TY - JOUR
T1 - The prevalence of refractive error and visual impairment among New Zealand children in a community with significant socioeconomic disadvantage
T2 - is current preschool vision screening effective?
AU - Findlay, Rebecca
AU - Black, Joanna
AU - Anstice, Nicola
AU - Burge, Alison
AU - Leversha, Alison
N1 - Funding Information:
Nil. Acknowledgements: Many thanks to the children and schools for their time and participation in the project. Rebecca Findlay was supported by funding by SJ Taylor Grant, New Zealand Association of Optometrists and a Senior Health Research Scholarship from University of Auckland. The Welcome to School Study was supported by funds from Cure Kids, Joyce Fisher Charitable Trust and A+ Charitable Trust. Author information: Rebecca Findlay, PhD Candidate, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland; Joanna Black, Senior Lecturer, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland; Nicola Anstice, Discipline Lead, Optometry and Vision Science, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia; Alison Burge, Research Nurse, Starship Community Services, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland; Alison Leversha, Community Paediatrician, Starship Community Services, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland. Corresponding author: Rebecca Findlay, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142. [email protected] URL: www.nzma.org.nz/journal-articles/the-prevalence-of-refractive-error-and-visual-impairment-among-new-zealand-children-in-a-community-with-significant-socioeconomic-disadvantage-is-current-preschool-vision-screening-effective
Publisher Copyright:
© NZMA.
PY - 2020/4/24
Y1 - 2020/4/24
N2 - AIM: To examine the prevalence of refractive error and visual impairment and evaluate the efficacy of B4 School Check (B4SC) vision screening, in a cohort of predominantly New Zealand Maori and Pacific children from a community with socioeconomic disadvantage. METHOD: A cross-sectional investigation of children in the Welcome-to-School study. Participants received a comprehensive eye examination at six to seven years of age. Refractive error and amblyopia were identified and compared with B4SC vision screening results. RESULTS: One-hundred and fourteen children were assessed: 21.9% Maori, 57.9% Pacific and 20.2% Other. Over 30% of children had significant refractive error. Eighty-nine percent received a B4SC; 26.3% of children who passed the B4SC had significant refractive error. Seven children (6.1%) had amblyopia risk factors: none passed the B4SC, four were referred, one was identified for rescreening and two were not screened. CONCLUSION: Refractive errors were common in this cohort. For those screened, the B4SC was effective at identifying children with amblyopia risk factors but poor at detecting refractive errors potentially affecting academic performance. The efficacy of the programme was limited by the number of children screened, inequity of screening and the mismatch between the aims of the vision screening test and the overall rationale for the B4SC.
AB - AIM: To examine the prevalence of refractive error and visual impairment and evaluate the efficacy of B4 School Check (B4SC) vision screening, in a cohort of predominantly New Zealand Maori and Pacific children from a community with socioeconomic disadvantage. METHOD: A cross-sectional investigation of children in the Welcome-to-School study. Participants received a comprehensive eye examination at six to seven years of age. Refractive error and amblyopia were identified and compared with B4SC vision screening results. RESULTS: One-hundred and fourteen children were assessed: 21.9% Maori, 57.9% Pacific and 20.2% Other. Over 30% of children had significant refractive error. Eighty-nine percent received a B4SC; 26.3% of children who passed the B4SC had significant refractive error. Seven children (6.1%) had amblyopia risk factors: none passed the B4SC, four were referred, one was identified for rescreening and two were not screened. CONCLUSION: Refractive errors were common in this cohort. For those screened, the B4SC was effective at identifying children with amblyopia risk factors but poor at detecting refractive errors potentially affecting academic performance. The efficacy of the programme was limited by the number of children screened, inequity of screening and the mismatch between the aims of the vision screening test and the overall rationale for the B4SC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086685344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
SN - 0028-8446
VL - 133
SP - 33
EP - 41
JO - New Zealand Medical Journal
JF - New Zealand Medical Journal
IS - 1513
ER -