The nature of workplace boundaries between Australians and Singaporeans in multinational organizations

A qualitative inquiry

Jennifer Loh, Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, Cindy Gallois

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper seeks to explore the nature of intercultural experiences of Australians and Singaporeans working in multinational organizations. Cultural differences are expected to influence how boundaries and boundary permeability are constructed which in turn affect how Australians and Singaporeans interact and communicate with each other.

Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 employees (ten Australians, 13 Singaporeans) working in multinational organizations in both Australia and Singapore. Grounded theory methodology was used to analyze interviewees' intercultural experiences to determine the nature and composition of relevant boundary categories and permeability.

Findings - Seven workplace boundary categories of varying degrees of permeability were identified. Singaporeans were perceived to create more impermeable boundaries than Australians. Impermeable boundaries were found to also restrict intercultural interactions.

Research limitations/implications - The qualitative nature of the study, small sample size and interviewer's ethnicity could limit the generalizability of the results. Another limitation is that the data were based on self-reports and participants may have reported socially desirable responses.

Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers who seek to promote the value of shared group membership and group identity.

Originality/value - This study integrates social identity theory with cross-cultural theories and extends its application into a collectivist culture (e.g. Singapore) to provide an in-depth understanding of the nature of workplace boundaries and boundary permeability between Australians and Singaporeans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-385
Number of pages19
JournalCross Cultural Management
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

international organization
permeability
workplace
Singapore
cultural theory
methodology
qualitative interview
grounded theory
cultural difference
group membership
Values
experience
ethnicity
employee
Work place
Multinational organizations
manager
interaction
interview
Group

Cite this

@article{c56a5b1d520e4a7bb83c4df317a3ed02,
title = "The nature of workplace boundaries between Australians and Singaporeans in multinational organizations: A qualitative inquiry",
abstract = "Purpose - This paper seeks to explore the nature of intercultural experiences of Australians and Singaporeans working in multinational organizations. Cultural differences are expected to influence how boundaries and boundary permeability are constructed which in turn affect how Australians and Singaporeans interact and communicate with each other. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 employees (ten Australians, 13 Singaporeans) working in multinational organizations in both Australia and Singapore. Grounded theory methodology was used to analyze interviewees' intercultural experiences to determine the nature and composition of relevant boundary categories and permeability. Findings - Seven workplace boundary categories of varying degrees of permeability were identified. Singaporeans were perceived to create more impermeable boundaries than Australians. Impermeable boundaries were found to also restrict intercultural interactions. Research limitations/implications - The qualitative nature of the study, small sample size and interviewer's ethnicity could limit the generalizability of the results. Another limitation is that the data were based on self-reports and participants may have reported socially desirable responses. Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers who seek to promote the value of shared group membership and group identity. Originality/value - This study integrates social identity theory with cross-cultural theories and extends its application into a collectivist culture (e.g. Singapore) to provide an in-depth understanding of the nature of workplace boundaries and boundary permeability between Australians and Singaporeans.",
keywords = "Australia, Singapore, National cultures, Multinational companies, Workplace",
author = "Jennifer Loh and Restubog, {Simon Lloyd D.} and Cindy Gallois",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1108/13527600911000348",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "367--385",
journal = "Cross Cultural Management",
issn = "1352-7606",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

The nature of workplace boundaries between Australians and Singaporeans in multinational organizations : A qualitative inquiry. / Loh, Jennifer; Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.; Gallois, Cindy.

In: Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 23.10.2009, p. 367-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The nature of workplace boundaries between Australians and Singaporeans in multinational organizations

T2 - A qualitative inquiry

AU - Loh, Jennifer

AU - Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.

AU - Gallois, Cindy

PY - 2009/10/23

Y1 - 2009/10/23

N2 - Purpose - This paper seeks to explore the nature of intercultural experiences of Australians and Singaporeans working in multinational organizations. Cultural differences are expected to influence how boundaries and boundary permeability are constructed which in turn affect how Australians and Singaporeans interact and communicate with each other. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 employees (ten Australians, 13 Singaporeans) working in multinational organizations in both Australia and Singapore. Grounded theory methodology was used to analyze interviewees' intercultural experiences to determine the nature and composition of relevant boundary categories and permeability. Findings - Seven workplace boundary categories of varying degrees of permeability were identified. Singaporeans were perceived to create more impermeable boundaries than Australians. Impermeable boundaries were found to also restrict intercultural interactions. Research limitations/implications - The qualitative nature of the study, small sample size and interviewer's ethnicity could limit the generalizability of the results. Another limitation is that the data were based on self-reports and participants may have reported socially desirable responses. Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers who seek to promote the value of shared group membership and group identity. Originality/value - This study integrates social identity theory with cross-cultural theories and extends its application into a collectivist culture (e.g. Singapore) to provide an in-depth understanding of the nature of workplace boundaries and boundary permeability between Australians and Singaporeans.

AB - Purpose - This paper seeks to explore the nature of intercultural experiences of Australians and Singaporeans working in multinational organizations. Cultural differences are expected to influence how boundaries and boundary permeability are constructed which in turn affect how Australians and Singaporeans interact and communicate with each other. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 employees (ten Australians, 13 Singaporeans) working in multinational organizations in both Australia and Singapore. Grounded theory methodology was used to analyze interviewees' intercultural experiences to determine the nature and composition of relevant boundary categories and permeability. Findings - Seven workplace boundary categories of varying degrees of permeability were identified. Singaporeans were perceived to create more impermeable boundaries than Australians. Impermeable boundaries were found to also restrict intercultural interactions. Research limitations/implications - The qualitative nature of the study, small sample size and interviewer's ethnicity could limit the generalizability of the results. Another limitation is that the data were based on self-reports and participants may have reported socially desirable responses. Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers who seek to promote the value of shared group membership and group identity. Originality/value - This study integrates social identity theory with cross-cultural theories and extends its application into a collectivist culture (e.g. Singapore) to provide an in-depth understanding of the nature of workplace boundaries and boundary permeability between Australians and Singaporeans.

KW - Australia

KW - Singapore

KW - National cultures

KW - Multinational companies

KW - Workplace

U2 - 10.1108/13527600911000348

DO - 10.1108/13527600911000348

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 367

EP - 385

JO - Cross Cultural Management

JF - Cross Cultural Management

SN - 1352-7606

IS - 4

ER -