TY - JOUR
T1 - The Multi-Dimensional Emergence of Climate-Induced Migrants in Rights-Based Litigation in the Global South
AU - Andreolla Serraglio, Diogo
AU - Cavedon-Capdeville, Fernanda De Salles
AU - Thornton, Fanny
N1 - Funding Information:
Fanny Thornton would like to thank the \u2018Brazil East Africa Peru India Climate Capacities (B-EPICC)\u2019 project, which is part of the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), implemented by the Federal Foreign Office (AA).
Funding Information:
Diogo Andreolla Serraglio would like to thank the 'HABITABLE Project - Linking Climate Change, Habitability and Social Tipping Points: Scenarios for Climate Migration', funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 869395. Fernanda de Salles Cavedon-Capdeville would like to thank the 'Coordination for the Improvement of Higher-Level Personnel' (Coordena\u00E7\u00E3o de Aperfei\u00E7oamento de Pessoal de N\u00EDvel Superior, CAPES, Brazil - 88887.364635/2019-00 to F.S.C.C.). Fanny Thornton would like to thank the 'Brazil East Africa Peru India Climate Capacities (B-EPICC)' project, which is part of the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), implemented by the Federal Foreign Office (AA).
Funding Information:
Diogo Andreolla Serraglio would like to thank the \u2018HABITABLE Project \u2014 Linking Climate Change, Habitability and Social Tipping Points: Scenarios for Climate Migration\u2019, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 869395.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - The article evidences to what extent rights-based climate litigation is applied as a strategy to enhance the recognition and protection of climate-induced migrants. Adopting a deductive approach and desk review, the study, illustrates how climate-induced migration has been addressed by International Human Rights Law, with some attention also paid to the growing application of the right to a safe climate and climate justice. The study highlights the duties of both States and private actors in tackling the emerging climate crisis under the human rights agenda. Relevant responsibilities are framed in particular within the scope of rights-based litigation dealing with the topic. We present an analysis of litigation linked to climate-induced migration that was filed before distinct international, regional, and national jurisdictions and, in doing so, propose a chronology of cases - structured in three generations - of how population movements as a result of climate change have been discussed by judicial means. The first generation relates to cases that consider the issue from the perspective of protection - in both national, regional, and international jurisdictions. The second generation emerges within general climate litigation claims, involving commitments linked to the climate agenda. In addition to raising (forced) population movements as one of the expected impacts of climate change, such cases frequently call upon a rights-based approach. The third generation encompasses rights-based cases centred on climate-induced migrants per se. The strengths and limitations of rights-based litigation to respond to the topic are finally highlighted: we conclude that litigation remains a blunt but not unpromising tool to respond to climate-induced migration. Generic references to the risk of (forced) population movements largely prevail; nevertheless, strategic rights-based litigation can facilitate the visibility of climate-induced migrants to the international community, fostering the development of legal solutions in the longer term.
AB - The article evidences to what extent rights-based climate litigation is applied as a strategy to enhance the recognition and protection of climate-induced migrants. Adopting a deductive approach and desk review, the study, illustrates how climate-induced migration has been addressed by International Human Rights Law, with some attention also paid to the growing application of the right to a safe climate and climate justice. The study highlights the duties of both States and private actors in tackling the emerging climate crisis under the human rights agenda. Relevant responsibilities are framed in particular within the scope of rights-based litigation dealing with the topic. We present an analysis of litigation linked to climate-induced migration that was filed before distinct international, regional, and national jurisdictions and, in doing so, propose a chronology of cases - structured in three generations - of how population movements as a result of climate change have been discussed by judicial means. The first generation relates to cases that consider the issue from the perspective of protection - in both national, regional, and international jurisdictions. The second generation emerges within general climate litigation claims, involving commitments linked to the climate agenda. In addition to raising (forced) population movements as one of the expected impacts of climate change, such cases frequently call upon a rights-based approach. The third generation encompasses rights-based cases centred on climate-induced migrants per se. The strengths and limitations of rights-based litigation to respond to the topic are finally highlighted: we conclude that litigation remains a blunt but not unpromising tool to respond to climate-induced migration. Generic references to the risk of (forced) population movements largely prevail; nevertheless, strategic rights-based litigation can facilitate the visibility of climate-induced migrants to the international community, fostering the development of legal solutions in the longer term.
KW - climate crisis
KW - climate justice
KW - climate litigation
KW - climate-induced migration
KW - human rights
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194726299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jhuman/huad066
DO - 10.1093/jhuman/huad066
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194726299
SN - 1757-9619
VL - 16
SP - 227
EP - 247
JO - Journal of Human Rights Practice
JF - Journal of Human Rights Practice
IS - 1
ER -