TY - JOUR
T1 - The ontology of digital asset after death
T2 - policy complexities, suggestions and critique of digital platforms
AU - Park, Yong Jin
AU - Sang, Yoonmo
AU - Lee, Hoon
AU - Jones-Jang, S. Mo
PY - 2020/1/20
Y1 - 2020/1/20
N2 - Purpose: The digitization of the life has brought complexities associated with addressing digital life after one’s death. This paper aims to investigate the two related issues of the privacy and property of postlife digital assets. Design/methodology/approach: The understanding of digital assets has not been fully unpacked largely due to the current policy complexities in accessing and obtaining digital assets at death. This paper calls critical attention to the importance of respecting user rights in digital environments that currently favor service providers’ interests. Findings: It is argued that there are ethical blind spots when protecting users’ rights, given no ontological difference between a person’s digital beings and physical existence. These derive from the restrictive corporate terms and ambiguous conditions drafted by digital service providers. Originality/value: Fundamentally, the transition to the big data era, in which the collection, use and dissemination of digital activities became integral part of the ontology, poses new challenges to privacy and property rights after death.
AB - Purpose: The digitization of the life has brought complexities associated with addressing digital life after one’s death. This paper aims to investigate the two related issues of the privacy and property of postlife digital assets. Design/methodology/approach: The understanding of digital assets has not been fully unpacked largely due to the current policy complexities in accessing and obtaining digital assets at death. This paper calls critical attention to the importance of respecting user rights in digital environments that currently favor service providers’ interests. Findings: It is argued that there are ethical blind spots when protecting users’ rights, given no ontological difference between a person’s digital beings and physical existence. These derive from the restrictive corporate terms and ambiguous conditions drafted by digital service providers. Originality/value: Fundamentally, the transition to the big data era, in which the collection, use and dissemination of digital activities became integral part of the ontology, poses new challenges to privacy and property rights after death.
KW - Data ethics
KW - Digital remain
KW - Postlife digitalization
KW - Privacy
KW - Privacy and property rights
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077532765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ontology-digital-asset-after-death-policy-complexities-suggestions-critique-digital-platforms-1
U2 - 10.1108/DPRG-04-2019-0030
DO - 10.1108/DPRG-04-2019-0030
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077532765
SN - 2398-5038
VL - 22
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance
JF - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance
IS - 1
ER -