The Impacts of Mandatory Design Competitions on Urban Design Quality in Sydney, Australia

Gethin Davison, Robert Freestone, Richard HU, Sarah Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The pursuit of high-quality urban design through the planning process is made challenging by two key problematics. First, control over the decisions that produce or alter the built environment is differentially distributed across numerous public and private agents. Second, there is little agreement about what ‘good’ urban design is and how it is best pursued. Recognizing this, the focus in this paper is on how these two problematics are being tackled through a unique design control initiative in Sydney, Australia. This initiative requires that all major property developments are subject to a design competition before they can be approved. The paper reports the findings of 41 stakeholder interviews and appraisals of 25 projects completed under these provisions. These findings indicate that mandated design competitions have helped force a general raising of urban design quality by re-distributing decision-making control and enabling a broad but non-prescriptive approach to the regulation of design excellence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-277
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Urban Design
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

urban design
planning process
stakeholder
decision making
regulation
interview
Urban Design
Design Competition

Cite this

Davison, Gethin ; Freestone, Robert ; HU, Richard ; Baker, Sarah. / The Impacts of Mandatory Design Competitions on Urban Design Quality in Sydney, Australia. In: Journal of Urban Design. 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 257-277.
@article{0c5a7ceed738427fbd7e0f35a803738f,
title = "The Impacts of Mandatory Design Competitions on Urban Design Quality in Sydney, Australia",
abstract = "The pursuit of high-quality urban design through the planning process is made challenging by two key problematics. First, control over the decisions that produce or alter the built environment is differentially distributed across numerous public and private agents. Second, there is little agreement about what ‘good’ urban design is and how it is best pursued. Recognizing this, the focus in this paper is on how these two problematics are being tackled through a unique design control initiative in Sydney, Australia. This initiative requires that all major property developments are subject to a design competition before they can be approved. The paper reports the findings of 41 stakeholder interviews and appraisals of 25 projects completed under these provisions. These findings indicate that mandated design competitions have helped force a general raising of urban design quality by re-distributing decision-making control and enabling a broad but non-prescriptive approach to the regulation of design excellence.",
author = "Gethin Davison and Robert Freestone and Richard HU and Sarah Baker",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13574809.2017.1337497",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "257--277",
journal = "Journal of Urban Design",
issn = "1357-4809",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

The Impacts of Mandatory Design Competitions on Urban Design Quality in Sydney, Australia. / Davison, Gethin; Freestone, Robert; HU, Richard; Baker, Sarah.

In: Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 23, No. 2, 04.03.2018, p. 257-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impacts of Mandatory Design Competitions on Urban Design Quality in Sydney, Australia

AU - Davison, Gethin

AU - Freestone, Robert

AU - HU, Richard

AU - Baker, Sarah

PY - 2018/3/4

Y1 - 2018/3/4

N2 - The pursuit of high-quality urban design through the planning process is made challenging by two key problematics. First, control over the decisions that produce or alter the built environment is differentially distributed across numerous public and private agents. Second, there is little agreement about what ‘good’ urban design is and how it is best pursued. Recognizing this, the focus in this paper is on how these two problematics are being tackled through a unique design control initiative in Sydney, Australia. This initiative requires that all major property developments are subject to a design competition before they can be approved. The paper reports the findings of 41 stakeholder interviews and appraisals of 25 projects completed under these provisions. These findings indicate that mandated design competitions have helped force a general raising of urban design quality by re-distributing decision-making control and enabling a broad but non-prescriptive approach to the regulation of design excellence.

AB - The pursuit of high-quality urban design through the planning process is made challenging by two key problematics. First, control over the decisions that produce or alter the built environment is differentially distributed across numerous public and private agents. Second, there is little agreement about what ‘good’ urban design is and how it is best pursued. Recognizing this, the focus in this paper is on how these two problematics are being tackled through a unique design control initiative in Sydney, Australia. This initiative requires that all major property developments are subject to a design competition before they can be approved. The paper reports the findings of 41 stakeholder interviews and appraisals of 25 projects completed under these provisions. These findings indicate that mandated design competitions have helped force a general raising of urban design quality by re-distributing decision-making control and enabling a broad but non-prescriptive approach to the regulation of design excellence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021785485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13574809.2017.1337497

DO - 10.1080/13574809.2017.1337497

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 257

EP - 277

JO - Journal of Urban Design

JF - Journal of Urban Design

SN - 1357-4809

IS - 2

ER -