The lifecourse of place: Looking past paradigms and metaphors to the just nature of place-health – A rejoinder to Andrews’

Peter Lekkas, Catherine Paquet, Natasha J. Howard, Mark Daniel

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Some twenty years ago Baum (1995, p.464) wrote in this journal that “Public health has … both to describe and to understand communities”. To achieve these objectives she recommended that public health research “should adopt a social view of health [and] not be dogmatically dominated by any one discipline or method” (Baum, 1995, p.466). We agree, though not simply as researchers with a vested interest in public health, but as researchers each with their own disciplinary backgrounds.Elsewhere we have discussed the value of an engaged discourse that spans disciplinary bounds as important to efforts that aim to understand, enable and promote population levels of health (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). Moreover, we have argued for an ideal where knowledge and understanding are progressed through dialogue and inquiry enacted from positions of opposition (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). These values mirror an objective of this journal; a journal noted for “publishing material that crosses disciplinary boundaries”, while recognising that as it does “problems [may] arise from differences between academic disciplines … in the questions they find interesting, [and] the approaches and methods they use to answer these questions” (Macintyre, 2000, p.1)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-218
Number of pages4
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume175
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Metaphor
metaphor
Public Health
public health
paradigm
Health
health
Research Personnel
demographic situation
Health Status
Values
opposition
dialogue
discourse
Research
Population
community
Paradigm
Life Course

Cite this

@article{306017c00a4e4c8dbe0d926aa31b2c22,
title = "The lifecourse of place: Looking past paradigms and metaphors to the just nature of place-health – A rejoinder to Andrews’",
abstract = "Some twenty years ago Baum (1995, p.464) wrote in this journal that “Public health has … both to describe and to understand communities”. To achieve these objectives she recommended that public health research “should adopt a social view of health [and] not be dogmatically dominated by any one discipline or method” (Baum, 1995, p.466). We agree, though not simply as researchers with a vested interest in public health, but as researchers each with their own disciplinary backgrounds.Elsewhere we have discussed the value of an engaged discourse that spans disciplinary bounds as important to efforts that aim to understand, enable and promote population levels of health (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). Moreover, we have argued for an ideal where knowledge and understanding are progressed through dialogue and inquiry enacted from positions of opposition (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). These values mirror an objective of this journal; a journal noted for “publishing material that crosses disciplinary boundaries”, while recognising that as it does “problems [may] arise from differences between academic disciplines … in the questions they find interesting, [and] the approaches and methods they use to answer these questions” (Macintyre, 2000, p.1)",
keywords = "Health inequalities, Lifecourse, Methodology, Neighbourhoods, Public health, Spatial justice, Time",
author = "Peter Lekkas and Catherine Paquet and Howard, {Natasha J.} and Mark Daniel",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.035",
language = "English",
volume = "175",
pages = "215--218",
journal = "Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

The lifecourse of place: Looking past paradigms and metaphors to the just nature of place-health – A rejoinder to Andrews’. / Lekkas, Peter; Paquet, Catherine; Howard, Natasha J.; Daniel, Mark.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 175, 02.2017, p. 215-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - The lifecourse of place: Looking past paradigms and metaphors to the just nature of place-health – A rejoinder to Andrews’

AU - Lekkas, Peter

AU - Paquet, Catherine

AU - Howard, Natasha J.

AU - Daniel, Mark

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - Some twenty years ago Baum (1995, p.464) wrote in this journal that “Public health has … both to describe and to understand communities”. To achieve these objectives she recommended that public health research “should adopt a social view of health [and] not be dogmatically dominated by any one discipline or method” (Baum, 1995, p.466). We agree, though not simply as researchers with a vested interest in public health, but as researchers each with their own disciplinary backgrounds.Elsewhere we have discussed the value of an engaged discourse that spans disciplinary bounds as important to efforts that aim to understand, enable and promote population levels of health (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). Moreover, we have argued for an ideal where knowledge and understanding are progressed through dialogue and inquiry enacted from positions of opposition (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). These values mirror an objective of this journal; a journal noted for “publishing material that crosses disciplinary boundaries”, while recognising that as it does “problems [may] arise from differences between academic disciplines … in the questions they find interesting, [and] the approaches and methods they use to answer these questions” (Macintyre, 2000, p.1)

AB - Some twenty years ago Baum (1995, p.464) wrote in this journal that “Public health has … both to describe and to understand communities”. To achieve these objectives she recommended that public health research “should adopt a social view of health [and] not be dogmatically dominated by any one discipline or method” (Baum, 1995, p.466). We agree, though not simply as researchers with a vested interest in public health, but as researchers each with their own disciplinary backgrounds.Elsewhere we have discussed the value of an engaged discourse that spans disciplinary bounds as important to efforts that aim to understand, enable and promote population levels of health (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). Moreover, we have argued for an ideal where knowledge and understanding are progressed through dialogue and inquiry enacted from positions of opposition (Lekkas and Stankov, 2014). These values mirror an objective of this journal; a journal noted for “publishing material that crosses disciplinary boundaries”, while recognising that as it does “problems [may] arise from differences between academic disciplines … in the questions they find interesting, [and] the approaches and methods they use to answer these questions” (Macintyre, 2000, p.1)

KW - Health inequalities

KW - Lifecourse

KW - Methodology

KW - Neighbourhoods

KW - Public health

KW - Spatial justice

KW - Time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012294472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.035

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.035

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 175

SP - 215

EP - 218

JO - Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine

JF - Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -