The Impact of Foreign Ownership and Offshore Investing on Technical Efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese Managed Funds Industry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In a landmark reform in the managed fund industry, China permitted foreign joint ventures as well as off-shore investing. Have these decisions helped improved the efficiency of the industry? We examine this hitherto unexamined question in the literature, using a robust method of efficiency analysis—bootstrap data envelopment analysis. We compute the bootstrap efficiency scores and regress them using truncated regression on environmental variables. We focus on 64 of 69 funds management companies in China from 2003 to 2011 using a unique dataset made available to us. We find that there is considerable room for funds management companies to improve technical efficiency to ultimately bring increased benefits to investors. We find that foreign ownership has not helped efficiency improvement. Similarly, off-shore investing had no impact on technical efficiency. A number of regulatory constraints still persist in China, which makes it hard for the previously measured to yield efficiency gains. We recommend further liberalization of the sector, for example, by removing restriction on distribution of foreign funds
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)138-151
    Number of pages14
    JournalThe Journal of Wealth Management
    Volume18
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Industry
    Foreign ownership
    Investing
    Technical efficiency
    Managed funds
    China
    Fund management
    Joint ventures
    Bootstrap
    Truncated regression
    Liberalization
    Data envelopment analysis
    Investors
    Efficiency gains

    Cite this

    @article{7b8464fb43da4728951fdfa0c96132ef,
    title = "The Impact of Foreign Ownership and Offshore Investing on Technical Efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese Managed Funds Industry",
    abstract = "In a landmark reform in the managed fund industry, China permitted foreign joint ventures as well as off-shore investing. Have these decisions helped improved the efficiency of the industry? We examine this hitherto unexamined question in the literature, using a robust method of efficiency analysis—bootstrap data envelopment analysis. We compute the bootstrap efficiency scores and regress them using truncated regression on environmental variables. We focus on 64 of 69 funds management companies in China from 2003 to 2011 using a unique dataset made available to us. We find that there is considerable room for funds management companies to improve technical efficiency to ultimately bring increased benefits to investors. We find that foreign ownership has not helped efficiency improvement. Similarly, off-shore investing had no impact on technical efficiency. A number of regulatory constraints still persist in China, which makes it hard for the previously measured to yield efficiency gains. We recommend further liberalization of the sector, for example, by removing restriction on distribution of foreign funds",
    author = "Li Liu and Milind SATHYE",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.3905/jwm.2016.18.4.138",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "138--151",
    journal = "Journal of Wealth Management",
    issn = "1520-4154",
    publisher = "Institutional Investor, Inc",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Impact of Foreign Ownership and Offshore Investing on Technical Efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese Managed Funds Industry

    AU - Liu, Li

    AU - SATHYE, Milind

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - In a landmark reform in the managed fund industry, China permitted foreign joint ventures as well as off-shore investing. Have these decisions helped improved the efficiency of the industry? We examine this hitherto unexamined question in the literature, using a robust method of efficiency analysis—bootstrap data envelopment analysis. We compute the bootstrap efficiency scores and regress them using truncated regression on environmental variables. We focus on 64 of 69 funds management companies in China from 2003 to 2011 using a unique dataset made available to us. We find that there is considerable room for funds management companies to improve technical efficiency to ultimately bring increased benefits to investors. We find that foreign ownership has not helped efficiency improvement. Similarly, off-shore investing had no impact on technical efficiency. A number of regulatory constraints still persist in China, which makes it hard for the previously measured to yield efficiency gains. We recommend further liberalization of the sector, for example, by removing restriction on distribution of foreign funds

    AB - In a landmark reform in the managed fund industry, China permitted foreign joint ventures as well as off-shore investing. Have these decisions helped improved the efficiency of the industry? We examine this hitherto unexamined question in the literature, using a robust method of efficiency analysis—bootstrap data envelopment analysis. We compute the bootstrap efficiency scores and regress them using truncated regression on environmental variables. We focus on 64 of 69 funds management companies in China from 2003 to 2011 using a unique dataset made available to us. We find that there is considerable room for funds management companies to improve technical efficiency to ultimately bring increased benefits to investors. We find that foreign ownership has not helped efficiency improvement. Similarly, off-shore investing had no impact on technical efficiency. A number of regulatory constraints still persist in China, which makes it hard for the previously measured to yield efficiency gains. We recommend further liberalization of the sector, for example, by removing restriction on distribution of foreign funds

    U2 - 10.3905/jwm.2016.18.4.138

    DO - 10.3905/jwm.2016.18.4.138

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 138

    EP - 151

    JO - Journal of Wealth Management

    JF - Journal of Wealth Management

    SN - 1520-4154

    IS - 4

    ER -