The Legitimacy of Multilateral Climate Governance: A Deliberative Democratic Approach

Hayley Stevenson, John Dryzek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For almost three decades, the international community has grappled with the challenge of avoiding dangerous global climate change. The failure to produce a new comprehensive treaty in Copenhagen, in 2009, provoked debate about appropriate decision-making processes. Multilateralism has lost favor and credibility, while 'minilateralism' appears to be an idea whose time has come. Reconciling this approach with growing demands for legitimacy in global governance will be difficult but essential. Existing proposals for reforming multilateral negotiations promise greater effectiveness, but fall short on legitimacy. We propose that the dilemma of securing both effectiveness and legitimacy can be resolved in a deliberative democratic model that combines minilateralism with discursive representation. Legitimacy is therein sought in the resonance of collective decisions with public opinion, defined in terms of the provisional outcome of the engagement and contestation of discourses
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalCritical Policy Studies
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

legitimacy
climate
governance
collective decision
multilateralism
global governance
treaty
credibility
decision-making process
public opinion
climate change
discourse
community

Cite this

@article{3eaed480732143db9f27ee6a8e273ca1,
title = "The Legitimacy of Multilateral Climate Governance: A Deliberative Democratic Approach",
abstract = "For almost three decades, the international community has grappled with the challenge of avoiding dangerous global climate change. The failure to produce a new comprehensive treaty in Copenhagen, in 2009, provoked debate about appropriate decision-making processes. Multilateralism has lost favor and credibility, while 'minilateralism' appears to be an idea whose time has come. Reconciling this approach with growing demands for legitimacy in global governance will be difficult but essential. Existing proposals for reforming multilateral negotiations promise greater effectiveness, but fall short on legitimacy. We propose that the dilemma of securing both effectiveness and legitimacy can be resolved in a deliberative democratic model that combines minilateralism with discursive representation. Legitimacy is therein sought in the resonance of collective decisions with public opinion, defined in terms of the provisional outcome of the engagement and contestation of discourses",
author = "Hayley Stevenson and John Dryzek",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/19460171.2012.659879",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Critical Policy Studies",
issn = "1946-0171",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

The Legitimacy of Multilateral Climate Governance: A Deliberative Democratic Approach. / Stevenson, Hayley; Dryzek, John.

In: Critical Policy Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2012, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Legitimacy of Multilateral Climate Governance: A Deliberative Democratic Approach

AU - Stevenson, Hayley

AU - Dryzek, John

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - For almost three decades, the international community has grappled with the challenge of avoiding dangerous global climate change. The failure to produce a new comprehensive treaty in Copenhagen, in 2009, provoked debate about appropriate decision-making processes. Multilateralism has lost favor and credibility, while 'minilateralism' appears to be an idea whose time has come. Reconciling this approach with growing demands for legitimacy in global governance will be difficult but essential. Existing proposals for reforming multilateral negotiations promise greater effectiveness, but fall short on legitimacy. We propose that the dilemma of securing both effectiveness and legitimacy can be resolved in a deliberative democratic model that combines minilateralism with discursive representation. Legitimacy is therein sought in the resonance of collective decisions with public opinion, defined in terms of the provisional outcome of the engagement and contestation of discourses

AB - For almost three decades, the international community has grappled with the challenge of avoiding dangerous global climate change. The failure to produce a new comprehensive treaty in Copenhagen, in 2009, provoked debate about appropriate decision-making processes. Multilateralism has lost favor and credibility, while 'minilateralism' appears to be an idea whose time has come. Reconciling this approach with growing demands for legitimacy in global governance will be difficult but essential. Existing proposals for reforming multilateral negotiations promise greater effectiveness, but fall short on legitimacy. We propose that the dilemma of securing both effectiveness and legitimacy can be resolved in a deliberative democratic model that combines minilateralism with discursive representation. Legitimacy is therein sought in the resonance of collective decisions with public opinion, defined in terms of the provisional outcome of the engagement and contestation of discourses

U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2012.659879

DO - 10.1080/19460171.2012.659879

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Critical Policy Studies

JF - Critical Policy Studies

SN - 1946-0171

IS - 1

ER -