The good society versus the state

Freedom and necessity in political innovation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As a practical enterprise, political inquiry has historically tried to address as well as to understand the world. The recent efforts of political theorists in this regard have generally involved the articulation of visions of the good society which are inattentive to real-world constraints. On the other hand, empirical work which has dealt with structural questions normally proceeds in deterministic terms, especially in regard to the constraints under which states operate. A productive combination of the two traditions would have political theory supply the conceptual resources to counteract the imaginative deficiencies of empirical work. The latter in its turn would supply empirical resources to counteract the idealism of political theory. This combination is deployed here to discover and enumerate spaces for freedom in political innovation amid structural necessity. These spaces are discovered in connection with depression, war, local politics, collapsed peripheries, autonomous public spheres, revolution, the international system, and functional indeterminacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)518-540
Number of pages23
JournalThe Journal of Politics
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

political theory
innovation
idealism
local politics
international system
resources
Society

Cite this

@article{d137c5f3c4b2482790119edea190fe0d,
title = "The good society versus the state: Freedom and necessity in political innovation",
abstract = "As a practical enterprise, political inquiry has historically tried to address as well as to understand the world. The recent efforts of political theorists in this regard have generally involved the articulation of visions of the good society which are inattentive to real-world constraints. On the other hand, empirical work which has dealt with structural questions normally proceeds in deterministic terms, especially in regard to the constraints under which states operate. A productive combination of the two traditions would have political theory supply the conceptual resources to counteract the imaginative deficiencies of empirical work. The latter in its turn would supply empirical resources to counteract the idealism of political theory. This combination is deployed here to discover and enumerate spaces for freedom in political innovation amid structural necessity. These spaces are discovered in connection with depression, war, local politics, collapsed peripheries, autonomous public spheres, revolution, the international system, and functional indeterminacy.",
author = "Dryzek, {John S.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.2307/2132037",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "518--540",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The good society versus the state : Freedom and necessity in political innovation. / Dryzek, John S.

In: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2, 1992, p. 518-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The good society versus the state

T2 - Freedom and necessity in political innovation

AU - Dryzek, John S.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - As a practical enterprise, political inquiry has historically tried to address as well as to understand the world. The recent efforts of political theorists in this regard have generally involved the articulation of visions of the good society which are inattentive to real-world constraints. On the other hand, empirical work which has dealt with structural questions normally proceeds in deterministic terms, especially in regard to the constraints under which states operate. A productive combination of the two traditions would have political theory supply the conceptual resources to counteract the imaginative deficiencies of empirical work. The latter in its turn would supply empirical resources to counteract the idealism of political theory. This combination is deployed here to discover and enumerate spaces for freedom in political innovation amid structural necessity. These spaces are discovered in connection with depression, war, local politics, collapsed peripheries, autonomous public spheres, revolution, the international system, and functional indeterminacy.

AB - As a practical enterprise, political inquiry has historically tried to address as well as to understand the world. The recent efforts of political theorists in this regard have generally involved the articulation of visions of the good society which are inattentive to real-world constraints. On the other hand, empirical work which has dealt with structural questions normally proceeds in deterministic terms, especially in regard to the constraints under which states operate. A productive combination of the two traditions would have political theory supply the conceptual resources to counteract the imaginative deficiencies of empirical work. The latter in its turn would supply empirical resources to counteract the idealism of political theory. This combination is deployed here to discover and enumerate spaces for freedom in political innovation amid structural necessity. These spaces are discovered in connection with depression, war, local politics, collapsed peripheries, autonomous public spheres, revolution, the international system, and functional indeterminacy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933492411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2132037

DO - 10.2307/2132037

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 518

EP - 540

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 2

ER -