITOR: Pitney has strongly rebutted the views of Sachs (on development) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (on climate science).1While we agree that free speech is vital, we also assert that science, however flawed, is preferable to dogma and opinion, whether held and expressed by followers of Galen, any religion, or a master under whose tutelage someone studied long ago.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberMJA202(5)
    Pages (from-to)242-242
    Number of pages1
    JournalMedical Journal of Australia
    Volume202
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The G20, human health and sustainability: An interview with Jeffrey D Sachs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this