The localism gap - the CLEAR failings of official consultation in the Murray Darling Basin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article argues that the inability of the Commonwealth and State Governments in Australia to affect significant progress on water reform is largely a product of their inability to win the hearts and minds of rural communities; a failure to understand the importance of localism. Hitherto, the failure to bring the politics back in and integrate community voices into the process of policy development has proved the major obstacle to the achievement of a balanced social and environmental perspective in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) and has served to reinforce traditional prejudices. This article makes four main contributions to the study of communities experiencing stress. Firstly, we present the case for deep local democratization in times of stress. Secondly, we build on a diagnostic tool – the Can do Like to Enabled to Asked to Responded to (CLEAR) model – to evaluate the effectiveness of the consultation process underpinning the Guide to the Murray Darling Basin Plan (MDBP) and apply it to the Forbes consultation. Thirdly and fourthly, we use the findings from this evaluation to identify principles of community engagement which provide the best possible conditions for effective social mobilization and the capabilities that are necessary to deliver effective citizen-centric policy outcomes in communities experiencing high levels of stress
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)541-558
    Number of pages18
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume34
    Issue number5-6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    community
    prejudice
    rural community
    democratization
    development policy
    mobilization
    diagnostic
    citizen
    water
    reform
    politics
    evaluation
    time

    Cite this

    @article{296aad8eb4dd4b9390467b00e9d39c3c,
    title = "The localism gap - the CLEAR failings of official consultation in the Murray Darling Basin",
    abstract = "This article argues that the inability of the Commonwealth and State Governments in Australia to affect significant progress on water reform is largely a product of their inability to win the hearts and minds of rural communities; a failure to understand the importance of localism. Hitherto, the failure to bring the politics back in and integrate community voices into the process of policy development has proved the major obstacle to the achievement of a balanced social and environmental perspective in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) and has served to reinforce traditional prejudices. This article makes four main contributions to the study of communities experiencing stress. Firstly, we present the case for deep local democratization in times of stress. Secondly, we build on a diagnostic tool – the Can do Like to Enabled to Asked to Responded to (CLEAR) model – to evaluate the effectiveness of the consultation process underpinning the Guide to the Murray Darling Basin Plan (MDBP) and apply it to the Forbes consultation. Thirdly and fourthly, we use the findings from this evaluation to identify principles of community engagement which provide the best possible conditions for effective social mobilization and the capabilities that are necessary to deliver effective citizen-centric policy outcomes in communities experiencing high levels of stress",
    author = "Mark EVANS and Lawrence PRATCHETT",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2013.862448",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "541--558",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "5-6",

    }

    The localism gap - the CLEAR failings of official consultation in the Murray Darling Basin. / EVANS, Mark; PRATCHETT, Lawrence.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 34, No. 5-6, 2013, p. 541-558.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The localism gap - the CLEAR failings of official consultation in the Murray Darling Basin

    AU - EVANS, Mark

    AU - PRATCHETT, Lawrence

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This article argues that the inability of the Commonwealth and State Governments in Australia to affect significant progress on water reform is largely a product of their inability to win the hearts and minds of rural communities; a failure to understand the importance of localism. Hitherto, the failure to bring the politics back in and integrate community voices into the process of policy development has proved the major obstacle to the achievement of a balanced social and environmental perspective in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) and has served to reinforce traditional prejudices. This article makes four main contributions to the study of communities experiencing stress. Firstly, we present the case for deep local democratization in times of stress. Secondly, we build on a diagnostic tool – the Can do Like to Enabled to Asked to Responded to (CLEAR) model – to evaluate the effectiveness of the consultation process underpinning the Guide to the Murray Darling Basin Plan (MDBP) and apply it to the Forbes consultation. Thirdly and fourthly, we use the findings from this evaluation to identify principles of community engagement which provide the best possible conditions for effective social mobilization and the capabilities that are necessary to deliver effective citizen-centric policy outcomes in communities experiencing high levels of stress

    AB - This article argues that the inability of the Commonwealth and State Governments in Australia to affect significant progress on water reform is largely a product of their inability to win the hearts and minds of rural communities; a failure to understand the importance of localism. Hitherto, the failure to bring the politics back in and integrate community voices into the process of policy development has proved the major obstacle to the achievement of a balanced social and environmental perspective in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) and has served to reinforce traditional prejudices. This article makes four main contributions to the study of communities experiencing stress. Firstly, we present the case for deep local democratization in times of stress. Secondly, we build on a diagnostic tool – the Can do Like to Enabled to Asked to Responded to (CLEAR) model – to evaluate the effectiveness of the consultation process underpinning the Guide to the Murray Darling Basin Plan (MDBP) and apply it to the Forbes consultation. Thirdly and fourthly, we use the findings from this evaluation to identify principles of community engagement which provide the best possible conditions for effective social mobilization and the capabilities that are necessary to deliver effective citizen-centric policy outcomes in communities experiencing high levels of stress

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2013.862448

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2013.862448

    M3 - Article

    VL - 34

    SP - 541

    EP - 558

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 5-6

    ER -