Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The importance of assessing ‘Better Access’ appropriately: Asking the right question is an essential first step

  • Timothy A. Carey
  • , Sally Bradford

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Jorm’s (2018) Better Access (BA) article highlights the urgent need for improved evaluation of publicly funded mental health interventions to ensure the prudent use of finite financial resources. Furthermore, Jorm notes that major determinants of mental health may limit treatment impact when such factors remain unaddressed.
    Importantly, however, the limitations of the data acknowledged by Jorm indicate not only the extent to which his conclusions should be questioned but also a crucial area that requires immediate attention. Improvements in the data collected are required to evaluate BA appropriately.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)264-265
    Number of pages2
    JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
    Volume53
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of assessing ‘Better Access’ appropriately: Asking the right question is an essential first step'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this