The impact of the US retreat from the Paris Agreement: Kyoto revisited?

Jonathan Pickering, Jeffrey S. McGee, Tim Stephens, Sylvia I. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United States’ decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement (pending possible re-engagement under different terms) may have significant ramifications for international climate policy, but the implications of this decision remain contested. This commentary illustrates how comparative analysis of US participation in multilateral environmental agreements can inform predictions and future assessments of the decision. We compare and contrast US non-participation in the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, focusing on four key areas that may condition the influence of US treaty decisions on international climate policy: (i) global momentum on climate change mitigation; (ii) the possibility of US non participation giving rise to alternative forms of international collaboration on climate policy; (iii) the timing and circumstances of the US decision to exit; and (iv) the influence of treaty design on countries’ incentives to participate and comply. We find that differences across the two treaties relating to the first three factors are more likely to reduce the negative ramifications of US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement compared to the Kyoto Protocol. However, the increased urgency of deep decarbonization renders US non-participation a major concern despite its declining share of global emissions. Moreover, key design features of the Paris Agreement suggest that other countries may react to the US decision by scaling back their levels of ambition and compliance, even if they remain in the Agreement.



Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)818-827
Number of pages10
JournalClimate Policy
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

environmental policy
Kyoto Protocol
compliance
decision
incentive
momentum
prediction
treaty
participation
Climate policy
Treaties
Participation
climate change mitigation
analysis

Cite this

Pickering, Jonathan ; McGee, Jeffrey S. ; Stephens, Tim ; Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I. / The impact of the US retreat from the Paris Agreement: Kyoto revisited?. In: Climate Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 7. pp. 818-827.
@article{59b6a0c37c074220b6212c0cb042c1a4,
title = "The impact of the US retreat from the Paris Agreement: Kyoto revisited?",
abstract = "The United States’ decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement (pending possible re-engagement under different terms) may have significant ramifications for international climate policy, but the implications of this decision remain contested. This commentary illustrates how comparative analysis of US participation in multilateral environmental agreements can inform predictions and future assessments of the decision. We compare and contrast US non-participation in the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, focusing on four key areas that may condition the influence of US treaty decisions on international climate policy: (i) global momentum on climate change mitigation; (ii) the possibility of US non participation giving rise to alternative forms of international collaboration on climate policy; (iii) the timing and circumstances of the US decision to exit; and (iv) the influence of treaty design on countries’ incentives to participate and comply. We find that differences across the two treaties relating to the first three factors are more likely to reduce the negative ramifications of US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement compared to the Kyoto Protocol. However, the increased urgency of deep decarbonization renders US non-participation a major concern despite its declining share of global emissions. Moreover, key design features of the Paris Agreement suggest that other countries may react to the US decision by scaling back their levels of ambition and compliance, even if they remain in the Agreement.",
keywords = "Kyoto Protocol, Paris Agreement, treaty withdrawal, United States of America",
author = "Jonathan Pickering and McGee, {Jeffrey S.} and Tim Stephens and Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, {Sylvia I.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/14693062.2017.1412934",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "818--827",
journal = "Climate Policy",
issn = "1469-3062",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

The impact of the US retreat from the Paris Agreement: Kyoto revisited? / Pickering, Jonathan; McGee, Jeffrey S.; Stephens, Tim; Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I.

In: Climate Policy, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2018, p. 818-827.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of the US retreat from the Paris Agreement: Kyoto revisited?

AU - Pickering, Jonathan

AU - McGee, Jeffrey S.

AU - Stephens, Tim

AU - Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The United States’ decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement (pending possible re-engagement under different terms) may have significant ramifications for international climate policy, but the implications of this decision remain contested. This commentary illustrates how comparative analysis of US participation in multilateral environmental agreements can inform predictions and future assessments of the decision. We compare and contrast US non-participation in the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, focusing on four key areas that may condition the influence of US treaty decisions on international climate policy: (i) global momentum on climate change mitigation; (ii) the possibility of US non participation giving rise to alternative forms of international collaboration on climate policy; (iii) the timing and circumstances of the US decision to exit; and (iv) the influence of treaty design on countries’ incentives to participate and comply. We find that differences across the two treaties relating to the first three factors are more likely to reduce the negative ramifications of US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement compared to the Kyoto Protocol. However, the increased urgency of deep decarbonization renders US non-participation a major concern despite its declining share of global emissions. Moreover, key design features of the Paris Agreement suggest that other countries may react to the US decision by scaling back their levels of ambition and compliance, even if they remain in the Agreement.

AB - The United States’ decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement (pending possible re-engagement under different terms) may have significant ramifications for international climate policy, but the implications of this decision remain contested. This commentary illustrates how comparative analysis of US participation in multilateral environmental agreements can inform predictions and future assessments of the decision. We compare and contrast US non-participation in the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, focusing on four key areas that may condition the influence of US treaty decisions on international climate policy: (i) global momentum on climate change mitigation; (ii) the possibility of US non participation giving rise to alternative forms of international collaboration on climate policy; (iii) the timing and circumstances of the US decision to exit; and (iv) the influence of treaty design on countries’ incentives to participate and comply. We find that differences across the two treaties relating to the first three factors are more likely to reduce the negative ramifications of US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement compared to the Kyoto Protocol. However, the increased urgency of deep decarbonization renders US non-participation a major concern despite its declining share of global emissions. Moreover, key design features of the Paris Agreement suggest that other countries may react to the US decision by scaling back their levels of ambition and compliance, even if they remain in the Agreement.

KW - Kyoto Protocol

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - treaty withdrawal

KW - United States of America

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038360967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14693062.2017.1412934

DO - 10.1080/14693062.2017.1412934

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 818

EP - 827

JO - Climate Policy

JF - Climate Policy

SN - 1469-3062

IS - 7

ER -