Abstract
With the development of the latest DSM and ICD classifications, borderline intellectual functioning has ceased to be conceptualised as a diagnostic code and is increasingly less a focus of clinical attention. Even though DSM 5 does not provide a specific recommendation for identification of borderline intellectual functioning, unlike the ICD, it advocates an innovative non-Gaussian neurodevelopmental approach to differential diagnosis between mild intellectual disability/intellectual developmental disorder (ID/IDD) and borderline intellectual functioning. The absence of a definition of borderline intellectual functioning therefore begs the question as to how such a differential diagnosis can be made between mild ID/IDD and borderline intellectual functioning in the absence of any specified criteria—an obvious contradiction in terms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 8-8 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | The Lancet Psychiatry |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Girona declaration on borderline intellectual functioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver