The impact of geographic unit of analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant summary stage - a population-based study

Hanna Tervonen, Stephen Morrell, Sanchia Aranda, David Roder, Hui You, Theo NIYONSENGA, Richard Walton, Deborah Baker, David Currow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: When using area-level disadvantage measures, size of geographic unit can have major effects on recorded socioeconomic cancer disparities. This study examined the extent of changes in recorded socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant stage when the measure of socioeconomic disadvantage was based on smaller Census Collection Districts (CDs) instead of Statistical Local Areas (SLAs). Methods: Population-based New South Wales Cancer Registry data were used to identify cases diagnosed with primary invasive cancer in 2000–2008 (n=264,236). Logistic regression and competing risk regression modelling were performed to examine socioeconomic differences in odds of distant stage and hazard of cancer death for all sites combined and separately for breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancers. Results: For all sites collectively, associations between socioeconomic disadvantage and cancer survival and distant stage were stronger when the CD-based socioeconomic disadvantage measure was used compared with the SLA-based measure. The CD-based measure showed a more consistent socioeconomic gradient with a linear upward trend of risk of cancer death/distant stage with increasing socioeconomic disadvantage. Site-specific analyses provided similar findings for the risk of death but less consistent results for the likelihood of distant stage. Conclusions: The use of socioeconomic disadvantage measure based on the smallest available spatial unit should be encouraged in the future. Implications for public health: Disadvantage measures based on small spatial units can more accurately identify socioeconomic cancer disparities to inform priority settings in service planning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-136
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Population
Neoplasms
New South Wales
Censuses
Registries
Colorectal Neoplasms
Lung Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms
Public Health
Logistic Models
Breast Neoplasms

Cite this

Tervonen, Hanna ; Morrell, Stephen ; Aranda, Sanchia ; Roder, David ; You, Hui ; NIYONSENGA, Theo ; Walton, Richard ; Baker, Deborah ; Currow, David. / The impact of geographic unit of analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant summary stage - a population-based study. In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2017 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 130-136.
@article{becbd8cf9fe84f889b244eafcadcf1f1,
title = "The impact of geographic unit of analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant summary stage - a population-based study",
abstract = "Objective: When using area-level disadvantage measures, size of geographic unit can have major effects on recorded socioeconomic cancer disparities. This study examined the extent of changes in recorded socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant stage when the measure of socioeconomic disadvantage was based on smaller Census Collection Districts (CDs) instead of Statistical Local Areas (SLAs). Methods: Population-based New South Wales Cancer Registry data were used to identify cases diagnosed with primary invasive cancer in 2000–2008 (n=264,236). Logistic regression and competing risk regression modelling were performed to examine socioeconomic differences in odds of distant stage and hazard of cancer death for all sites combined and separately for breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancers. Results: For all sites collectively, associations between socioeconomic disadvantage and cancer survival and distant stage were stronger when the CD-based socioeconomic disadvantage measure was used compared with the SLA-based measure. The CD-based measure showed a more consistent socioeconomic gradient with a linear upward trend of risk of cancer death/distant stage with increasing socioeconomic disadvantage. Site-specific analyses provided similar findings for the risk of death but less consistent results for the likelihood of distant stage. Conclusions: The use of socioeconomic disadvantage measure based on the smallest available spatial unit should be encouraged in the future. Implications for public health: Disadvantage measures based on small spatial units can more accurately identify socioeconomic cancer disparities to inform priority settings in service planning.",
keywords = "Australia, neoplasms, socioeconomic factors, staging, survival analysis",
author = "Hanna Tervonen and Stephen Morrell and Sanchia Aranda and David Roder and Hui You and Theo NIYONSENGA and Richard Walton and Deborah Baker and David Currow",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/1753-6405.12608",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "130--136",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1326-0200",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

The impact of geographic unit of analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant summary stage - a population-based study. / Tervonen, Hanna; Morrell, Stephen; Aranda, Sanchia; Roder, David; You, Hui; NIYONSENGA, Theo; Walton, Richard; Baker, Deborah; Currow, David.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2017, p. 130-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of geographic unit of analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant summary stage - a population-based study

AU - Tervonen, Hanna

AU - Morrell, Stephen

AU - Aranda, Sanchia

AU - Roder, David

AU - You, Hui

AU - NIYONSENGA, Theo

AU - Walton, Richard

AU - Baker, Deborah

AU - Currow, David

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: When using area-level disadvantage measures, size of geographic unit can have major effects on recorded socioeconomic cancer disparities. This study examined the extent of changes in recorded socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant stage when the measure of socioeconomic disadvantage was based on smaller Census Collection Districts (CDs) instead of Statistical Local Areas (SLAs). Methods: Population-based New South Wales Cancer Registry data were used to identify cases diagnosed with primary invasive cancer in 2000–2008 (n=264,236). Logistic regression and competing risk regression modelling were performed to examine socioeconomic differences in odds of distant stage and hazard of cancer death for all sites combined and separately for breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancers. Results: For all sites collectively, associations between socioeconomic disadvantage and cancer survival and distant stage were stronger when the CD-based socioeconomic disadvantage measure was used compared with the SLA-based measure. The CD-based measure showed a more consistent socioeconomic gradient with a linear upward trend of risk of cancer death/distant stage with increasing socioeconomic disadvantage. Site-specific analyses provided similar findings for the risk of death but less consistent results for the likelihood of distant stage. Conclusions: The use of socioeconomic disadvantage measure based on the smallest available spatial unit should be encouraged in the future. Implications for public health: Disadvantage measures based on small spatial units can more accurately identify socioeconomic cancer disparities to inform priority settings in service planning.

AB - Objective: When using area-level disadvantage measures, size of geographic unit can have major effects on recorded socioeconomic cancer disparities. This study examined the extent of changes in recorded socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant stage when the measure of socioeconomic disadvantage was based on smaller Census Collection Districts (CDs) instead of Statistical Local Areas (SLAs). Methods: Population-based New South Wales Cancer Registry data were used to identify cases diagnosed with primary invasive cancer in 2000–2008 (n=264,236). Logistic regression and competing risk regression modelling were performed to examine socioeconomic differences in odds of distant stage and hazard of cancer death for all sites combined and separately for breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancers. Results: For all sites collectively, associations between socioeconomic disadvantage and cancer survival and distant stage were stronger when the CD-based socioeconomic disadvantage measure was used compared with the SLA-based measure. The CD-based measure showed a more consistent socioeconomic gradient with a linear upward trend of risk of cancer death/distant stage with increasing socioeconomic disadvantage. Site-specific analyses provided similar findings for the risk of death but less consistent results for the likelihood of distant stage. Conclusions: The use of socioeconomic disadvantage measure based on the smallest available spatial unit should be encouraged in the future. Implications for public health: Disadvantage measures based on small spatial units can more accurately identify socioeconomic cancer disparities to inform priority settings in service planning.

KW - Australia

KW - neoplasms

KW - socioeconomic factors

KW - staging

KW - survival analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006812888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12608

DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12608

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 130

EP - 136

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

SN - 1326-0200

IS - 2

ER -