TY - JOUR
T1 - The Political Power of Big Business: A Response to Bell and Hindmoor
AU - MARSH, David
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - There has been a recent resurgence of interest in debates about the power of business (Culpepper 2011; Bell 2012) and Bell and Hindmoor (2013) make an important, theoretically informed, but empirically rooted, contribution to that debate. In this response, we address both aspects of their contribution, arguing that their treatment of Lindblom is partial and, consequently, so is their explanation of the case. As such, we largely rely on their narrative of the evolution of the Australian mining tax, focusing first on critically examining Bell and Hindmoor’s theoretical position, before turning to their analysis of the case.
AB - There has been a recent resurgence of interest in debates about the power of business (Culpepper 2011; Bell 2012) and Bell and Hindmoor (2013) make an important, theoretically informed, but empirically rooted, contribution to that debate. In this response, we address both aspects of their contribution, arguing that their treatment of Lindblom is partial and, consequently, so is their explanation of the case. As such, we largely rely on their narrative of the evolution of the Australian mining tax, focusing first on critically examining Bell and Hindmoor’s theoretical position, before turning to their analysis of the case.
KW - power
KW - mining tax
KW - Australian politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904039392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13563467.2013.829435
DO - 10.1080/13563467.2013.829435
M3 - Article
SN - 1356-3467
VL - 19
SP - 628
EP - 633
JO - New Political Economy
JF - New Political Economy
IS - 4
ER -