TY - UNPB
T1 - The prevalence of psychological distress and relationships with social fragmentation and isolation: a geospatial study and survey in rural Australia
AU - Forcadela, Victor
AU - Bagheri, Nasser
AU - Slimings, Claudia
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose There is limited data on the effects of social isolation on rural mental health. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of psychological distress in a rural area of Australia while exploring the association between psychological distress and social isolation at the individual and area level. Methods An online cross-sectional survey of 408 adult volunteers was conducted across rural south-eastern New South Wales from October 2019 to April 2020. The Kessler 10 was used to measure psychological distress, while area-level social fragmentation was assessed using the family (ANSFI fam ) and mobility (ANSFI mob ) components of the Australian Neighbourhood Social Fragmentation Index. The number of different occupations of people known socially was used to assess individual-level social isolation. Spatial analysis was performed to identify any spatial autocorrelation. Results The prevalence of high psychological distress in the sample was 29%. Using logistic regression models, there was little evidence of a relationship between high psychological distress and ANSFI fam (odds ratio (OR)=0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.93–1.03), or ANSFI mob (OR=1.04, 95%CI=0.99–1.09). High psychological distress also did not appear to be associated with number of occupations known socially (OR=1.00, 95%CI=0.99–1.00). There was no significant spatial autocorrelation of psychological distress or social fragmentation at the postal area level. Conclusion The results suggest that social fragmentation or isolation may not have a significant effect on psychological distress in a rural setting. Nevertheless, further investigation of the effects of social isolation on mental health in rural areas is warranted.
AB - Purpose There is limited data on the effects of social isolation on rural mental health. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of psychological distress in a rural area of Australia while exploring the association between psychological distress and social isolation at the individual and area level. Methods An online cross-sectional survey of 408 adult volunteers was conducted across rural south-eastern New South Wales from October 2019 to April 2020. The Kessler 10 was used to measure psychological distress, while area-level social fragmentation was assessed using the family (ANSFI fam ) and mobility (ANSFI mob ) components of the Australian Neighbourhood Social Fragmentation Index. The number of different occupations of people known socially was used to assess individual-level social isolation. Spatial analysis was performed to identify any spatial autocorrelation. Results The prevalence of high psychological distress in the sample was 29%. Using logistic regression models, there was little evidence of a relationship between high psychological distress and ANSFI fam (odds ratio (OR)=0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.93–1.03), or ANSFI mob (OR=1.04, 95%CI=0.99–1.09). High psychological distress also did not appear to be associated with number of occupations known socially (OR=1.00, 95%CI=0.99–1.00). There was no significant spatial autocorrelation of psychological distress or social fragmentation at the postal area level. Conclusion The results suggest that social fragmentation or isolation may not have a significant effect on psychological distress in a rural setting. Nevertheless, further investigation of the effects of social isolation on mental health in rural areas is warranted.
U2 - 10.1101/2020.11.12.20230771
DO - 10.1101/2020.11.12.20230771
M3 - Preprint
T3 - medRxiv
SP - 1
EP - 15
BT - The prevalence of psychological distress and relationships with social fragmentation and isolation: a geospatial study and survey in rural Australia
ER -