The Labour Party and neighbourhood decentralisation

Flirtation or commitment?

Kristine Beuret, Gerry Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the 1980s a number of Labour local authorities committed themselves to decentralising service delivery to neighbourhood bases and establishing new mechanisms of consumer control. Achievements in practice have been limited. This article examines the reasons behind the failure to push ahead aggressively with decentralisation. Public expenditure constraints and the resistance of established organisational interests are identified as important factors. It is further argued that on close examination the nature of Labour's support for decentralisation is, in some cases, conditional and pragmatic, and in others, it is riddled with contradictions and tensions. In short, Labour's failure reflects an under lying uncertainty about whether it wants a full-blooded decentralisation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-22
Number of pages19
JournalCritical Social Policy
Volume6
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Labour Party
decentralization
commitment
labor
public expenditures
pragmatics
uncertainty
examination

Cite this

@article{0ac9520bebe74921acb993343f3b957c,
title = "The Labour Party and neighbourhood decentralisation: Flirtation or commitment?",
abstract = "During the 1980s a number of Labour local authorities committed themselves to decentralising service delivery to neighbourhood bases and establishing new mechanisms of consumer control. Achievements in practice have been limited. This article examines the reasons behind the failure to push ahead aggressively with decentralisation. Public expenditure constraints and the resistance of established organisational interests are identified as important factors. It is further argued that on close examination the nature of Labour's support for decentralisation is, in some cases, conditional and pragmatic, and in others, it is riddled with contradictions and tensions. In short, Labour's failure reflects an under lying uncertainty about whether it wants a full-blooded decentralisation.",
author = "Kristine Beuret and Gerry Stoker",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1177/026101838600601701",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "4--22",
journal = "Critical Social Policy",
issn = "0261-0183",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "17",

}

The Labour Party and neighbourhood decentralisation : Flirtation or commitment? / Beuret, Kristine; Stoker, Gerry.

In: Critical Social Policy, Vol. 6, No. 17, 1986, p. 4-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Labour Party and neighbourhood decentralisation

T2 - Flirtation or commitment?

AU - Beuret, Kristine

AU - Stoker, Gerry

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - During the 1980s a number of Labour local authorities committed themselves to decentralising service delivery to neighbourhood bases and establishing new mechanisms of consumer control. Achievements in practice have been limited. This article examines the reasons behind the failure to push ahead aggressively with decentralisation. Public expenditure constraints and the resistance of established organisational interests are identified as important factors. It is further argued that on close examination the nature of Labour's support for decentralisation is, in some cases, conditional and pragmatic, and in others, it is riddled with contradictions and tensions. In short, Labour's failure reflects an under lying uncertainty about whether it wants a full-blooded decentralisation.

AB - During the 1980s a number of Labour local authorities committed themselves to decentralising service delivery to neighbourhood bases and establishing new mechanisms of consumer control. Achievements in practice have been limited. This article examines the reasons behind the failure to push ahead aggressively with decentralisation. Public expenditure constraints and the resistance of established organisational interests are identified as important factors. It is further argued that on close examination the nature of Labour's support for decentralisation is, in some cases, conditional and pragmatic, and in others, it is riddled with contradictions and tensions. In short, Labour's failure reflects an under lying uncertainty about whether it wants a full-blooded decentralisation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959410842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/026101838600601701

DO - 10.1177/026101838600601701

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 4

EP - 22

JO - Critical Social Policy

JF - Critical Social Policy

SN - 0261-0183

IS - 17

ER -