The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia

J. Brim Box, L. Bledsoe, P. Box, A. Bubb, M. Campbell, G. Edwards, J. D. Fordyce, T. Guest, P. Hodgens, B. Kennedy, R. Kulitja, K. McConnell, P. J. McDonald, B. Miller, D. Mitchell, C. Nano, L. Richmond, A. C. Stricker, V. Caron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Invasive species can impact their new environments in different ways, including through exploitation competition and interference competition. For the past decade we have documented the severe degradation of central Australian waterholes by feral camels. Not surprisingly, large feral herbivores can have profound negative impacts on aquatic biodiversity. Less understood was the extent that feral camels impact on native terrestrial wildlife for access to water. From 2011 to 2013 we used camera traps at six waterholes in central Australia to document the co-occurrence of feral camels and some native wildlife. We used circular statistics and univariate analyses to evaluate activity budgets, visitation frequency and species co-occurrence for camels, dingoes and bird species that require daily or regular access to water. When camels were present, birds and dingoes visited waterholes less frequently than on days camels were absent. The daily activity budget of birds shifted when camels and dingoes were present, and dingo activity shifted when camels were present. Although the temporal overlap of camels and birds was low, it was not less than expected by chance. Our data suggest that feral camels are the superior resource exploiter at these arid waterholes and reduce wildlife visitation and alter activity budgets. It remains to be tested whether this translates to longer-term impacts on native birds and dingoes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-93
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Zoology
Volume309
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

camels
wildlife
activity pattern
dingoes
bird
interference competition
birds
invasive species
herbivore
biodiversity
water
degradation
resource
cameras
herbivores
statistics
traps

Cite this

Brim Box, J., Bledsoe, L., Box, P., Bubb, A., Campbell, M., Edwards, G., ... Caron, V. (2019). The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia. Journal of Zoology, 309(2), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12688
Brim Box, J. ; Bledsoe, L. ; Box, P. ; Bubb, A. ; Campbell, M. ; Edwards, G. ; Fordyce, J. D. ; Guest, T. ; Hodgens, P. ; Kennedy, B. ; Kulitja, R. ; McConnell, K. ; McDonald, P. J. ; Miller, B. ; Mitchell, D. ; Nano, C. ; Richmond, L. ; Stricker, A. C. ; Caron, V. / The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia. In: Journal of Zoology. 2019 ; Vol. 309, No. 2. pp. 84-93.
@article{74141117b77448b9ad05b55505232396,
title = "The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia",
abstract = "Invasive species can impact their new environments in different ways, including through exploitation competition and interference competition. For the past decade we have documented the severe degradation of central Australian waterholes by feral camels. Not surprisingly, large feral herbivores can have profound negative impacts on aquatic biodiversity. Less understood was the extent that feral camels impact on native terrestrial wildlife for access to water. From 2011 to 2013 we used camera traps at six waterholes in central Australia to document the co-occurrence of feral camels and some native wildlife. We used circular statistics and univariate analyses to evaluate activity budgets, visitation frequency and species co-occurrence for camels, dingoes and bird species that require daily or regular access to water. When camels were present, birds and dingoes visited waterholes less frequently than on days camels were absent. The daily activity budget of birds shifted when camels and dingoes were present, and dingo activity shifted when camels were present. Although the temporal overlap of camels and birds was low, it was not less than expected by chance. Our data suggest that feral camels are the superior resource exploiter at these arid waterholes and reduce wildlife visitation and alter activity budgets. It remains to be tested whether this translates to longer-term impacts on native birds and dingoes.",
keywords = "activity budgets, dingoes, feral camels, granivores, invasive species, temporal overlap, waterholes",
author = "{Brim Box}, J. and L. Bledsoe and P. Box and A. Bubb and M. Campbell and G. Edwards and Fordyce, {J. D.} and T. Guest and P. Hodgens and B. Kennedy and R. Kulitja and K. McConnell and McDonald, {P. J.} and B. Miller and D. Mitchell and C. Nano and L. Richmond and Stricker, {A. C.} and V. Caron",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/jzo.12688",
language = "English",
volume = "309",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Journal of Zoology",
issn = "0952-8369",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Brim Box, J, Bledsoe, L, Box, P, Bubb, A, Campbell, M, Edwards, G, Fordyce, JD, Guest, T, Hodgens, P, Kennedy, B, Kulitja, R, McConnell, K, McDonald, PJ, Miller, B, Mitchell, D, Nano, C, Richmond, L, Stricker, AC & Caron, V 2019, 'The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia', Journal of Zoology, vol. 309, no. 2, pp. 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12688

The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia. / Brim Box, J.; Bledsoe, L.; Box, P.; Bubb, A.; Campbell, M.; Edwards, G.; Fordyce, J. D.; Guest, T.; Hodgens, P.; Kennedy, B.; Kulitja, R.; McConnell, K.; McDonald, P. J.; Miller, B.; Mitchell, D.; Nano, C.; Richmond, L.; Stricker, A. C.; Caron, V.

In: Journal of Zoology, Vol. 309, No. 2, 10.2019, p. 84-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia

AU - Brim Box, J.

AU - Bledsoe, L.

AU - Box, P.

AU - Bubb, A.

AU - Campbell, M.

AU - Edwards, G.

AU - Fordyce, J. D.

AU - Guest, T.

AU - Hodgens, P.

AU - Kennedy, B.

AU - Kulitja, R.

AU - McConnell, K.

AU - McDonald, P. J.

AU - Miller, B.

AU - Mitchell, D.

AU - Nano, C.

AU - Richmond, L.

AU - Stricker, A. C.

AU - Caron, V.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Invasive species can impact their new environments in different ways, including through exploitation competition and interference competition. For the past decade we have documented the severe degradation of central Australian waterholes by feral camels. Not surprisingly, large feral herbivores can have profound negative impacts on aquatic biodiversity. Less understood was the extent that feral camels impact on native terrestrial wildlife for access to water. From 2011 to 2013 we used camera traps at six waterholes in central Australia to document the co-occurrence of feral camels and some native wildlife. We used circular statistics and univariate analyses to evaluate activity budgets, visitation frequency and species co-occurrence for camels, dingoes and bird species that require daily or regular access to water. When camels were present, birds and dingoes visited waterholes less frequently than on days camels were absent. The daily activity budget of birds shifted when camels and dingoes were present, and dingo activity shifted when camels were present. Although the temporal overlap of camels and birds was low, it was not less than expected by chance. Our data suggest that feral camels are the superior resource exploiter at these arid waterholes and reduce wildlife visitation and alter activity budgets. It remains to be tested whether this translates to longer-term impacts on native birds and dingoes.

AB - Invasive species can impact their new environments in different ways, including through exploitation competition and interference competition. For the past decade we have documented the severe degradation of central Australian waterholes by feral camels. Not surprisingly, large feral herbivores can have profound negative impacts on aquatic biodiversity. Less understood was the extent that feral camels impact on native terrestrial wildlife for access to water. From 2011 to 2013 we used camera traps at six waterholes in central Australia to document the co-occurrence of feral camels and some native wildlife. We used circular statistics and univariate analyses to evaluate activity budgets, visitation frequency and species co-occurrence for camels, dingoes and bird species that require daily or regular access to water. When camels were present, birds and dingoes visited waterholes less frequently than on days camels were absent. The daily activity budget of birds shifted when camels and dingoes were present, and dingo activity shifted when camels were present. Although the temporal overlap of camels and birds was low, it was not less than expected by chance. Our data suggest that feral camels are the superior resource exploiter at these arid waterholes and reduce wildlife visitation and alter activity budgets. It remains to be tested whether this translates to longer-term impacts on native birds and dingoes.

KW - activity budgets

KW - dingoes

KW - feral camels

KW - granivores

KW - invasive species

KW - temporal overlap

KW - waterholes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068081369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/impact-camel-visitation-native-wildlife-remote-waterholes-arid-australia

U2 - 10.1111/jzo.12688

DO - 10.1111/jzo.12688

M3 - Article

VL - 309

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Zoology

JF - Journal of Zoology

SN - 0952-8369

IS - 2

ER -

Brim Box J, Bledsoe L, Box P, Bubb A, Campbell M, Edwards G et al. The impact of camel visitation on native wildlife at remote waterholes in arid Australia. Journal of Zoology. 2019 Oct;309(2):84-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12688